BrowserStack MCP Server
BrowserStackReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
3,221 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Fast, reliable cross-browser and device testing.
What do you like best about the product?
I love that BrowserStack gives instant access to real devices and browsers. No need to set up a device lab or fiddle with emulators. It’s super reliable for catching UI bugs and browser-specific issues, and the interface makes switching between devices and OS versions really smooth. It saves me a ton of time and makes testing much less stressful.
What do you dislike about the product?
Honestly, I don’t have major complaints. It works really well for my testing needs. Sometimes sessions can feel a bit slow, but overall it’s very reliable and smooth.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It lets you quickly test on real devices and browsers without managing hardware, helping catch bugs faster and saving a lot of time.
Streamlined Testing with Parallel Execution
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile and web-based cross-browser application testing. It eliminates the need for maintaining real devices and enables real device testing across multiple browser and OS versions. It helps me identify UI and cross-browser issues and supports parallel automation testing, which reduces execution time. I really like the cross-browser testing, parallel execution, and file upload mechanism. The parallel execution feature significantly reduces our testing time. Cross-browser testing helps us validate device functionality across multiple browsers and identify issues. The file upload helps in testing real scenarios like image or screenshot uploads. I also appreciate that BrowserStack integrates well with our CI/CD pipeline in Azure and allows us to maintain the test suite and execution in one place, providing better integration to see test results, execution, and reports.
What do you dislike about the product?
The file upload mechanism can sometimes be inconsistent with unsupported errors, and it does not support all file types. The max size is just 15MB, which can be increased. There are session timeout and disconnection scenarios.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack eliminates the need for maintaining real devices, enables real device testing across various browsers and OS versions, and supports parallel automation testing to reduce execution time. It helps identify UI and cross-browser issues effectively.
Essential Browser Testing Solution
What do you like best about the product?
I like the most about BrowserStack is when you can change the location. It helps me a lot with websites that are not accessible on Google, and it relates to accepting the business model of the websites. The initial setup of BrowserStack was easy, which was convenient.
What do you dislike about the product?
none
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me access websites not accessible on Google and lets me validate their business model by changing the location.
Easy Cross-Browser Testing and API Integration, But Limited Availability for Ubuntu
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is useful for me for web-based applications because I can create a simple script just by entering the URL in the appropriate section and selecting a browser such as Chrome, Firefox, or Safari. It’s also easy to install and to integrate with the API. Overall, I think it’s a good use of AI.
What do you dislike about the product?
As an Ubuntu user, I noticed it’s currently available only for Mac and Windows, which is disappointing to me.becuase of that i switched to window
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
if i'm talikng about problem solving, it just save time as we can create script for web based application and run it according to module wise.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Device Testing Fast with Parallel Runs and Broad Browser Support
What do you like best about the product?
The most amazing feature of BrowserStack is that it lets users access and use almost any mobile device without physically owning it. It also includes the latest devices, which makes it easy to stay up to date while testing. Another big advantage is the ability to test on multiple mobile devices at the same time (in parallel), which saves a lot of time. Almost all the browsers available in the market are supported on BrowserStack as well.
BrowserStack also supports automation testing for both mobile and web platforms. We can integrate TestFlight with BrowserStack for build generation, and I find this to be a very useful feature. For iOS devices, users can also simulate offline scenarios, which helps when validating app behavior under different network conditions.
And BrowserStack is super easy to use, even junior QAs can use it easily.
BrowserStack also supports automation testing for both mobile and web platforms. We can integrate TestFlight with BrowserStack for build generation, and I find this to be a very useful feature. For iOS devices, users can also simulate offline scenarios, which helps when validating app behavior under different network conditions.
And BrowserStack is super easy to use, even junior QAs can use it easily.
What do you dislike about the product?
