Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a beautiful threat emulation different from the market. They have a threat extraction feature. The solution's zero phishing feature is pretty much commendable. The solution has one of the best reporting any vendor has in network security. The solution also has a CSPM or posture management tool inbuilt into CGNS or network security.
Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)
Check Point Software TechnologiesExternal reviews
252 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
The solution has good threat emulation, threat extraction, and reporting features
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
The solution’s technical support, DNS security and training could be improved. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's training and reachability to the customer can be done a bit better. One recommendation from my side is that the handover of the tasks can be a bit better. If an engineer is on a ticket and their shift gets over, the smooth handshake between the two engineers can be a bit better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for more than one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is a scalable product. I would recommend the solution to small, medium, and enterprise companies because it has a scalable model. The solution is over the cloud and can be integrated with any company.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I worked with Palo Alto, a direct competitor of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security. CloudGuard Network Security's threat extraction features, reporting features, and threat emulation are better than Palo Alto's. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is more user-friendly than Palo Alto. On the other hand, Palo Alto has a bit better DNS security than Check Point CloudGuard Network Security.
How was the initial setup?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is easy to deploy, and if you are unable to do it, you can get support from the OEM.
What about the implementation team?
The solution's implementation depends on the customer's network scenario and policies. The initial setup doesn't take more than 30 minutes, and the rest can be done later.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's pricing is far better than Palo Alto's because Palo Alto is very expensive. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security comes at a price that even a small business can manage to buy, whereas Palo Alto would restrict you to enterprise customers. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's licensing cost changes from country to country. The solution has different discount models across the globe in regions like Asia and Ireland.
What other advice do I have?
People who want to implement Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should focus during the planning phase. If planning is done correctly and the prerequisites are matched perfectly, they won't face any challenges during deployment. But it's very important to check the prerequisites' limitations.
Overall, I rate Check Point CloudGuard Network Security nine and a half out of ten.
Awesome security with an awesome cloud guard experience.
What do you like best about the product?
With the help of an integration with GWLB, CloudGuard Network Security offers powerful threat-prevention capabilities. It incorporates firewalling, an IPS, and application control technologies to quickly identify and stop known and unidentified threats. This helps protect your cloud workloads by ensuring that harmful traffic is kept out of your VPC. It was totally user friendly, this is an important aspect of cloud guard.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have nothing against anything. Totally content.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
By combining the features of CloudGuard Network Security with Gateway Load Balancer, it improves the security of their AWS systems. It provides me with secure access management, comprehensive network visibility, and excellent threat prevention.
Secure Your Network with CloudGuard
What do you like best about the product?
First and foremost, CloudGuard Network Security for Gateway Load Balancer delivers advanced cyber threat defense, such as DDoS attacks and Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). It provides various features, such as a Web Application Firewall, Content Filtering, etc. The second excellent feature is that it provides real-time monitoring and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing to dislike. However, there are certain limitations, such as if I want some specialized requirements that CloudGuard does not fully provide. Its additional configuration increased the difficulty and cost of building a secure cloud network.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
One of the most challenging problems I've encountered regarding protection and security is that CloudGuard is readily linked with load balancers to provide additional security and scalability. I can defend their cloud network from threats while ensuring high availability and performance by deploying CloudGuard with load balancers.
CloudGuard Network Security with the advantages of Gateway Load Balancer
What do you like best about the product?
CloudGuard Network Security integrates with GWLB to provide robust threat-prevention capabilities. It includes firewalling, an intrusion prevention system (IPS), and application control features to detect and block known and unknown threats in real-time. This ensures that malicious traffic is prevented from reaching your VPC and helps safeguard your cloud workloads
What do you dislike about the product?
everything was cool and fine, like With the integration of CloudGuard Network Security for Gateway Load Balancer, GWLB's capabilities are improved by introducing cutting-edge threat prevention and security features
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It increase the security of their AWS environments by integrating Gateway Load Balancer's capabilities with CloudGuard Network Security's. It offersme safe access management, scalable and effective threat prevention, and thorough network visibility and control.
Review of Cloud Guard Network Security
What do you like best about the product?
Cloud Guard is Network layer Load Balancer used to load balance traffif at network level and benefits of network load balancer are it can manage tcp and udp traffic at network level and easy to troubleshoot using packet tracer tcpdump or wireshark tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
CloudGuard works well to manage network level traffic and load balance traffic at network level but it cannot be used as Application Load Balancer to manage http or https traffic and apply ssl certificate on load balancer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CloudGuard Network Security is best Network Load Balancer which has maximum throughput and we were looking solution for tcp and udp traffic which serves best using CloudGuard Network Security product.
Excellent Product
What do you like best about the product?
Makes load balancing seamless and the security is excellent
What do you dislike about the product?
Can't think of any issues in CloudGuard yet.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We primarily use this for load balancing
Review on CloudGuard Network Security for gateway load balancerIt helps to
What do you like best about the product?
It helps to protect assets with advance Security technologies that include Firewall, IPS, Application Control and anti-Virus. User-friendly interface is easy to understand.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is no such dislike from my side as I am satisfied with its services. The only drawback is that it does not support VPN.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It provides HA in the cloud for scalability and maintenance while bringing the best security to the firms with inbuilt features.
Fair price, good support, and effective for security and operational efficiency
What is our primary use case?
