I understand I'm working with or using other tools besides Huawei, such as Windows, Office 365, Zoom for communication, Linux, and similar applications.

I'm using Office 365 because it's free, so there are signals besides Huawei that I work with or have used before.

I'm using it, and it's wonderful. It's custom made for Huawei, a special version of Office 365. It's not fully open to 3 Cloud or 365 because at Huawei, we have some restricted tools within Office 365. We use them just for email, Word documents, etc. We are not able to download or use online templates or download anything from Cloud. All those features are restricted. We're using only what Huawei provided as tools.

The application is custom made for Huawei, a special version of Office 365. It's not fully open to 3 Cloud or 365 because at Huawei, we have some restricted tools within Office 365. We use them just for email, Word documents, etc. We are not able to download or use online templates or download anything from Cloud. All those features are restricted. We're using only what Huawei provided as tools.

It has been fine regarding stability-wise issues, technical errors, and downtimes, but with Microsoft there are sometimes bugs, freezing, re-downloads, or redos. They have to reload the restrictive features and license. There was an issue from my PC itself, but the good thing is they auto-recover and auto-save, so when corruption happens, we can retrieve the latest version templates from Word, Excel, or PowerPoint.

Sometimes I use templates from different versions through copy-paste. When I want to save, I get prompts about text or fonts. I need to click again and apply something to be able to save the file. When I have different styles, it is very hard to track this. To avoid checking these optics every time I want to save the file, sometimes reason pop-ups appear when saving files, indicating projects have some strange text.

The value received is limited because I still rely on many third parties to do my work. It's not enough just to have Office 365, as I'm still dependent on some external tools.

Plugins and macros could be improved, such as Mouse broadcast and automation in Excel or SharePoint workflows.

More tools are needed, especially AI integrated features. This could be better in the Office 365 sixteen version. I'm using version eleven, but it still requires more enhancements, particularly in AI capabilities.

The download speed and safety need enhancement. At Huawei, we have WPS which is lighter, much better, and can adopt PDF files. As I don't have PDF capability in Office 365, I still need Microsoft separately. If Office 365 also includes PDF file capabilities, that would be perfect. WPS is much better as it has PDF functionality, scissors tool, and is more reliable.

I have never faced stability-wise issues, technical errors, or downtimes, but with Microsoft, there are sometimes bugs, freezing, re-downloads, or redos. They have to reload the restrictive features and license. There was an issue from my PC itself, but the good thing is they auto-recover and auto-save, so when corruption happens, we can retrieve the latest version templates from Word, Excel, or PowerPoint.

Sometimes I use templates from different versions through copy-paste. When I want to save, I get prompts about text or fonts. I need to click again and apply something to be able to save the file. When I have different styles, it is very hard to track this.

It is very common to have many different company topics from different slides. When you combine materials, you have different formats, and when you want to save, you get a prompt about unknown text or unknown fonts of file formatting. Every time you have to click save, there are pop-up boxes requiring confirmation, which can be annoying.

I never used that due to restrictions. I don't raise tickets to Microsoft if I have issues or questions.

I have been using it for a long time, from version eight to nine. I can debug issues myself because I know them, but I have to run through all slides and create fresh new templates or do manual work. I have workaround solutions, but when I have complex slides and multiple materials to combine, I get prompts when saving that require additional steps.

The overall rating for Office 365 is 7 out of 10.

I use Microsoft Security Copilot inside the company as it helps to assist in programming and document writing.

The main use cases for Microsoft Security Copilot involve searches. I have been using Microsoft Security Copilot for approximately one year.

Currently, I am using Copilot in programming, document creation, and information searching.

The feature of Office 365 that has significantly improved my team's collaboration is sharing cooperation with other team members or other teams. Working with the same document is more useful now.

A major efficiency gain enabled by Office 365 automated tools is that it helps with sharing documents and information, so efficiency can be improved substantially. Our company needs to share considerable information with the world and the China part. We mainly use Office 365 for sharing information.

Office 365 has AI capabilities that improve our processes, as we are using Copilot to assist us in writing documents. For example, we link up with Microsoft Teams, which helps to record scripts and wrap up meeting minutes.

For additional features that would make Office 365 even better, I think of better linking with Microsoft. Because we cross-sign, if Microsoft Excel could link up with a database, analyzing and getting information would be better.

I have been using Office 365 for a very long time, maybe over five years.

I have not faced any issues with the deployment of Office 365. It works smoothly because our company has an individual software vendor that can easily distribute new packages and handle software updates. As users, we do not need to handle upgrades for Office or Teams; they automatically run without requiring us to solve those issues for the department.

