BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,221 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Essential for Comprehensive Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for frontend testing and appreciate that it lets me test across different browsers and devices without needing to set them up locally, which helps me quickly catch compatibility issues. I like how easy it is to test across many devices and browser versions without much effort, making debugging ten times easier. I would say the initial setup was pretty straightforward and easy, and there's a lot of information available online about working with BrowserStack, making it much easier to set up and use. It's my go-to platform for different browser and mobile testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that didn't work well for me is the country selection during local testing and would like to see a solution for that.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test my frontend across different browsers and devices without setting them up locally, helping me quickly catch compatibility issues.
Fast, Real-Device Testing That Simplifies QA
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is most helpful for quickly testing across a wide range of real devices and browsers without needing to maintain that hardware internally. It saves time, makes cross-platform QA much easier, and helps us catch device-specific issues earlier in the development process. It is especially useful for verifying behavior on different OS and browser combinations in one place.
What do you dislike about the product?
Overall it is very useful, but performance and session setup speed is a bit slow compared to testing locally, however I'm not sure if anything can be done at this point.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of needing access to many different real devices and browser versions for testing. That benefits us by reducing the need to maintain a large internal device lab, making testing more scalable, and helping us identify compatibility issues before release. The variety of devices I can run tests on is one of the biggest advantages for our workflow.
App automate Makes Release Runs Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
App automate, with this feature you cam't focus on quality
What do you dislike about the product?
Random glitches during release runs. It really annoying
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Added custom iOS certificate to resolve websockets issue
Highly Effective Tool for Comprehensive Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile manual and automation testing, web automation, and manual tests as well as a test management tool. I like the various availability of different devices, which is really helpful for my testing needs. The App Live and Web Live features provide various mobiles and operating systems, which are great for my testing requirements. It also helps me keep the automation reports and tasks in pace. Shifting to BrowserStack has helped us be more organized and test case driven, and we're able to display testing coverage to clients more effectively.
What do you dislike about the product?
The testcase creation and test run management can be improved. The creation of reports needs to be improved. Also, the test cases should be updated when an automation test run is also updated. A field for adding the test data could be helpful along with steps and results. There is some minor issue during testcase creation from Jira, where the selecting of folder is not persisting. The reports generated sometimes do not cover the automation index. Also, the dark theme needs to be introduced. In addition, multiple TC ID tagging has to be provided. The JIRA integration has some issues while logging defects from the automation report.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack offers various mobile devices and OS options, keeping my automation tasks on track. Switching from Jira to BrowserStack has made us more organized and test case driven, improving how we show testing coverage to clients effectively.
Effortless Test Management with Cutting-Edge AI Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like the advanced features in BrowserStack like the Generate with AI, which helps generate testcase steps automatically, reducing manual effort. I use BrowserStack for testcase management and test runs, and it solves the difficulty in test management and helps in testing. Setting up BrowserStack was easy, and it is more manageable and efficient compared to what we used before. Overall, I find it very useful in conjunction with Jira for my work.
What do you dislike about the product?
I didn't find much but if BrowserStack also adds more features that support API testing, then that will be good.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for test management, solving difficulties in it, and the 'Generate with AI' features automate testcase steps, reducing manual effort.
Low-Code BrowserStack Test Management Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
Test Management
Low-code browserstack and
Low-code browserstack and
What do you dislike about the product?
mobile automation not supporting and also some support
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Test Stability and Debugging: Offers video recordings, screenshots, logs, and AI-powered fixes for flaky scripts, reducing manual debugging time
Maximum Devices Available, Great Flexibility
What do you like best about the product?
The maximum number of devices available, regardless of the number of users.
Customer support answers really fast
Customer support answers really fast
What do you dislike about the product?
It is a little bit slow sometimes, but I understand that it is a remote real device and can't be as fast as a real device in your hands
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing on different popular devices
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser & Device Testing Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
What i like best about browserstack is how easy it makes cross browser and cross device testing without needing to maintain any local setup. Best customer support from browserstack that will very helpful for me.And it’s something I rely on regularly for quick cross-browser and device testing. It’s convenient, easy to access, and fits smoothly into my daily testing workflow.And it’s quick to set up and doesn’t require complex configuration.And it connects smoothly with existing tools and frameworks, making it easy to include in the testing workflow without much effort.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside is that it can sometime feel a bit slow or laggy especialy when running test on real devices or during peak usage times
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack basically solves the headache of managing different browsers and devices for testing. It saves my time a lot, because I can quickly test everything in one place without setting up anything manually
Effortless Mobile App Testing with Diverse Options
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for live mobile app testing, and I love that it allows me to test mobile apps on different devices with various Android and iOS versions without having to physically purchase them. The best thing about BrowserStack is that it provides different ways to test an app, including uploading the APK, using TestFlight, or simply downloading the app from the Play Store or App Store. The initial setup was really easy, with everything clearly mentioned for the user.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel like when I am using TestFlight if there is a way to store my login credentials, it would be really helpful.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for live mobile app testing, allowing me to test apps on various devices with different Android and iOS versions without buying them. It offers multiple ways to test apps, like uploading APKs or using app stores.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing and Seamless Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like how easy it is to integrate automation using YAML config, which reduces effort in maintaining the automation pipeline. I find the new test management tool very useful for managing test case inventory, tracking test execution, and viewing coverage stats. I also value the test management feature because it helps organize and maintain our test case inventory efficiently, while making tracking test execution, reporting results, and monitoring coverage much easier. I appreciate that there was enough documentation provided by BrowserStack, making the initial setup not hard and quite easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area that could be improved is the test management section, especially with more advanced filtering and search options. Better filtering would make it easier to quickly find specific cases and manage large test inventories more efficiently. I wanted to search the test cases based on the name, right now it is not that much easy.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me test apps across browsers and devices without a device lab, integrating automation and CI/CD. I like the easy automation setup with YAML and the test management tool for organizing, tracking, and viewing coverage.
showing 391 - 400