Sold by: IBM Software
Deployed on AWS
Gartner Magic Quadrant leader, IBM Targetprocess is a software platform for work and portfolio management which facilitates enterprise agility at all levels by enabling both Business and IT to work in one holistic solution. Targetprocess supports both product-centric and project-centric development.
4.3
Overview
IBM Targetprocess is a leading enterprise agile planning (EAP) solutions that enables business and technology planners at all levels to dynamically plan and manage work, resources, investments, programs, and portfolios while ensuring continuous alignment to the enterprise strategy in a single source of truth. The combination of flexible architecture and Solutions Library ensure the fastest time to value for every solution. Targetprocess is the only EAP platform that that integrates directly with the industry-leading ApptioOne financial management platform to provide financial insights into labor allocations, labor capitalization, and labor forecasts to improve how a company measures, plans, and invests in their workforce.
Highlights
- Purpose-built for Enterprise Agile Planning to give flexibility in leveraging frameworks, methodologies, and tools of your choice.
- Understand resource capacity and make informed trade-off decisions. Align strategy to investment portfolios and team execution for faster delivery of innovation.
- Drill down or scale up, from any level of the portfolio hierarchy, with the distraction-free view of projects and products using SAFe or any framework.
Details
Sold by
Delivery method
Deployed on AWS
New
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide
Gain valuable insights from real users who purchased this product, powered by PeerSpot.
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
AWS Marketplace now accepts line of credit payments through the PNC Vendor Finance program. This program is available to select AWS customers in the US, excluding NV, NC, ND, TN, & VT.
Pricing
Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor. This entitles you to a specified quantity of use for the contract duration. If you choose not to renew or replace your contract before it ends, access to these entitlements will expire.
Additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. Use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate your infrastructure costs.
Dimension | Description | Cost/12 months |
|---|---|---|
TP_25Users | Annual fee, Includes 125 Connected Users, private offer available | $40,500.00 |
Vendor refund policy
Refunds, cancellations, and credits are issued on a case-by-case basis
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Upon subscribing to this product, you must acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the vendor's End User License Agreement (EULA) .
Content disclaimer
Vendors are responsible for their product descriptions and other product content. AWS does not warrant that vendors' product descriptions or other product content are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Delivery details
Software as a Service (SaaS)
SaaS delivers cloud-based software applications directly to customers over the internet. You can access these applications through a subscription model. You will pay recurring monthly usage fees through your AWS bill, while AWS handles deployment and infrastructure management, ensuring scalability, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services.
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Updated weekly
By IBM Software
By Planview
By Inflectra Corporation
Top
10
In Planning and Forecasting
Top
50
In Project Management
Top
50
In Agile Lifecycle Management, Project Management
Sentiment is AI generated from actual customer reviews on AWS and G2
Functionality
Ease of use
Customer service
Cost effectiveness
Positive reviews
Mixed reviews
Negative reviews
AI generated from product descriptions
Enterprise Agile Planning
Platform designed for enterprise-level agile planning enabling dynamic planning and management of work, resources, investments, programs, and portfolios.
Multi-Framework Support
Supports multiple development frameworks and methodologies including SAFe, product-centric and project-centric development approaches.
Financial Management Integration
Integrates directly with ApptioOne financial management platform to provide financial insights into labor allocations, labor capitalization, and labor forecasting.
Resource Capacity Management
Enables understanding of resource capacity and informed trade-off decision making through resource allocation visibility.
Portfolio Hierarchy Navigation
Provides drill-down and scale-up capabilities across portfolio hierarchy levels with distraction-free views of projects and products.
Portfolio Optimization
Optimizes funding and resource capacity allocation across multiple business functions and project portfolios
End-to-End Visibility
Provides comprehensive visibility across business and technology planning with tracking of actuals against planned metrics
Capacity and Demand Balancing
Balances resource capacity against organizational demand to prioritize work and focus resources effectively
Strategic Plan Integration
Connects strategic plans and funding allocation to Agile delivery methodologies and execution
Multi-Stakeholder Planning
Supports dynamic planning and collaboration across executives, PMOs, finance, transformation leaders, and development teams
AI-Assisted Content Generation
Inflectra.ai generates user stories, acceptance criteria, and test cases from plain-language input with context-aware automation embedded in the platform.