I am not looking for a new solution or already using something.

I have no experience with Jama Connect or any other Application Lifecycle Management tool. I inspect what is possible to use in the process only. We are just studying to see whether it is suitable for our process, looking around at all options. I do not have any planning to use this currently.

I am not sure if we bought it on the AWS Marketplace because this is handled by the MIS department. The whole package includes Microsoft 365, Copilot, Azure server, and software firmware.

We use more than two features automatically. Every time we face a problem, we can handle it. We might be using Copilot, not Security Copilot.

To integrate Office 365 in our daily business workflows, it is not really tightly integrated with Copilot or other systems; it functions as a typical office solution. We share information and use it for operation. We are using Office 365 for operation, development, documents, and information only. It is not deeply integrated with other systems Azure or management tools, so I am looking for any service that can be integrated with our program or process.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.5.

The team has already finalized the tool because the decision-makers are other teams and they have already onboarded some other tools for the patching.

For me, that is out of the box, as I'm not the right person to make their decisions. At the same time, I moved to another department, the application support team, which I'm currently supporting some applications.

In my use of Office 365, we have many different domains: exchange is different, Intune is different, Azure AD is different, and applications and services are different. I worked with the exchange Microsoft 365 exchange and then I worked with the defender with security, managing those defender things.

I also worked with the Intune team to manage the MDM deployment. Then I collaborated with the DevOps department to manage all those Kubernetes and DevOps and pipelines, checking the services. I was a middleman, checking everything, collaborating with all other departments.

This is where in Office 365 I worked around with them for 3 years.

For me, the most valuable features of Office 365 include eDiscovery, LDP, the security defender, the exchange, and many more.

If I can list it down, it would be a long list. Overall, it's really good. The management tools we have, such as device management tools, email management tools, and security management tools, every aspect is there. If we require any tools, we have them.

There is room for improvement in the exchange feature of Office 365. Sometimes users reach their emails quota; for example, if users receive a lot of emails and their quota has reached, they are not able to receive any more emails.

There is an archive service that Microsoft limits to 1 GB per day. This is a challenge currently faced by users. The migration part is also a bit tricky, especially from tenant to tenant or from third-party tools to Office 365, which relies on third-party tools to do the job. Improvements need to be made in this area.

I have used Office 365 for 3 years.

The deployment of Office 365 depends on the organization requirements. We can deploy it on the cloud for the exchange, but for some device management and from the user perspective, if the organization has on-premises servers, we can integrate it. If not, we can go for the cloud.

I would rate the stability of Office 365 ten out of ten. We do have some outages, but they are worldwide outages that happen very rarely.

The scalability of Office 365 is great, so I would rate it nine or ten out of ten. There are scenarios where we want to increase resources without affecting the current workflow, and it is feasible. It is very scalable.

Technical support from Microsoft really needs to improve because sometimes we have cases that drag on for months. I would rate it six or five out of ten.

I haven't used any different solutions before Office 365. In the earlier days, about 7 or 8 years ago, we used some exchange servers that were locally set up, and users were creating emails there in local AD servers.

After that, we moved to Office 365.

It is very easy. They have all the documentation we need; we can just Google it or simply download it from the Microsoft sites. It's very easy.

We are just a consumer. We do directly deal with Microsoft, but we have some vendors here in UAE who provide us all the solutions from Microsoft if we need them. For example, if we need our Office 365 licenses, if we need E5, E3, or whatever licenses we require, we have to have a vendor here in UAE, and they provide us with all the requirements.

In our company we have our own IT team for everything; we have a department for that. We are an MNC company operating in about 80 countries. They have very good staff, and because the main HQ is in UAE, the IT HQ manages everything from there.

It's more than 10,000 people using Office 365 in our organization, but I'm not sure about the exact number of staff we have.

I would rate Office 365 overall at eight out of ten.

Regarding the use cases for the product, it is used for all documentation purposes and computation purposes.

The complete Office 365 suite is used, and we have recently started using it for designing purposes because Microsoft Designer has launched. It is a great product to have. We also use it for Project Management.

The recent Microsoft 365 integration with Copilot is certainly very useful and effective, specifically for enterprise customers as it provides more than a 5x boost to productivity.

Within this suite, Microsoft Teams is another component that plays a big role. The way Copilot has been integrated into all the suites of the product, including Office suite and collaboration suite, creates a very effective combination that is being productively used within organizations and enterprises.