We use it for network protection. We're using its latest version.
How has it helped my organization?
We're benefiting from the solution. We're protecting all of our assets with it. It's a very good security solution. We don't face any big challenges or problems.
What is most valuable?
Security effectiveness is the most valuable feature. Operational efficiency, reporting, and support are also good.
What needs improvement?
The SD-WAN could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than ten years.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is very good. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have been using the same solution from the beginning.
How was the initial setup?
What about the implementation team?
We used an integrator. Our experience with them wasn't great.
What was our ROI?
We've seen an ROI with this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's not very expensive. It isn't very cheap either. Its price is okay. It depends on how much money you have. It might be expensive for some companies.
Its licensing is on a yearly basis.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated solutions from Forcepoint, Cisco, and Fortinet. We went for it because of its security effectiveness and operational efficiency.
What other advice do I have?
It's the best solution to use. You can trust it. We don't have any issues with it. It works fine.
Overall, I'd rate it a ten out of ten.
Versatile with a good interface and fair pricing
What is our primary use case?
My clients were different small businesses, and they were migrating to the cloud. We've been using it as a general cloud security tool.
How has it helped my organization?
The interface in terms of being able to have access for myself and the client so that we can easily observe and watch what is going on, has really improved the organization.
We have seen time to value with this solution. We will continue to use more Check Point solutions in the future.
What is most valuable?
The versatility is the solution's most valuable feature.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for only about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is good. I'd rate the stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I'd rate the scalability a nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The support is good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
I'm involved with the integration and was involved in the setup of specific areas.
The initial setup was alright. I wasn't the architect of the whole thing. In my area, the implementation seemed to be pretty straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We did not use an integrator, reseller, or consultant for the deployment.
What was our ROI?
We do not yet have enough of a baseline to calculate ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is fair. It's the client who is paying for it, not me directly. However, they seem satisfied.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We previously evaluated a few other options.
What other advice do I have?
The usability is moderate.
The product has helped us free up some time. It's a complicated situation, however.
I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Provided good visibility, saved a lot of time and resources, and didn't have any downtime
What is our primary use case?
We were providing infrastructure security. Our corporate headquarters at the time was overseas, so we had GDPR compliance regulations. It was helping us to keep in line with our compliance.
How has it helped my organization?
It saved us resources. We were a lean IT department, so I was able to reassign some staff to other projects because it didn't require so much hands-on manpower.
What is most valuable?
The notifications, the visibility, and the deployment are the most valuable. It could be packaged in such a way that it took a lot of time and resources off our hands, so it was more efficient. I don't know how to quantify the time saved. It would have saved us at least two to three hours a day just because the traditional IT department has a lot of other tasks and duties. It didn't require a lot for us to become experts on the product. It was seamless. It didn't require too much learning. It was easy to use.
What needs improvement?
With the incorporation of a lot of AI and machine learning, they can build some sort of a matrix for low-level threats or low-level things that require attention. There can be automation of those tasks so that we don't have to take more time and effort. There should be machine learning to eliminate level-one types of tasks.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used this solution for six years. I'm a Cybersecurity Instructor. I used it in my previous role. I'm not using it in my current role.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I thought it was extremely stable. I didn't see any downtime. Any of the maintenance windows were either on weekends or in time frames that didn't affect our organization. It was very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It would be able to scale up even bigger and beyond what our local site needed. There were about a hundred and fifty employees. It was a manufacturing organization in San Antonio, Texas, but we were just one of twenty sites all throughout the US and Europe.
How are customer service and support?
They were helpful in total. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I believe we had a WatchGuard firewall with other services coupled around it. It didn't necessarily do all of the protection that we needed, but that's what we had at the time.
How was the initial setup?
I was involved in its deployment. It wasn't too challenging. It was easy to medium. Configuration with the compliance side was what took time and effort and was challenging, but it didn't have anything to do with the way the software is built. It was about getting our settings and configurations to be in alignment with the compliance.
What about the implementation team?
I believe headquarters had Check Point support.
What was our ROI?
The return on the investment was probably more beneficial to the headquarters or the mother corporation because we were just one of the remote sites that had the checkpoint infrastructure sent to us to build up our site. The bigger benefit was for the headquarters because they could manage all these individual sites from one platform. The consolidation and the standardization would have made their lives easier, but I didn't sit in a seat, so I don't know what that looked like.
We have seen time to value with this solution. It provided us with great benefits across the entire organization. We could see its value within about a month. That was probably enough time to let all of the initial shakeout and other things take place. We created a baseline after those thirty days, and we could see where we no longer needed to spend time. We could also see things where we had to take some action but were not apparent to us.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
They're a little high in price. The price could be lower.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I wasn't that high in the chain to be able to make that decision. Corporate pushed it down to our site, and that's what we had to go with.
What other advice do I have?
Attending an RSA Conference provides the ability to connect with others in the industry. It allows me to have a line of communication where I can reach out to them in person rather than just a digital introduction.
In terms of the impact of attending an RSA Conference on the cybersecurity purchases made throughout the year afterward, I don't necessarily think about our purchases, but considering I'm a Cybersecurity Instructor, the people that attend our classes are going to be able to benefit because I can provide them more solutions and answers to the questions that they have.
I enjoyed it as a product. It works well. Overall, I'd rate it an eight out of ten.
showing 191 - 200