A few things I dislike about BrowserStack are that, at times, it takes a long time to load mobile devices, which makes testing feel very slow. For Android devices, offline simulation still isn’t possible. As a user, I should be able to toggle mobile device settings and temporarily access the phone storage. Also, during peak hours, devices aren’t available. Finally, automation takes a lot of time as well, and it really should be faster.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The biggest problem BrowserStack solves is giving us access to mobile devices without having to own them physically. Multiple users on the same team can work in BrowserStack (mobile devices and browsers) at the same time, which makes collaboration much easier. With the TestFlight integration, iOS build generation has become very fast and straightforward. Overall, automation testing has also become much easier with BrowserStack.
Reliable Testing on Real Devices, Worth the Investment
What do you like best about the product?
its like very easy to use, and no need to use real devices for testing for both Cross-browser testing and multiple mobile devise application testing. And it is very easy to use no need local setup we can connect by remotely to many different devices with different Android versions. quick response from the customer support. its very easy for the small implementations which we wanted . And i have using frequently since from past 2 months without any major issue. and it can connect smoothly with existing different devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
some times few Samsung devices getting struck in between the testing phase. few mobile devices are not supporting for Playstore.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack tehnical team is very supportive in many ways like we wanted file uploads upto 100MB size, but initially it was max supports upto 50MB only. but based on my requirement they have increase the size from 50MB to 100MB.
Effortless Testing Across Real Devices and Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is its ability to test applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without needing physical hardware
What do you dislike about the product?
BrowserStack is that it can sometimes feel slow or laggy, especially when testing on real devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing applications across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems without needing to maintain physical hardware or complex infrastructure
Real Device Testing with Instant Access to New Releases
What do you like best about the product?
1. real devices and real testing
2. All the new devices are available instantly on release to the market.
3. Legacy/old devices are also available if anyone wishes to test on them.
4. Multi device testing is also supported.
5. Ability to test on multi browsers, all famous browser support is available.
2. All the new devices are available instantly on release to the market.
3. Legacy/old devices are also available if anyone wishes to test on them.
4. Multi device testing is also supported.
5. Ability to test on multi browsers, all famous browser support is available.
What do you dislike about the product?
1. Sometimes there is a slight lag especially with local testing which utilizes the existing VPN connection on your machine.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is solving the major problem on not worrying about the devices on which we are to perform the testing. And as browserstack is providing the real devices, we dont have to use any of the emulaters.
Accurate Real Device Testing with Easy Setup
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for real device testing, which helps solve the problem of inconsistent user experience. I really like the accuracy of real device testing, and it enhances performance testing by enabling early detection, which reduces debugging complexity. The automation feature is highly valuable to me, allowing parallel testing and facilitating automated browsing across all servers. I also find the real device coverage useful. The initial setup of BrowserStack was easy, allowing us to start testing immediately.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm not thrilled with BrowserStack's debugging limitations. I also feel like it could use deeper dev tools integration. On top of that, there's limited device coverage, which isn't ideal for testing across a broader range of devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for real device testing to solve the problem of inconsistent user experience. The accuracy and performance testing allow early detection, reducing debugging complexity. Automation and enabling parallel testing make my workflow efficient.
Essential for Cross-Platform UI/UX Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack in my UI/UX design field to check how my work looks on real devices like the iPhone, even though I'm using Android. It's amazing for designing cross-platform screens, ensuring they work on both iPhone and Android. I really appreciate how BrowserStack lets me catch layout or button breaks instantly, providing peace of mind by testing on real devices, which I can find easily. The Responsive Testing feature is essential for confirming my cross-platform design techniques. I find the Real Device Cloud particularly invaluable, as it turns my design goals into a reality with accuracy. I would highly recommend BrowserStack for anyone serious about UI/UX work, giving it a 9/10 for ensuring proper testing on real devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
None for now
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to check my designs on real devices, ensuring cross-platform functionality by quickly catching layout issues without stress. The Real Device Cloud and Responsive Testing enhance accuracy, giving me peace of mind.
showing 351 - 360