The whole purpose of having the product is to have endpoint security and visibility with those endpoints as well. After an evaluation period, we determined the product would be a fit for our organization.

The security and visibility we have on all endpoints helped our organization immensely.

There's not one particular item that stands out the most besides the availability of the product itself. We're a small organization. Having the visibility and the protection that it provides helped out greatly. Plus, it fits with our requirements.

The product does not have to go across a lot of different solutions. We don't have a cloud or anything like that where we have to push it in terms of visibility. The deployment is fairly simple. In the end, the overall visibility of it is very simple and the usability has been very simple for us as well.

So far, it helped to reduce our alerts. Based on the application that we would utilize prior to this product, the alert reduction is similar. It is not 100% the same, just similar. They gave us some visibility into what was going on, which provided a 30%, if not more, alert reduction.

It helped free up staff time. Using this solution, we don't have to keep our eyes on it 100% of the time.

It reduced our mean time to detect and respond.

The product helped reduce organizational risk.

The overall product quality is good. I'd give it three and a half stars out of five. It checked all of our boxes. It met the requirements of the security we needed.

If for some reason, we were breached, it gave us the comfort of knowing that we could either automatically set the product to fix the issue or at least record it and let our team go in and resolve the issue. However, it also has the data to hunt the threat if need be. It's given us so much more than we would have expected from a product. Their dashboard is great. We log in and we get everything we need to know right out of the box on our dashboard. If we have anything that's infected it will tell us all of that information in real time. In our environment, it works without giving us any issues or slowing down our productivity in the process. The agent that runs on the system is not heavy. It's easily portable.

Initially, when we first deployed the solution, it caused some third-party connectivity issues. It would see it as an application that was not secure. However, we were able to put in a white listing, to help us operate well. We had to do that with around five applications that we ran. Once we applied those fixes, we haven't had any issues since.

I'd like them to make it easier to log in.

I've been using the solution for 4 years.

I have not experienced any downtime with it. It has not crashed.

It won't run on our accounting server, and we're not sure why the agent caused the conflict with this particular server. Beyond that, it's fine.

****Update: This has been resolved since this review

We deployed the solution to about 200 endpoints.

We've only contacted technical support for the licensing portion of the process. They were very helpful and very straightforward. Everything was right on the money. Once we made the call over the ticket, we were contacted and it was resolved while we were on the phone.

We used Fortinet as well. We've used a few products and this solution does everything we've asked it to do. It was a good replacement for the free Fortinet solution and it protects against things Fortinet does not.

In the past, for some reason, we found that somehow or another, the agent was disabled, and we have not determined as to why that is just yet.

I was involved in the solution's initial deployment.

The deployment was fairly easy. We had a product that allowed us to push the agents out there. It was time-consuming based on the fact that we didn't have full automation. The only other drawback was when it was going through and doing some form of machine learning, it would block certain applications that we had to whitelist with the system in order to get it to work. However, we deployed it in less than thirty days, and it's been running everything well since then.

Our team, comprised of four people, handled the implementation.

There isn't really any maintenance needed. All the agents update well. It is fairly automated.

The initial onboarding was done with SentinelOne. After that, we took it from there.

The pricing is good. It's a big factor for us. Their pricing comes in much less than Fortinet or CrowdStrike.

We looked at similar products, such as CrowdStrike and other versions of Fortinet.

I'd rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I'd advise new users to do a proof of concept. That way, you get some time with the system before you deploy it into the environment, and you can iron out issues. If you have 1,000 endpoints and only 1% of the issues that we ran into, it would still be significant, and you'd want to deal with them head-on to make the full deployment easier.

It is an all-in-one agent on multiple operating systems that can detect malicious and suspicious activities. You can also use it to respond to different threat signals that you get from the platform.

There are multiple engines that run different types of detection, such as behavioral-type activities, that it can detect. It can also detect malicious activity based on a hash. It's a pretty great tool.

Overall, the level of detection and visibility we get have vastly improved, and that means the protection for our company has improved likewise.

Singularity has helped reduce the number of alerts we get. We were using FireEye at one point, and it was producing a ton of false positives. We have seen a major reduction in false positives, and that has saved our team's time. We have time to do other projects now.

In my previous company, we were using a Cisco product, and there was a ton of time wasted. Out of a 40-hour week, about eight to 10 hours were wasted, and with Singularity, we were able to get back about nine of those hours. Obviously, there are alerts coming in, and you have to investigate them, but the number was greatly reduced. In my current company, about 15 hours a week were wasted with false positives and wild goose chases and alerts. Now, we may put an hour into investigations. The great thing about SentinelOne is that you can get right down to what's going on with the events and deep visibility. It has saved us around 12 to 14 hours a week.

It's pretty quick when it comes to time to detect because you're right on the endpoint. Some agents have a delay in terms of when they report back to a console or a reporting server, but with SentinelOne, it seems that the agent is talking to the console right away. There isn't a huge delay.

Our mean time to respond is also very quick once we see the threat come in. It depends on the policy that is in place and the type of threat. If it is something suspicious, which we don't always have a set response for with the platform, we are able to easily look at what's going on a couple of minutes before the threat and what comes after. We can see the artifact on the endpoint, what is executed and what the user was probably doing. That means we're able to respond really quickly with all that visibility.

When it comes to cost savings, in the first company where I used SentinelOne, man-hours were saved, and it was cheaper to use SentinelOne than the Cisco product.