End-to-End Traceability
Requirements, risks, tasks, tests, and defects are linked in a relational structure enabling impact assessment, coverage validation, and proactive risk management.
Multi-Level Work Hierarchy Management
Unified management of portfolios, programs, projects, releases, and sprints with support for shared resources, budgets, timelines, and dependencies across the organization.
Compliance and Governance Controls
Controlled workflows, approval processes, electronic signatures, and user-level audit trails provide transparent, repeatable, and fully documented work processes for regulated industries.
Real-Time Visibility and Planning Tools
Kanban boards, Gantt charts, real-time dashboards, workload and capacity management features, and built-in time tracking for forecasting and delivery outcome prediction.
Validated by AWS Marketplace
FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO/IEC 27001
PCI DSS
SOC 2 Type 2
No security profile
No security profile
-
-
-
-
Standard contract
No
No
Customer reviews
Joseph Washington
Visual workflow has improved planning and reporting and now supports data driven decisions
Reviewed on Apr 09, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
Targetprocess is a powerful product that is frequently used by the whole organization. The powerful visualization of my workflow is a blessing because it allows me to have a perfect distraction-free overview of my projects. Moreover, the ability of this software to drill down or scale up is quite astonishing in order to get details from each and every level of the hierarchy in just a few minutes.
What is most valuable?
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way. It lets us use graphical and custom reports to pinpoint certain trends and I am able to forecast performance. Additionally, program board management, risk stroke dependency management, creating graphs and dashboards, and project governance planning are also great features.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization because the license cost is low, hence saving a lot of time and cost. Efficiency has been improved.
I am able to save approximately three to four hours per project. Also, it has increased levels of cross-team transparency.
What needs improvement?
Targetprocess can be improved by enhancing integration. Also, personalization capabilities at every user level should be improved.
I would add that it should allow users to navigate easily.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Targetprocess for the past five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Targetprocess is very stable. I have not experienced any downtime or lagging.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Targetprocess's scalability is very impressive. I have continued to handle more huge and small projects, all within the given timeframe. It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Jira software and also Digital.ai before switching to Targetprocess.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment as we are no longer working in multiple tools to keep track of work for different teams. Transparency has increased within and across our teams. I can do better short-term and long-term planning and can put together roadmaps within the tool.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective. The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Targetprocess, I evaluated Slack as another option.
What other advice do I have?
A quick specific example of how I use Targetprocess in my daily work is that the timeline feature is making my activities and time tracking abilities more enhanced and effective. Hence, I am able to tackle more projects on time and I am able to hit the deadline and deliver the projects on time to my clients.
I would add that Targetprocess enables me to consolidate silos of data into a useful pattern without any hesitation. Hence, I am able to make data-driven decisions easily.
My advice to others looking into using Targetprocess is that I think the tool could be utilized for most groups wanting to track their work. It provides functionality that can be customized to meet the needs of multiple groups within the same organization.
I have additional thoughts about Targetprocess, as its biggest strengths are that it is highly customizable, can fit the needs of almost any team, it is a robust reporting tool, easy to use and administer, and provides all the functionality an Agile organization would be looking for. The support team and user guide are phenomenal.
I would rate this product an 8 overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Cynthia Ruth
Portfolio planning has become transparent and daily work visualization supports priority decisions
Reviewed on Mar 31, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Targetprocess is to organize our software backlog and track all the work items done by the various teams, and I also track our issues, bugs, dependencies, releases, and more for all of the projects and teams that work within the IT and Technology Development departments.
A quick, specific example of how I use it for one of my projects is that dashboards are then used to track progress across this and to see how they influence each other.
In addition to that, I use Targetprocess for creating work instructions, capturing decomposition of features, and planning, and it also helps developers know what work has priority.
What is most valuable?
The best features Targetprocess offers include proper visualization of work items for daily use, which assists in reducing time in planning meetings due to the usability of the boards, and planning boards help discussion about budgets with management.
The visualization and planning boards make my daily work easier as they help developers know what work has priority.
Targetprocess does a fantastic job for creating and using boards, visualizing decomposition of features in work items and planning.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization since we started using this tool, and it has been really useful because we were able to see improvement in transparency while noting that user-friendly and portfolio overview could be better.
