ACCELQ
ACCELQReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
110 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Efficient Test Automation with Seamless Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I really like ACCELQ's no Code Automation and its robust support for web, mobile, and API testing. It allows our teams to quickly create and maintain tests, integrate with CI/CD pipelines, and gain real-time insights into quality metrics. The platform's intuitive interface and collaborative features help us maintain high-quality standards and regulatory compliance efficiently. Additionally, ACCELQ's automation speeds up onboarding and reduces dependency on specialized resources, and its support across critical systems ensures comprehensive coverage, which is vital for our medical devices and internal applications. The initial setup was smooth and straightforward, with guided configuration enabling us to start automating tests and managing workflows efficiently.
What do you dislike about the product?
While ACCELQ is a powerful platform, there are a few areas that could be improved to better serve complex medical device environments. Reporting and dashboard capabilities could be more customizable, allowing us to track specific metrics and trends across multiple projects more efficiently. Enhanced integration with certain legacy systems and specialized medical software would also be valuable, as it would streamline workflows and reduce manual coordination.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
ACCELQ streamlines and automates our testing processes, ensuring quality and compliance in medical device software. It eliminates repetitive manual testing, reduces human errors, and simplifies API and integration testing, providing better visibility into test progress and regulatory compliance.
Codeless Automation Boosts Collaboration and Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate ACCELQ's codeless, model-based automation, which reduces test maintenance and allows both technical and non-technical team members to contribute. It provides clear traceability between requirements, tests, and results, making it particularly valuable for managing complex research workflows. The automation helps create tests quickly and easily adapt them when applications change, improving collaboration and ensuring broader coverage. The setup was straightforward, and we were able to configure projects and integrate with our CI/CD pipelines swiftly. This combination of efficiency, flexibility, and traceability is what sets ACCELQ apart.
What do you dislike about the product?
While ACCELQ is very powerful, some reporting and dashboard features could be more flexible to support the specific metrics and analytics needed for research. Additionally, integration with certain niche or legacy tools could be expanded to make workflow even smoother.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate web and API testing, reducing test maintenance, ensuring consistency, and improving release reliability. Its traceability and integration into CI/CD pipelines aid in compliance and efficient workflow management.
Reliable No Code Test Automation Platform for Agile Teams
What do you like best about the product?
What we appreciate most about ACCELQ is t's no code approach to automation. Our teams are able to design and execute automated tests for both web and API applications without writing code. This has made collaboration between QA engineers, analysts, and business stakeholders much easier.
What do you dislike about the product?
Advanced customization may require guidance from documentation or support. Initial setup and learning the platform structure can take some time. But kind of easy to integrate if you have Tech experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
ACCELQ is a reliable continuous testing platform that helps organizatons accelerate testing while keeping maintenance efforts low. For teams looking for a scalable cloud based automation solution that supports both technical and non-technical users, ACCELQ is definitely worth considering.
Streamlined Test Automation with Easy Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I use ACCELQ to automate functional and API testing for our internal applications. I find the natural language approach to building test cases really makes them easier to read and maintain, which is a plus for team members not focused on automation to still contribute to the testing process. I also appreciate the clear visibility it provides into test execution results. I like how the centralized workspace helps keep our test assets organized, making it easier to track execution results. The platform integrates smoothly with our development tools, allowing us to run tests as part of our regular build process.
What do you dislike about the product?
Setting up more complex test scenarios can take time to learn. Some parts of the documentation could provide more detailed examples to help new users get started faster thou their support system is active to help
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate functional and API testing, reduce manual testing, and improve test coverage. The natural language approach simplifies test maintenance and boosts collaboration. With integrations like Jenkins and Jira, it fits smoothly into our development workflow.
Streamlined Testing, Minimal Coding
What do you like best about the product?
I like ACCELQ because it makes automation easier to manage without requiring a lot of coding, which helps different team members contribute to testing. I also appreciate that test design, execution, and reporting are all in one place, making it easier to track results and issues. Additionally, it helps us reduce the amount of repetitive manual testing, allowing us to automate regression tests to check system changes faster with fewer errors. The fact that it's a cloud-based platform made the setup fairly straightforward, and our team could start exploring its features without much infrastructure work.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that could be improved is the learning curve at the beginning. Some parts of the platform take a little time to fully understand, especially for new users. It would also help if there were more built-in examples.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate testing for our apps, reducing manual work. It helps validate changes quickly, ensuring functionality isn't broken. Automation without much coding allows team contribution, and integrated reporting makes tracking easier.
