BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,225 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Web Automation Across Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack for web automation across different browsers, browser versions, and operating systems. My experience with BrowserStack is good, particularly appreciating the geolocation-based testing feature. It's really useful as it allows me to simulate tests from different geographies by setting the capability, which is very valuable for my testing needs. I also found the initial setup very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing as such
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for web automation across different browsers, versions, and OS. It solves geo-location testing challenges by allowing us to simulate tests from various geographies easily.
Easy, Seamless Recording with a User-Friendly Interface and Fast Test Case Creation
What do you like best about the product?
The recordings can be done easily, the interface is very user friendly and seamless. The test cases can be recorded quickly. We can use cloud services as well.
What do you dislike about the product?
Time tracking is not there, for processes which involves slowness tracking, expected data fetching time, browserstack is unable to cater those requirements. Sometimes the application is working but works slow due to incorrectly deployment method. This needs human intervention. Also, the complex cases where output varies , user is unable to automate the same.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack is enabling me to test generic cases which are BAU and not involve much change in behaviour every time it is executed. I can easily save lot of time depending on the complexity and duration of operation.
Effortlessly Tests Locations and Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ability to use different devices and GPS locations with BrowserStack. It's great for testing location-specific problems or bugs without having to visit the site. The initial setup was very easy, as I got an email invitation and it worked on the first occasion when signing in.
What do you dislike about the product?
onboarding could be better to teach the software
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing navigation applications, tackling location-specific issues by simulating routes without physically visiting sites. It solves GPS-related testing challenges and offers device and geographic flexibility.
Great Interface and Seamless Switching Between Automation and Test Management
What do you like best about the product?
The interface is great and the aility to switch between automation and test case management
What do you dislike about the product?
There is a ramp up time for a team to learn how to use it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
AI and the Low code automation and the ability to create automation scripts from hand written test cases
App Automate’s Interactive Sessions Save Tons of Debugging Time
What do you like best about the product?
The best part about BrowserStack, in my experience, is the interactive session in App Automate. It’s very useful and can sometimes save a lot of debugging time.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack in general is the new dashboard. I don’t find it very visually striking, and in some places the text overlaps with itself. Overall, it feels much less easy to use compared to the old dashboard.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem BrowserStack solves for me is access to multiple virtual devices with App Live. We sometimes run into device-specific issues in the app, so being able to test it across multiple devices helps me identify and fix those problems.
Efficient Mobile Testing with Multi-Device Support
What do you like best about the product?
I find it really beneficial that BrowserStack supports multiple types of devices. I appreciate that we can run our UI test cases on cloud devices, and it's convenient that we can set and run tests on multiple device types at the same time.
What do you dislike about the product?
I want to have more AI feature.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to run our UI test cases on cloud devices and test on multiple device types at the same time.
Essential for Cross-Device Testing, Lacks Some Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack mainly for mobile device testing, and it provides us with brilliant test coverage across a full and broad range of mobile devices. I really appreciate the capability to test on iOS devices with our website UI, as the Safari browser can render page elements differently compared to Chromium-based browsers. This allows us to catch those issues much earlier and avoid defects in production systems. Not having access to iOS browsers or devices in our dev and test team is challenging, but BrowserStack reduces the need to purchase these devices. They have all the latest devices, so we don't have to worry about the purchase cost and maintaining older devices to ensure backward compatibility. Setting up BrowserStack was also straightforward, with no problems at all.
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be good if it was possible to run automated test scenarios across a number of devices and have a detailed report response. Also being able to automate a visual comparison between the ideal design and the rendered view.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for comprehensive mobile device testing; it gives us great test coverage and helps us spot iOS-specific rendering issues early. It also eliminates the cost of buying and maintaining iOS devices for testing.
Saves Time on Test Cases, but Pricing Can Be Tough for Small Teams
What do you like best about the product?
It saves me a lot of time when I’m creating test cases, and it also makes it easier to connect to bug-tracking tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
When it comes to pricing, I feel that for smaller teams it isn’t really affordable.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I’m using BrowserStack for my test plans and test case management. It also helps me a lot when I need to do accessibility testing.
Easy Cross-Browser and Device Testing for Global Teams
What do you like best about the product?
Many of my team members are distributed globally, and they need to test across a range of devices and browsers. BrowserStack offers an easy-to-use interface that lets us access different browser and device combinations without any major upfront cost.
What do you dislike about the product?
At the moment, there’s nothing I dislike about BrowserStack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It’s a one-stop solution for all our testing needs across different devices and browsers, and it’s especially well suited for a distributed team.
Simplifies Cross-Browser Testing with Robust Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like how BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-environment testing easy without needing to maintain our own infrastructure. It provides quick access to a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and device configurations, allowing us to validate our application behavior efficiently across multiple environments. I appreciate how well it integrates with our automation workflow, especially running Playwright-based end-to-end tests, helping us detect compatibility issues early in the development cycle. The debugging feature with logs, screenshots, and session recordings is really helpful for quickly identifying the root cause of failures. The tunneling capability is invaluable for testing local or staging environments not publicly accessible. Furthermore, integrating BrowserStack with Percy for visual regression testing allows us to catch unintended UI changes and maintain consistent design across releases. Overall, BrowserStack significantly simplifies cross-browser testing, improves the reliability of our testing process, and saves time by eliminating the need to manually manage multiple test environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is very helpful overall, there are a few areas where improvements could make the experience even better. Occasionally, test sessions can be a bit slow to start, especially when running multiple automated tests in parallel. This can slightly increase the overall execution time of our test suites. Another area that could be improved is the debugging experience for failed automation runs. While BrowserStack does provide logs, screenshots, and recordings, sometimes it takes a bit of time to navigate through the information to quickly identify the root cause of a failure. There are also times when certain browser or device environments may feel slightly slower compared to running tests locally. Improving performance and reducing latency during live debugging sessions would make the workflow smoother. Additionally, clearer insights or analytics around test failures and performance trends could help teams diagnose issues faster. Enhancements in reporting and easier ways to analyze failures across multiple runs would make the platform even more powerful for larger automation suites.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack streamlines our cross-browser testing by providing instant access to various environments, simplifying the testing process. It helps detect browser-specific issues early, ensures consistent user behavior across platforms, and allows secure testing of local builds with its tunneling feature.
showing 511 - 520