The positive outcomes I have seen include managing big projects.
One major impact we have now is Jira integration, which helps us as it helps product teams to do big room planning in a structured way.
What needs improvement?
The user interface design of Targetprocess should be improved.
I believe it should be more user-friendly and easy to customize for new users.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for the past eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Targetprocess is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability has been robust as it continues to handle our organization's growth.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support has been very professional and helpful.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used IBM Apptio as a different solution and switched because of the improvements I found with Targetprocess.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment as it has reduced waste via maximizing integrations, enabled greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabled us to be more data-driven with transparency of change data so we can regularly inspect and adapt, reducing cost in comparison to the previous supplier.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that it is a very cost-effective and affordable tool.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Targetprocess, I evaluated other options, specifically IBM Apptio.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Targetprocess is that it is a really positive top solution within the market that I have ever used, and with one supplier, I was successful with integration for years, but with IBM Targetprocess, we proved connection and integration within a couple of months, which saved a lot of time. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Johan Sven
Integrated planning and monitoring have improved collaboration and optimized infrastructure usage
Reviewed on Mar 29, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
In our organization, specifically in the technology and information department, we use Targetprocess to monitor all devices and ensure the proper performance and functionality of our infrastructure in our day-to-day operations.
To ensure that our infrastructure functions correctly, I utilize Targetprocess to monitor all the devices, and it is perfect for multiple services that cover a large volume of transactions such as a recent project we worked on.
We also use Targetprocess to manage portfolio demand, resource allocations, and costs in a way that is beneficial for our operations.
What is most valuable?
Targetprocess offers features that include monitoring all devices, report generation, ensuring that our infrastructure functions correctly, and performance predictions, and I particularly love the seamless integration with Jira software.
The integration with Jira helps to manage work management effectively.
Helping the management is also a great feature of Targetprocess.
Targetprocess has helped with collaboration within my organization, achieving better cross-departmental collaboration. It has also saved a lot of time due to its capabilities for clear planning, improved cross-team collaboration, reduced the need for multiple tools since it includes service desk and project management, easy project planning, good reporting tools, and easy integration with financial tools.
What needs improvement?
One of the improvements I think Targetprocess needs is addressing the lack of information regarding comments submitted from requests.
It does not save the notification option configured when logging a comment, and other users in my organization complain that the main search option is not user-friendly, which sometimes frustrates us or slows us down.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Targetprocess for the last eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Targetprocess is very stable in our operations.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Targetprocess's scalability accommodates growth and increased workloads in my organization, and it has been handling it perfectly.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support provided by Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Smartsheet and Asana before adopting Targetprocess.
We switched from Smartsheet and Asana to Targetprocess because of its superior integration with Apptio and Jira, although we are still using Workboard since Targetprocess does not allow a many-to-many OKR connection.
What was our ROI?
Targetprocess has helped to monitor all the devices and ensure they are correctly functioning, which reflects a good return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very cost-effective with affordable license plans.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Targetprocess, I evaluated other options like Planview and Adaptive Work.
What other advice do I have?
So far so good because this tool has been really great in my organization, positively impacting our processes. I rate Targetprocess nine out of ten based on my experiences with it.
I give it a nine because it helps managers create and organize work tasks effectively and helps workers in my organization manage their own and their assigned tasks easily.
My advice for others looking into using Targetprocess is that it works very well. I appreciate the way it accurately analyzes actual usage to detect inactive infrastructure, and it is very cost-effective and easy to use, making it highly recommended for multiple services that cover a large volume of transactions.
Its extensive integration capabilities with other IBM tools, specifically IBM Targetprocess tools, make it a perfect platform for linking asset data with help desk operations, which is worth mentioning. I have assigned an overall rating of nine out of ten to this product.
William Galas
Portfolio teams have gained transparent planning and have aligned strategy with delivered work
Reviewed on Mar 27, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
Targetprocess is currently being used within our organization to help us pull together, make visible and track all our work value that is developed and delivered within our portfolio.
We find that no other tool allows us to consolidate work into easy-to-understand views, coordinate and predict business outcomes, as well as make visible the strategy to execution to ensure alignment across the portfolio.
