Automox

Automox

Reviews from AWS customer

3 AWS reviews

External reviews

281 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


    Tushar Prasad

Cloud-native patch automation has secured our remote endpoints and simplifies cross-platform compliance

  • May 15, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

Automox is used in our system primarily to manage patch management. It helps in managing Windows updates, third-party application updates, browser patching, and security updates across employee laptops, verification teams, recruiters, operational staff, and our distributed workforce.

Since we have a remote culture, Automox helps in policy enforcement, software deployment, scripting, and remediation without requiring VPN connectivity or corporate LAN presence. It also handles third-party application patching, such as Chrome, Zoom, Adobe, Java, and Slack, ensuring that all these tools are properly patched. It provides patch compliance visibility, endpoint reporting, and vulnerability reporting, which helps during audits, customer security reviews, and SOC 2 compliance assessments.

Automox has helped us in automated patch management, specifically for Windows patches, third-party software patching, and remote endpoint remediation. Since we follow a remote culture, it is very important that our systems are safe. Automox has been a good tool and helps us in managing all those security capabilities.

What is most valuable?

Its biggest strength is cloud-native simplicity. Unlike different SCCM tools, it has no distribution points, no complex infrastructure, no heavy VPN dependencies, and no large management servers. It has very strong patch automation, particularly in automated OS patching, third-party patching, policy-based rollout, patch scheduling, and vulnerability remediation. It offers cross-platform support from Windows to Mac OS to Linux.

What needs improvement?

From an enterprise perspective, Automox could have better compliance reporting, which is needed for audit readiness, security reviews, and customer compliance evidence. It could also leverage AI, which would help in autonomous patch prioritization and risk remediation. It could provide better integration with SIEM tools, vulnerability scanners, ITSM platforms, and more granular controls for enterprises to create their own custom workflows. The cost is generally higher than its competitors.

I think the cost factor is a concern across the industry, as Automox is costlier than its competitors.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with this solution for over 8.5 years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Automox has replaced and simplified our earlier SCCM patch workflows.

What about the implementation team?

Automox is managed directly by Automox.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

If you are looking for a solution that requires less infrastructure overhead and you have a strong remote workforce, then Automox will be the best tool for safeguarding your systems, as it provides patches on a need basis, safeguards the systems, and ensures the systems are protected from malicious intent, viruses, or any other threats.

What other advice do I have?

Our company purchased Automox last year only.

Automox has eased our operations. It is very simple to use and does not have heavy workflows. The security teams regularly use it. It has a triangle-like icon which ensures that the system is patched and proof.

Since we have a remote workforce, Automox provides VPN-less patching. We have distributed operations, so it provides cloud-native management. It provides different kinds of patch automation and helps us in reducing infrastructure overhead. It is suitable for cross-platforms including Windows, Mac OS, and Linux, and it is easier than any other SCCM solution.

Automox is a strong tool for managing the remote workforce. It ensures that our systems are not vulnerable and issue-proof, with all systems properly patched on a timely basis without needing VPN connectivity.

Automox is used in a centralized cloud-native approach across our globally distributed employee devices.

I believe Automox is moving in the right direction. If it can contain the cost, I think its demand will rise and it will consolidate a major market share.

I gave this product a rating of eight out of ten.


    Financial Services

User-Friendly Integrations That Fit Our Existing App Infrastructure

  • April 28, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
User friendly intergrations with existing app infrastructure
What do you dislike about the product?
No clear response on product failures. Documentation repository is not well presented.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of basic tasks in infrastructure. Speeding up and saving time.


    Bryan B.

Flawless for 2 Years—Plays Nicely with Our Security Stack

  • April 07, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
This program does not interfere with any of our security stack programs and has worked flawlessly for 2 years on many Windows Server versions.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have no dislikes about the app or the interface or the rules etc.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I do not have to manually log in to each server to get updates status and something cannot be rebooted for whatever reason I get an email and know which servers require attention.


    Financial Services

Effortlessly Patches Hundreds of Servers and Keeps Us Compliant

  • April 07, 2026
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
I like its ability to patch hundreds of servers at a time efficiently, which helps us stay compliant with our security initiatives.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel they need to improve their reporting and offer more canned reports.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automox helps us stay on top of patching while using fewer employees.


    Dennis Mascot

Automated patching has reduced vulnerabilities and now saves hours on managing endpoints

  • March 23, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Automox is automated patch management for our whole organization, managing and patching our endpoints. Automox has helped us reduce security vulnerabilities with automated patching being deployed with minimal manual intervention. This has helped us reduce the number of vulnerabilities that are susceptible for an attacker to exploit. Automox has also been easy to deploy with a large scope of endpoints across many operating companies in our organization.

A specific example of how Automox helped me with automated patch management is that it was easy to create and configure policies and schedule patching that is done automatically.

What is most valuable?

The best features Automox offers include automated patch management, ease of deployment, visibility, and reporting.

The visibility and reporting features of Automox help me with great oversight of current patching status on our infrastructure.

I would add that the ease of deployment across a large number of endpoints is commendable. Additionally, the user interface is very intuitive and user-friendly.

Automox has positively impacted my organization with significant time-saving. Automated patching has saved countless hours on manual patching and updating endpoints, approximately three to four hours. It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically. Automox is easy to manage and deploy and offers Automox University, which is a great resource to use for learning the platform.

What needs improvement?

I believe some expansion on deployment status for troubleshooting would be beneficial.

I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Automox for the past six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

According to my experience, Automox is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth and it caters to all our organizational growth.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I previously used Microsoft 365 as a different solution.

I switched from Microsoft 365 to Automox because we wanted a tool that would automatically patch our devices, thereby saving a lot of time and cost. It was also very cost-effective compared to Microsoft 365, which is why we made the switch. Automox also gave us the capability to automate patch deployment for operating systems and support third-party software to allow for consistent patching and quantifiable reduction in security vulnerabilities.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment since we save a lot of hours for management. We are able to focus on critical areas and devote our work time to the areas that need more of our attention. It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers. Automox being a cloud-native platform has removed our need for on-premises patching infrastructure, saving expenses and overhead for management, improved visibility, and consolidated control of our endpoints, thus reinforcing our ability to quickly respond to vulnerabilities.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Automox, I evaluated other options such as FortiClient and Freshservice.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others looking into using Automox is that it is well-suited for centralized patch management within a remote or distributed environment because it is cloud-native. However, it is not suitable for legacy or overly customized systems that need unusual update processing. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    Naqash Ahmed

Automation has saved time and improves secure, centralized patching across all our devices

  • February 07, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I mainly use Automox to manage updates and automate tasks on company devices. In my day-to-day uses, I primarily use it for updating devices and reviewing patch management. I focus on keeping Windows and macOS devices up to date manually. Another daily example is using Automox to automatically check for devices that need updating, such as installing security patches without manual intervention. Every morning, I check Automox and it shows which device got updated overnight, and I review and approve anything that is pending.

What is most valuable?

If I want to add more about my daily workflow, first of all, I would say it saves a lot of time. It reduces manual work for updates and patching. I don't have to go device by device myself because Automox does it automatically for me. It improves security as well, keeping the devices secure with the latest patches. It's much easier for me to monitor which devices need attention.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching. It automatically updates computers and servers without manual intervention. It supports many platforms. For example, in our organization, we use Windows, macOS, and Linux. The good thing is it supports all of them. I can patch laptops and servers of different types at the same place and at the same time. It's much easier to control because I can see all the devices in one online portal. No VPN or local server is needed. Automox helps me update applications like Chrome, Adobe, Java, and other third-party tools, not just operating systems. It's much easier to remotely control. It also shows me pre-built reports, giving me the ability to view and download reports to show management that the updates are complete.

Out of all these features, if I had to pick one which I'm relying on the most, I would say the automatic patching. The reason is because it saves a lot of time and ensures all devices are updated. I don't have to manually update each Windows, Mac, or Linux device; Automox does it automatically. It's very important because it keeps all devices secure and current. I can quickly see in the dashboard which devices were updated successfully and which ones need updating. Everything can be viewed in the dashboard, which stands out greatly to me and is my favorite feature.

Automox allows me to do custom automation beyond updates. For example, I can use it to update third-party applications and customize things in my dashboard. I can build my own report and see which devices and patch status I want to see on my dashboard based on each role. Different levels of access for team members require different types of access. The customization I can do in my dashboard means I can see and change the report style and design of my own choice.

What needs improvement?

While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement. I want the custom reports to be even more detailed, specifically where I can add more details. It would be nice to have more filters in reports based on location and department more easily. Secondly, the notifications could be more customizable. Many times notifications come, but we don't have control over which notification is urgent and which is not. For example, if there's an alert of a critical update or pending approval, it can help me focus better. An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important. Customized notifications would be much better.

