Contentstack Adaptive Digital Experience Platform
ContentstackExternal reviews
300 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Very User-Friendly and Easy to Adopt Without Disrupting Work
What do you like best about the product?
It is very user friendly. Easy to figure out without disrupting any previous work.
What do you dislike about the product?
Very small, but having to go back between page editing and asset pulling. For example I have to create a page, then save it, then go to assets, copy URL, then go back to page to insert URL. Again, nit picking, but there should be a way to pull asset from the page I am editing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is solving website display for our organization. It creates a way to showcase our business to our members in a seamless and easy to read way.
CMS Expert Endorsement
What do you like best about the product?
Clear and easy-to-use structure. I've used dozens of CMS throughout my career and ContentStack is the best so far.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think that headless CMS should have a tree or folder-based option for ease of organization. Would be a nice add.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ease of use. I was able to build out my content with minimal training.
Fast and User-Friendly Digital Migration Tool
What do you like best about the product?
I like Contentstack for its ease of building, which allows me to work faster. The alignment and ability for partners to search content are also helpful. We switched to Contentstack because of its ease of usability for end-users, and the initial setup was great.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing at this time. I think Contentstack is great for my needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Contentstack for digital migration, which solves alignment and content search for partners. I like its ease of building, which helps me work faster. We switched due to its usability for end-users.
Clean interface and easy to use. Highly recommended
What do you like best about the product?
I love the user interface and how clean it looks. Very easy for someone dealing with a content management system for the first time to understand the various functions are.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes formatting after publishing to authoring can get a bit fiddly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Content can be managed centrally and delivered consistently across all digital touchpoints, this ensures a consistent user experience.
Contentstack: Where Flexibility Meets Complexity
What do you like best about the product?
As a CMS, it performs at impressive speed, making both content management and updates efficient. Changes are reflected on the live site almost instantly, which I find very convenient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Limits on extensions, custom fields, workflows, assets etc.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a headless CMS, it allows us to create content once and distribute it seamlessly to different channels—websites, apps, and even digital touchpoints like kiosks or screens—without duplicating effort. This centralized content structure saves time, reduces inconsistencies, and makes updates much faster.
The modular content modeling is also a big benefit. It gives both developers and content teams the flexibility to build structured components, which improves reusability and speeds up campaign launches.
For our team, the biggest advantage has been:
A clear separation between content creation and presentation, which gives marketing more autonomy while keeping development agile.
Easier collaboration between multiple stakeholders through workflows and role-based permissions.
Faster time-to-market for new pages or campaigns since we can update content without waiting for code deployments.
The modular content modeling is also a big benefit. It gives both developers and content teams the flexibility to build structured components, which improves reusability and speeds up campaign launches.
For our team, the biggest advantage has been:
A clear separation between content creation and presentation, which gives marketing more autonomy while keeping development agile.
Easier collaboration between multiple stakeholders through workflows and role-based permissions.
Faster time-to-market for new pages or campaigns since we can update content without waiting for code deployments.
Perfect work, nothing to improve
What do you like best about the product?
I like the way of working so perfect.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing I don't like, because they have everything I need.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The real-time content update, the CMS standardization, the content visualization
Intuitive UI and Time-Saving Live Previews
What do you like best about the product?
I use Contentstack for content management across multiple websites, handling everything from copy and images to videos and site configurations. I love how it provides a centralized and user-friendly space, making it easy for even non-technical team members to use. The intuitive UI really stands out to me, as it simplifies navigation and usability significantly. Another feature that I find incredibly beneficial is the live preview, which is a huge plus for my workflow. It allows me to see changes in real time, enabling quick adjustments without needing to save first, thus saving time and ensuring that updates look exactly as desired. Lastly, the initial setup was straightforward thanks to the Contentstack starter kit, which was extremely helpful.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the conditional showing of input fields in Contentstack a bit limited. Specifically, there's an issue when some fields have certain configurations that restrict their conditional display. For example, if a File input is set to 'Accept Images only,' it can't be conditionally shown or hidden, which limits flexibility and customization in displaying input fields.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Contentstack to centralize our content management, making it user-friendly for non-technical team members. Its intuitive UI and live preview save us time, ensuring real-time updates and adjustments without needing to save changes.
Intuitive CMS: Why Contentstack empowers our non-technical teams
What do you like best about the product?
Contentstack has become a core component of our content operations, serving as the central hub for both our website content and all of our CRM communications. As a non-technical user, my experience has been largely positive, especially regarding how quickly we’ve been able to scale our content output and onboard new team members.
For our non-technical teams, the user interface is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. This simplicity is a massive win, making the platform genuinely simple to use and to onboard users without needing a deep dive into code or complex documentation.
I also appreciate the platform's modular approach, which gives us many different content "modules" to choose from. This flexibility allows us to structure content exactly how we need it for different channels. For my daily work, adding assets and localized content is straightforward. I can easily manage multiple language versions of an entry, which has significantly streamlined our international publishing workflows. The quick adoption and high comfort level among our editors prove the success of its design.
For our non-technical teams, the user interface is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. This simplicity is a massive win, making the platform genuinely simple to use and to onboard users without needing a deep dive into code or complex documentation.
I also appreciate the platform's modular approach, which gives us many different content "modules" to choose from. This flexibility allows us to structure content exactly how we need it for different channels. For my daily work, adding assets and localized content is straightforward. I can easily manage multiple language versions of an entry, which has significantly streamlined our international publishing workflows. The quick adoption and high comfort level among our editors prove the success of its design.
What do you dislike about the product?
While the daily content editing is smooth, I do encounter a couple of recurring technical frustrations, particularly within the Asset Manager.
My biggest pain point is the occasional bug when uploading assets. The search function for a specific folder directly from the assets page often acts up. It will either fail to return results or just be generally unresponsive. The workaround is to click on "upload" and then search for the desired folder from that specific modal, which is a bit of a nuisance when I’m just trying to locate an existing image.
Also, while I find localization easy, I know other teams struggle with the platform’s limitations on bulk operations (like publishing more than 20 entries at once).
My biggest pain point is the occasional bug when uploading assets. The search function for a specific folder directly from the assets page often acts up. It will either fail to return results or just be generally unresponsive. The workaround is to click on "upload" and then search for the desired folder from that specific modal, which is a bit of a nuisance when I’m just trying to locate an existing image.
Also, while I find localization easy, I know other teams struggle with the platform’s limitations on bulk operations (like publishing more than 20 entries at once).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Contentstack's editor-friendly interface removes dependency on developers to create, edit or publish content, allowing us to work faster.
Adding localized content is straightforward. This simplifies the management of multilingual content, allowing us to rapidly deploy campaigns in new markets.
Adding localized content is straightforward. This simplifies the management of multilingual content, allowing us to rapidly deploy campaigns in new markets.
Everyday Contentstack user
What do you like best about the product?
The simplicity of multi-local publication of pages.
What do you dislike about the product?
The CMS search functionality, I feel this can be made better especially when refining search filters.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multi-local content publishing and Governance is a big part of our business, Contentstack makes it easy to publish content to each individual local. These improvements have significantly boosted efficiency, cutting upload time by half and reducing developer backlog.
Highly robust and flexible CMS
What do you like best about the product?
Contentstack's ability to automate processes is critical to our operations. We run a large utility company, and all notifications about construction and outages must reach our customers efficiently. With a well-established process in Contentstack, our customer service team is self-sufficient in sending out notifications. Automated processes ensure that the latest updates are always visible to website users.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are mainly limitations in the rich text editor that could be improved in my opinion. However, I think these are issues that our web cosultants could fix with a better setup.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Contentstack is a great CMS that helps me in my day-to-day operations. My main tasks involve all kinds of content management as well as ongoing customer solution development. I like the CMS’s user interface, the system’s stability, the continuous software development, and how it compares to other CMS platforms. In the coming months, we are moving our service website over to Contentstack, and we expect to have much more control over the service pages once the setup is finalized.
showing 11 - 20