We also create roadmaps for development teams to share during quarterly planning and for tracking and reporting on different work efforts.
What is most valuable?
The best features Targetprocess offers include consolidating and representing data in a meaningful and impactful manner, a simple user interface that is easy to navigate, and the ability to edit and improve through mashups and detailed views. Automation and validation ensure that we are able to workflow and monitor delivery of value across critical points.
Targetprocess allows for different reporting for tracking work progress.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization as it has been a great tool. Team-level transparency has increased, and cost per story point has improved.
Transparency has increased as cross-team collaboration has improved.
We have seen a return on investment as we've seen a reduced need for spreadsheets, more transparency of the work that is going on, and the ability for teams to see what other teams are working on. Additionally, departmental and cross-departmental collaboration has improved.
What needs improvement?
Targetprocess can be improved as integrations with third parties should be enhanced.
A needed improvement includes single sign-on.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Targetprocess for the same equal amount of time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Targetprocess is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Targetprocess is very highly scalable because it handles my organization's growth well.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Planview AgilePlace before switching to Targetprocess.
How was the initial setup?
I purchased Targetprocess through the AWS Marketplace .
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment as we've seen a reduced need for spreadsheets, more transparency of the work that is going on, and the ability for teams to see what other teams are working on. Additionally, departmental and cross-departmental collaboration has improved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience has been very affordable, and the cost is very effective.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Targetprocess, I evaluated other options such as Atlassian Jira and Planview AgilePlace .
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into using Targetprocess that our users who are not part of a program or portfolio find it difficult and cumbersome to use and maintain. I would recommend the teams using their own views and report scenarios, whereas it is less appropriate due to executive-level reporting and to develop reports that can pull in all our time data.
I did not find anything that needs changing for the future. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Lesley Noah
Transparent tracking has aligned teams and has improved cycle times and outcome-based planning
Reviewed on Mar 27, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use Targetprocess to organize my software backlog and track all the work items done by the various teams. I also use it to track issues, bugs, dependencies, releases, and more for all of the projects and teams that work within my IT and technology development departments. I love that the dashboards are then used to track progress across this and to see how they influence each other.
I use Targetprocess to create work instructions, capture the decomposition of features, and plan. It helps developers also know which work has priority.
How has it helped my organization?
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by providing clear planning and better cross-team collaboration. Since I started using this tool, Targetprocess has been really great because no direct positive business ROI has caused executive leadership to downplay the use of the tool. An improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days has occurred by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
I tracked improvements in cycle time using visualization and tracking functionality, which helped me improve the cycle time from 97 days to 45 days. Measuring outcomes and business value was great, and connecting work to strategy helped me see alignment across the organization and provided meaning for people in their work.
What is most valuable?
The best features Targetprocess offers include proper visualization of work items for daily use and assistance in reducing time in planning meetings due to the usability of the boards. Planning boards help discussions about budgets within management and help developers understand what work has priority.
Customization in Targetprocess is great; it is multi-faceted and serves as a single source of truth.
What needs improvement?
I believe Targetprocess can be improved by incorporating AI to allow users to better understand and interpret data. Additionally, the ability to upgrade the solution instead of having to uninstall and reinstall should be enhanced.
While the report functionality is great, it is somewhat restricting. It would also be wonderful to export reports to PowerPoint and link them with Power BI.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Targetprocess for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Targetprocess is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Targetprocess is highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I used Jira Align .
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Targetprocess is a very cost-effective and affordable tool compared to other alternatives.
What about the implementation team?
I purchased Targetprocess through the AWS Marketplace .
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment as it was easier to implement, less restrictive in terms of customization, and lower in cost.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Targetprocess is a very cost-effective and affordable tool compared to other alternatives.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Targetprocess is that it will definitely work in an environment where you want to measure and track the delivery of work to business outcomes and make this work transparent and visible to all levels of the organization.
In terms of my portfolio without IBM process, Targetprocess has considerably accelerated my adoption of agile practices, which would have been at a slower and more cumbersome pace. Comparing my portfolio to other internal portfolios as well as external companies, I see that the lack of adequate tools to measure, monitor, and improve is a limiting factor.
I give this product an overall rating of nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud