BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,221 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing, Minor Speed Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I mainly use BrowserStack for testing websites across different browsers and real mobile devices during client projects. For example, while working on an e-commerce site, I used it to check how the layout behaves on Chrome, Safari, and Edge, as well as on iOS and Android devices.
It helps me catch issues like flexbox misalignment, spacing problems on smaller screens, and hover interactions that behave differently across browsers. I especially like the Live testing feature because I can quickly switch between devices without owning them physically.
Overall, it saves time and makes debugging much easier during development.
It helps me catch issues like flexbox misalignment, spacing problems on smaller screens, and hover interactions that behave differently across browsers. I especially like the Live testing feature because I can quickly switch between devices without owning them physically.
Overall, it saves time and makes debugging much easier during development.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside I’ve noticed is that the speed can sometimes be slow, especially during peak hours. Loading devices or switching sessions may take longer than expected, which can interrupt workflow slightly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
One major problem BrowserStack solves for me is not having access to multiple devices and browsers during my development only, Before i started using it i had to rely on my laptop and guess how a website would behave on safari or on SamSung Internet by switching through devices which do stress me out big time. Now that i use BrowserStack almost every time i'm working on any project, especially during the testing phase, it's easy to use and i don't need much setup to get started. The same example i use earlier where i use it for testing the e commerce website i build for a client, i was able to switch between devices quickly and identify the issue but before i had to break different devices together, i even had to use my friend old Tecno so check
Versatile Device Testing, User-Friendly Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate that there's so many devices available on BrowserStack for testing, including both Android and Apple devices. This is really crucial for us since all of our clients use different types of tablets, with some having older or newer versions, and some using Apple while others use Android. This capability to test on specific devices helps us reproduce and pinpoint issues that may occur only on certain devices. Additionally, the initial setup was really easy, allowing me to manage users without hassle.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think when my team first started, there were just so many options to choose from as far as testing. They had to reach out to me to find out, like, what option they actually chose to test. Like, there's just different avenues available, so there was just some confusion there. Maybe there's just a little more streamlined on the main page.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to reproduce bugs on specific devices, helping us address performance lags and non-working functionalities. Its device variety lets us test across client-used tablets, both old and new, ensuring issue reproduction isn't device-limited.
Multi-Device Access, but Customer Support Needs Major Improvement
What do you like best about the product?
different device availability across android and ios
What do you dislike about the product?
Customer support is became worst in recent days
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its really disappointing nowadays in terms of solving any issues faced by us
A Vital Tool for Comprehensive Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack because it has a good variety of devices, and I can really see how the experience is on those native devices. The initial setup was very easy, and it's been a great tool for us.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think easier access to the development tools and maybe some options for automated testing would be nice. I would really like to dive into that more.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to troubleshoot client-reported website issues on browsers or devices I don't have, like Microsoft Edge or Android. It offers a variety of devices to test and see the user experience on native devices.
BrowserStack Makes Day-to-Day QA Easier with Great Device Coverage
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack test management, LCA and App live is something which helps a lot in day-to-day QA tasks.
Wast support of devices helps in covering device versions on both iOS and Android
Wast support of devices helps in covering device versions on both iOS and Android
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to use LCA for mobile app automation, which is not yet available with all the capabilities.
Waiting for the major release.
Waiting for the major release.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across multiple real devices, browsers, and OS combinations without maintaining physical infrastructure. It helps me ensure better test coverage, faster debugging, and improved product quality with minimal setup.
Real Devices + Parallel Testing That Speeds Up Automation
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Browsers tack is the real device cloud. It lets me test our mobile application on actual iOS devices, such as the iPhone 13 and iPhone 14, without having to maintain physical devices myself. In my day-to-day work, I use it to verify barcode scanning by using the image injection feature after uploading the app to App Live. This approach helps me validate real-time behavior and catch device-specific issues more effectively. I also find the options to capture logs, screenshots, and session recordings very helpful, since they make debugging much easier. On top of that, support for parallel execution in automation helps reduce overall testing time.
What do you dislike about the product?
At times, device sessions disconnect unexpectedly or take a while to start, especially during peak hours. I’ve also noticed slight input and response delays when interacting with real devices compared to using physical devices directly. In addition, the availability of certain specific devices, such as particular iPhone models, can be limited from time to time. While the debugging tools are helpful overall, having more detailed logs for hardware-related issues (for example, external scanner devices) would make troubleshooting easier and improve the experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browser Stack addresses the challenge of testing applications across many devices and browsers without having to maintain physical infrastructure. It offers access to real devices in the cloud, which helps me identify real-world issues more accurately. The platform also supports parallel execution and automation, significantly reducing overall testing time. In addition, features such as logs, screenshots, and video recordings make it easier to debug and understand failures. Overall, it improves testing efficiency, saves time, and helps ensure better application quality.
Revolutionized Our Testing with Real-Time Cloud Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I really like the cloud devices on BrowserStack; they perform as expected with little difference from real devices. It feels like having a phone that's not in your pocket. The ability to track test execution in real-time with app automate is a huge plus. It takes away the stress from physical devices when running tests, allowing us to monitor executions anytime. Integrating with CI/CD pipelines and GitHub actions makes it seamless for app automation, boosting our efficiency in automation case execution.
What do you dislike about the product?
In recent times, we've had to automate some social media app features that require uploading images from a gallery. The cloud devices don't have a gallery feature, and if there were a way to add images to the gallery, our utilization of BrowserStack would be 100%. Also, the initial integration was a bit hard, and we had multiple discussions with the team to get it done.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We switched from Excel to BrowserStack for real-time test management, improving tracking. Cloud devices handle automation without slowing our local devices, and App Automate lets us monitor tests remotely.
Incredibly Easy to Use
What do you like best about the product?
How easy to use the platform is, its very intuitive
What do you dislike about the product?
It can be difficult to access certain dev tools on devices, such as macs & other apple devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We dont have to commit to spending alot of money on devices just for testing
Effortless Cross-Device App Testing That Exceeds Expectations
What do you like best about the product?
It makes it very easy to test apps and programs on a wide variety of devices, including iPhone, Android, Mac, and all types of Windows.
What do you dislike about the product?
Honestly, there’s really nothing to complain about. It does everything I need it to do, and even more than I expected. I love it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It lets me test the apps and programs I create on a wide variety of devices, so I can make sure my app is functional and works for anyone who might use it.
Effortless Multi-Browser Testing with Stellar Integrations
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack's ecosystem easy to use for testing with Karma and Jasmine. It's great for running automated tests and reporting status directly back to the CLI. The setup is straightforward with the Karma Jasmine plugin from npm, making it easy to ensure our merge requests and nightly builds maintain conformity and pass all the tests across various environments. I'm particularly impressed with the ability to test on multiple browsers like Chrome, Windows, Mac, Firefox, and Safari. BrowserStack provides a solid infrastructure for fast tests and offers a good environment that's easy to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think the Karma plugin needs improvement and maintenance from the BrowserStack team to be kept up to date. It's super useful and extremely good, and it could also have more features like more detailed reporting and more customization.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for automated tests on multiple browsers. It's easy to integrate with Karma and Jasmine, ensuring our merge requests and nightly builds pass across environments. The fast tests and good infrastructure make it great for testing.
showing 361 - 370