Simplifies Test Automation, Excellent for Functional and API Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like the natural language approach for creating test cases in ACCELQ. It makes the tests easier to understand and maintain, even for team members who are not deeply technical. The platform also provides clear visibility into test results, which helps the team track progress and quickly identify issues.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some areas of the platform take time to get familiar with, especially when setting up more complex test scenarios. In addition, the documentation could include more practical examples to help new users get started more quickly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate functional and API testing for web apps, reducing manual testing, improving test coverage, and identifying issues sooner. It ensures consistent tests across environments and provides clear test results for better tracking and issue identification.
Effortless No-Code Testing with Seamless Cloud Access
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate the no-code automation approach in ACCELQ. It lets our QA team create and maintain tests without having to rely heavily on developers, which definitely saves us time. The cloud-based setup is also great because it eliminates the need for infrastructure and lets us collaborate easily, with web and API testing available all in one place. Another thing that stood out is that it was quite easy to set up, thanks to the support system we could easily reach out to for help during the setup.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would say they could improve on report customization. The default reports are useful, but having more flexible options to customize dashboards or export details results would help teams analyze testing outcomes more easily. It would be helpful to have more flexibility in customizing reports and dashboards, like the ability to choose specific metrics, filter results by test cycle, or create simple visual summaries for different stakeholders.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
ACCELQ automates web and API testing, reduces manual coding effort, and accelerates test updates, enhancing our QA efficiency. The cloud-based platform enables easy team collaboration and test maintenance, saving time and infrastructure costs.
Effortless Test Automation with ACCELQ
What do you like best about the product?
I use ACCELQ mainly for automating our API and web application testing as part of our QA process, and it helps us manage both manual and automated testing in one place. What I like most about ACCELQ is its no-code automation and how easy it is for the team to start using it. Testers don't need strong programming skills, but they can still build and run automation tests. With ACCELQ's no-code approach, updates are much easier and the maintenance effort is much lower. Our team mostly uses the no-code test design features, which allow testers to create automation without writing scripts. We also use the API testing and web automation capabilities quite often. Having both on the same platform helps us cover different layers of the application without switching tools. The initial setup was fairly straightforward for our team since ACCELQ is cloud-based, so we didn't have to spend time on infrastructure or local setup. Additionally, it works well with CI/CD tools, so we can include automated tests as part of our build and release process.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think the learning curve could be improved with more beginner friendly onboarding materials. For example, step by step tutorials or short videos that show how to create a test from start to finish would really help new team members understand the workflow faster. One area that could improve is the learning curve at the beginning. Since ACCELQ has many features, it can take some time for new team members to fully understand the platform.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate API and web testing, reducing time and effort in test automation with its no-code approach. It lowers maintenance effort when APIs change and combines manual and automated testing, streamlining our Agile QA process.
Simplifies Testing with Powerful Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like how easy it is to create and manage automated tests in ACCELQ without heavy coding. It’s great that even team members who aren't developers can contribute to the automation process. The platform combining both manual and automated testing is a big plus, as it keeps everything organized and makes collaboration across our QA team smoother. I appreciate how it integrates well with our CI/CD and test management tools, fitting seamlessly into our workflow. The initial setup was straightforward since it's cloud-based, allowing us to start creating tests quickly.
What do you dislike about the product?
The main thing is the learning curve for new users - it can take some time to get familiar with all the features. It would also be helpful to have more built-in templates and examples to get started faster.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ to automate testing for web apps and APIs, speeding up tests and catching issues early. It reduces manual effort, especially in regression testing. Creating tests without coding lets everyone contribute, organizing everything for improved software quality.
Simplifies Test Automation and Boosts Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
The no-code automation is fantastic—any team member can build and maintain tests. I also like that manual and automated testing live in the same platform, which makes collaboration much smoother.
What do you dislike about the product?
The learning curve for new users can be a bit steep. It would help to have more templates and guided tutorials to get started faster.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It reduces manual testing effort and makes regression testing much faster. We can catch issues early, maintain tests more easily, and keep our releases stable.
showing 1 - 10