BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,225 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Streamlines Cross-Browser Testing, Minor Latency Hurdles
What do you like best about the product?
I like the amount of available browsers and devices that BrowserStack offers, and I find its user interface easy to use. BrowserStack has sped up the process of cross-browser testing for me, solving the problem of having to juggle between multiple actual devices just to test. The initial setup was also easy; it was just a matter of finding the right plan and giving access to the right users.
What do you dislike about the product?
Mainly latency issue, maybe having servers available to more continents or countries to avoid any lagging issues, especially when testing animations.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of juggling multiple devices for testing, speeding up the cross-browser testing process.
Testing on Real Devices Enhanced by BrowserStack’s User-Friendly Interface
What do you like best about the product?
Testing on a Real device on different devices such as iPhone, iPad, tablets, and different browser versions. UI is very smooth and user-friendly and taking screenshots on different devices as an automation process.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, the local host application does not support BrowserStack's real devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
To test on real devices, BrowserStack is a super tool instead of carrying multiple devices. Good UI Testing tools as well test automation tool.
Efficient Mobile Testing with Minor Stability Issues
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack for its efficiency and ease of use. The platform has been a huge help in testing builds for mobile phones, allowing me to figure out if there's an issue with the file and perform tests much quicker and more efficiently, especially with debug enabled. I also appreciate the automation and mobile application testing features, which I find valuable.
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes things crash
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helped me identify file issues and enabled quicker, more efficient tests with debugging.
Fast, Simple, and Smooth Cross-Device Testing with BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is easy to use and makes my daily testing work smooth. As a manual tester, I use it every day to test apps on different devices, and it works well. Launching apps, installing builds, device response, UI performance, and switching devices all work smoothly. Device availability is also good. It is easy to implement and integrate with our testing process. If any issue happens, the support team is helpful and responds quickly. Compared to Kobiton, BrowserStack feels faster and simpler to use, which saves time and makes testing more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I dislike about BrowserStack is that when testing on multiple devices, if the internet gets interrupted or disconnected during execution, the device may freeze. After reconnecting, the device usually goes into loading, and only in rare cases it reconnects, that too sometimes only one device. Most of the time it disconnects after a few minutes of loading. Then we have to take the devices again and start the whole setup from the beginning, which takes extra time during testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the problem of needing many devices for testing. As a manual tester, I have to check the app on different devices and OS versions. It is not easy to keep so many physical devices. With BrowserStack, I can access many real devices in one place and test the app easily. I can launch builds, check UI, and switch between devices quickly. This makes my daily testing work faster and easier.
Real-Time Device Mockups That Make Testing a Breeze
What do you like best about the product?
Real time device mockup for both android and ios device
What do you dislike about the product?
Devtools is a bit slow therefore local testing is not feasible
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Real time device mockup for both android and ios device
Best-in-Class Location, Browser & OS Simulation for Web App Testing
What do you like best about the product?
The location, browser, and OS simulation is excellent. We use it to test our web application from different geolocations, along with various other settings. It’s also very easy to manage users and assign their roles.
What do you dislike about the product?
For some users, the cost could be a deciding factor, even though the feature list is extensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We can simulate the app for many countries and service providers. Our app is used globally by test takers, since we support 250+ countries, autonomous regions, and territories.
BrowserStack Makes Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Fast and Infrastructure-Free
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser testing without needing to maintain any local infrastructure. As a TA working on projects at the University of Limerick, I often need to check how my web applications behave across different browsers and operating systems. With BrowserStack, I can quickly run my automated tests on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on different OS versions without setting up multiple machines or virtual environments.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
Another thing I appreciate is the reliability of the real device and browser environments. The tests run on actual browsers rather than emulators, which gives me more confidence in the results. I’ve been using it to test some of my work projects and also verify functionality on a few UL-related websites to see how they behave across different browser configurations.
The integration with common automation frameworks is also very helpful. I’ve been able to run automated tests using tools I’m already familiar with, and the dashboard makes it easy to view logs, screenshots, and debugging information when a test fails. Overall, it saves a lot of time and makes cross-browser testing much more practical, especially when working on multiple projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
For smaller teams working on different projects, the pricing of some advanced plans might feel a bit high if you need access to more parallel sessions or additional features. That said, for cross-browser testing on real environments without maintaining your own device lab, it still provides a lot of value overall.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the problem of testing web applications across multiple browsers and operating systems without having to maintain different machines or complex local setups. Normally, ensuring compatibility across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge on various OS versions requires significant infrastructure. BrowserStack provides these environments in the cloud, which makes it much easier to run automated tests and verify that applications behave consistently.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
I’ve been using it to test my projects across different browser environments and occasionally check how some UL websites behave on different browsers. It allows me to quickly identify browser-specific issues and confirm that my applications work reliably without needing to set up multiple testing environments myself.
Effortless Browser Testing Across Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like the ease of spinning up new devices and easily being able to test web development applications across a broad spectrum of applications. It's really valuable to have access to real devices for testing, as it's not easy to get these kinds of devices. Being able to debug and find any kind of bugs and issues on specific devices is also very helpful to me. The initial setup was very easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
For the free tier, it could be more helpful to test on a few more devices and maybe a little bit longer. For the paid one, it could be helpful to manage more devices at the same time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing websites on devices I don't have, making it easy to spin up new devices and test web apps across a broad spectrum.
Effortless UI and Powerful Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like the UI and options that BrowserStack offers, especially because of its ease of use and clarity. I love using the BrowserStack Automate tool, and it was very easy to set up. IT set it up when I got my computer.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it's fine but improvements to keep up with current industry changes would be great
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing emails and sites. I like its easy-to-use UI and options, especially the BrowserStack Automate tool.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast, Easy, and Reliable
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing extremely easy without needing to maintain physical devices or complex virtual machine setups. The platform provides access to a wide range of real browsers and operating systems, which helps ensure that applications behave consistently across environments. The interface is intuitive, the setup is straightforward, and integrations with automation tools like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines work smoothly. It significantly speeds up debugging and improves confidence before releasing to production.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is very powerful, the platform can occasionally feel slower when running tests on remote devices compared to local environments. Session startup time and network latency can sometimes impact productivity when running many tests. Additionally, pricing can be relatively high for smaller teams, especially when scaling automation sessions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without maintaining a large in-house device lab. For development teams, this reduces infrastructure costs and eliminates the overhead of managing different environments. It helps catch browser-specific issues early in the development cycle, which improves software quality and reduces production bugs. For our workflow, it enables faster release cycles and allows the QA and development teams to collaborate more efficiently.
showing 441 - 450