One use case where we've reduced risk has been due to users using something risky. They were trying to use an application that's like a keylogger. We've blocked it, and we've also created a rule using a star to detect when people are trying to use it. We have also set up rules to detect downloads of risky software, and that's protecting us too. It's protecting us from risk, but there's not a lot of reduction other than some protections and blacklists.

The deep visibility is a valuable feature. I can use it during threats or alert signals that we get. I can also use it when we have alert signals from other security tools that we have. I can use the SentinelOne platform to dive into those, even though there's no alert from SentinelOne, and zero in with a timestamp using its deep visibility to look at an endpoint and see if there's anything going on that might be correlated to a threat.

And Singularity's interoperability with other solutions has been a major bonus. You can put exclusions in place for other security platforms. For example, if you're using Symantec, you could easily put in an exclusion for that. The way that you can put them in, with the scope and the different groups, is really great. Singularity also provides pre-baked exclusions for interoperability with other pieces of equipment. For instance, for Microsoft SQL Servers, it already has pre-baked exclusions that you can put in for interoperability. It's far beyond the other platforms that I was using before.

In terms of ingestion, it's definitely taking in a lot of information at the endpoint level. You still need a human to do some of the correlation of the activities. The SentinelOne platform is looking at the endpoint, but you still need a human on the other end to analyze what the human at the other end of the endpoint was doing. But overall the solution does pretty well at correlating activities. I have seen some serious threats come in, and it definitely detects them right away with a pretty good correlation to the threat.

During my use of it over the years, they've been continuously improving it.

My biggest complaint is that when you're logged into the console there is the Help section where you can review all the documentation. But when you log in to the support portal, there is documentation there as well. They need to sync those two into one place so that I don't have to search in two different locations for an answer.

And I'm on the fence about whether to keep the agents a little bit longer than they do, before they go end-of-support. That might be an improvement, but I'm not positive about that.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for about four years.

Uptime is all the time.

I've only had one experience where there was a disconnect between the agents and the console. It was pretty brief, but that is when I opened a case with support. I had never seen that before, so the uptime is awesome. It's up 99.9 percent of the time.

It's very scalable. We are working on a special project, in which we want to set up a lab for a special event. I talked with our support, and they said we could set up another site. It's really scalable.

As I mentioned, I recently had a case because there were a lot of agents offline for a moment. Their support responded within one minute. That was an outlier. Every other case that I've opened up with them has not been a priority-one issue, but they usually respond within about five to 10 minutes, and they have been really great. I have not had an issue yet with support.

Everyone I've worked with in support is awesome. They always have the answers. Even if it's a complex issue, we usually get right down to it. I'm really happy with support.

I have used it in two different workplaces. Both workplaces were replacing platforms that just did not perform well and did not give you good visibility into what was going on on the endpoints. Both had a higher rate of false positives, and neither had the various detection engines that SentinelOne provides.

I was involved in the initial deployment of the solution in my previous place of employment and it was straightforward. It was only made complex by our own IT department.

There is a little maintenance. I check on a daily basis because you can build out multiple groups. When a new agent is deployed, I have it start off in a specific group to get the agent installed, and then it does a full disk scan. There is a little maintenance—and maybe no one else does this—but I log in and check for new systems. Once they have their full disk scan completed, I'll move them over to the production policy. You could do that on a weekly basis but I do it daily. The morning maintenance is less than five minutes for me, and you could definitely do that weekly as well.

I did it mostly by myself. I had another engineer working with me but that was it. It's really easy, a no-brainer. And that was for about 1,200 endpoints

I'm not a manager, but the return on investment may be in saving man hours.

When we were checking out different platforms we did get a price from Microsoft and it was unreasonable. SentinelOne was definitely reasonable and worth the money.

I've used several different platforms. We had a demo of the Carbon Black EDR, and I've used the FireEye EDR, Symantec, and Cisco.

We did a comparison between CrowdStrike, Carbon Black, and looked at Microsoft's EDR products.

As far as consolidation of security solutions goes, I have some suggestions for my leadership. I think we can definitely consolidate. For instance, we have a certain network segmentation where we have multiple security tools, including the SentinelOne agent and other agents on the devices. These devices are lower-end systems that don't have super-high specs like you might have on a power user's PC. In that area, we could eliminate one of the security agents and leave the SentinelOne agent. We would be covered in several different areas, such as FIM. I could create a custom rule to watch a certain configuration file, and if it changed, we would receive an alert. You can definitely use it to consolidate. Although we haven't done that yet, we're going to start because it's possible with the SentinelOne.

I believe we could save money by reducing the number of agents on those endpoints. If you walk that back to the yearly cost when we buy licenses, we should be able to save money on licensing for the other agent that we're using.

SentinelOne is very mature as an EDR platform. I would definitely put it in my top two. Across the breadth of everything I've dealt with using SentinelOne, even support, it's definitely top-two and you should check it out. I don't have a bad thing to say about it.

You definitely have to check out SentinelOne. They are firing on all cylinders for multiple areas that you want to consider when buying a tool like this. They're at 100 percent. When it comes to visibility, they present the information so that it's easy to read and understand. Responding is really easy to do. Support, which is a big factor nowadays, has faltered at some companies over the past four years, but support from SentinelOne has been awesome. Put SentinelOne in your PoCs. If you're looking at a couple of companies, you have to look at SentinelOne.

SentinelOne as a provider is a major player in hardening the protection of our environment.