I would say the user interface could be improved as well. Some parts of the dashboard are a bit hard to understand. If they could be improved to be more intuitive, for example, if it could be easy to navigate between devices and reports, that would be great. I would say if Automox could also provide automation templates, that would help. I know there are templates, but I want more templates. Having ready-made worklets for common tasks can save a lot of time. Lastly, it should also support the interface for mobile screens.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Automox for more than one year, approximately one year and six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Automox is very stable in my experience because it saves a lot of time and has reduced many errors. It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime. It patches and updates correctly across all devices, so it is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Automox's scalability is good because we can always scale it based on the number of devices we want to use. We started with about 150 devices and now we manage about 100 devices without any issues. It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support is usually good. Whenever we have something to ask or requirements we need, we can send them emails and they are very helpful. For example, we had an issue and the team responded within a few hours. They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The team used to struggle a lot. We were using manual patching with some basic scripts to update devices, but that was not a good solution. We switched because manual updates were time-consuming and there were more chances of errors. We switched to Automox because it updates automatically across Windows, Mac, and Linux devices. The benefit of switching is it saves a lot of time, improves security, and gives us control and monitoring in more real-time.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. Pricing was very straightforward through a subscription process via AWS Marketplace. We pay clear monthly and yearly fees, so billing is simple. The setup cost was minimal because it's SaaS, so there was no hardware to buy. Licensing was also flexible per device licensing.

What was our ROI?

Automox saves time because it does the automatic updates and reduces manual work. Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically. It's saving about 70% to 80% of time. The security has improved a lot. If I compare our issues to one and a half years ago, there used to be many more, and now it has gone very low. Another metric is that not many devices are left behind as we ensure all devices are up to date with the new patches and updates.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options while choosing Automox. Some of the options we looked at were ManageEngine, Ivanti, and Microsoft Endpoint. We chose Automox because it was easier to use, cloud-based, and supports multiple platforms, which obviously saves us time and reduces manual errors.

What other advice do I have?

I would tell others to identify your needs, whatever you're looking for. If you want to save your time, take advantage of automation, go for Automox. If you want to start small and scale later on, Automox is good. If you want nice reports and want to leverage your support across all your devices at the same time, go for Automox. I would rate this product an 8 overall.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    Nathan B.

Effortless Setup, Superior Device Management

  • November 27, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
I love how Automox provides a centralized approach to managing our device estate, which immensely enhances our reporting and visibility of device health. The user interface is remarkably intuitive, and its simplicity stands out as a major advantage. Additionally, I highly value the ability to build custom worklets and policies tailored to our specific business needs, offering significant flexibility. Automox's integration with Rapid7 is another substantial benefit that enhances its functionality. The initial setup was very easy, quick, and straightforward, allowing us to be up and running within hours. Furthermore, the shift to Automox from Datto RMM was primarily driven by its cost-effectiveness, advanced functionality, and superior flexibility. Overall, I am thoroughly impressed with Automox's comprehensive offerings and would highly recommend it to others, giving it a rating of ten out of ten.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find the lack of integrations with Jira and Teams to be a limitation. This adds complexity to our workflow since these are tools we frequently use.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Automox for centralizing estate management, improving reporting and device health visibility. It simplifies OS patch management and remediation, offers easy setup, and integrates with Rapid7 to enhance functionality and flexibility.


    Financial Services

Easy to use, built more for Windows

  • September 11, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
- Easy to use a create policies
- Reliable for windows machines
- Useful for running other sys-admin scripts as well
What do you dislike about the product?
- Not as purpose built for Apple Mac laptops
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Patching applications on end-user machines (Windows and MacOS)


    ABRAR AHAMED M.

efficient tool for patch management

  • August 13, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Automox's automation process and capabilities save significant time by pushing updates across multiple devices. It has a highly user-friendly interface and offers cross-platform support, which is helpful for both Windows and Linux users. The real-time visibility into patch status and compliance reports is also a great help in maintaining security posture.
What do you dislike about the product?
While Automox is reliable, there can be occasional delays in reporting status updates after patches are deployed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
automox helps us by automate patch management process and eliminating the manual effort of updating device,This reduces security vulnerabilities, ensures compliance, and saves significant time for the IT team. Its cross-platform compatibility ensures consistent security for both Windows and Linux systems, improving overall operational efficiency.


    Hasir H.

Best Patch management tool with multiple options

  • August 13, 2025
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
As a cybersecurity engineer, I find Automox extremely effective in mitigating outdated software with just a single click. The Group Policy customization options are excellent, allowing us to tailor settings such as scheduling, automatic restarts, and more to meet our specific needs. With the one-click scan feature, we can quickly patch devices, making the entire process seamless and efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
I haven’t noticed any disadvantages so far. However, having a single, built-in connector for seamless integration with SIEM and ticketing tool would make it even more efficient and valuable.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We conduct quarterly audits, and previously, we had to manually access each device to patch outdated software. Automox has simplified this process, allowing us to complete the task quickly and efficiently.