There is room for improvement to make Office 365 more affordable.

Pricing is the major concern because certain features are also part of some free suites that people are used to using in their daily life, which drives the demand for Office 365. If it would be commercially more viable and affordable for smaller and medium-sized enterprises, their suite would be one of the best suites.

I have been working with Windows for 35 years, which is the same period with Office 365.

The installation is quite easy, rating it 10 out of 10.

The solution is quite stable.

Since it is on-premises, the solution is one of the best and easiest ones, requiring minimal resources for management.

Support for Office 365 deserves nine points out of ten. The support is almost amazing.

From a productivity perspective, it is certainly saving time, but it is not saving money as similar work can be done with other Office suites available outside.

Regarding percentages and calculating ROI, it is difficult to provide specific figures.

To manage and maintain Office 365, deployment depends on the use cases. The complete suite is not needed on every endpoint.

For example, the Project Management suite is necessary only for PMO team members. Otherwise, just the Office suite is sufficient if they are not looking for the Designer component.

The integration with Copilot is a good example of AI integration. It would be beneficial to have open options to use any kind of AI that is available, apart from only being tightly integrated with Microsoft.

The Office suite can be integrated with many applications.

On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.

I mostly work with AWS. My team is working on bespoke applications and we're deploying it on AWS Kubernetes, mostly with EKS services. That's my scope at this time.

I have been working with Office 365 for three years. I mainly use Office 365 for collaboration and communication, mostly using SharePoint, MS Teams, and email.

I'm using Office 365 for collaboration and communication. Microsoft Teams is the most useful feature of Office 365 for me.

Microsoft Teams is the most useful feature of Office 365 for me. Since we are using a cloud base, for stability, I can rate it 8, because there are some performance issues and outages I've encountered. From my experience, in my environment, we are using mostly the Microsoft Office suite, MS Word, PowerPoint, and everything.

I think there's more advantage in using Office 365 compared to Google or AWS collaboration tools if you are using Microsoft in your productivity tools, due to the seamless integration. Office 365 does support my remote and hybrid workforce collaboration needs.

Based on my experience as a user, I think we are going into full integration with the Copilot, so hopefully this will improve functionality, but I haven't used it yet. I'm expecting more from the full integration with the Copilot for more automation.

In the future, it would be great to see full integration with the Copilot.

I have been working with Office 365 for three years.

From my user point of view, the initial setup and deployment process for Office 365 is seamless to the users.

Since we are using a cloud base, for stability, I can rate it 8, because there are some performance issues and outages I've encountered.

I think it's scalable, as long as you pay.

I'm not raising support, as it will be handled by another team, not on the user side.

I currently am no longer working with SAP in the past two years, as I moved to another area already, which was about three years ago.

From my user point of view, the initial setup and deployment process for Office 365 is seamless to the users.

I'm not raising support, as it will be handled by another team, not on the user side.

I think Office 365 is more beneficial for medium to enterprise company sizes, while small companies may not find it as beneficial.

For pricing, I think it's fairly priced, I would rate it 8.

I think there's more advantage in using Office 365 compared to Google or AWS collaboration tools if you are using Microsoft in your productivity tools, due to the seamless integration.

I don't want to publish my review on the PeerSpot platform in public, as much as possible. I'm okay with providing only my feedback without any personal details.

For my final points for Office 365, I would rate it an 8.

The main applications including Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint are my daily use cases with Office 365.

A lot of the features help us create more work, but Outlook is most helpful for me because I'm a remote worker, along with Teams.

The main benefit I receive from Office 365 is the ability to work with people remotely, so it's nice to collaborate online and share files that we might be working on together.

Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint are valuable features in Office 365 that I use daily.

Many features help us create more work efficiently, with Outlook being particularly helpful for remote work, alongside Teams.

The ability to work with people remotely, collaborate online, and share files are the main benefits I receive from Office 365.

There is not much I would improve for Office 365, though fewer updates would be nice.

I probably have many improvements I'd want to see, but nothing specific comes to mind.

I have been working with Office 365 since its adoption when it moved over.

I am not involved in the setup process for Office 365; we just get it deployed, and I don't know what issues the HR side has.

I would rate the stability of Office 365 at around eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Office 365 at ten out of ten.

I haven't contacted tech support from Microsoft personally; I notice really no complaints inside the system.

I have been an Office user for about 20 years, and the last application I used was Lotus Notes.

I am not involved in the setup process for Office 365; we just get it deployed.

The tech team primarily works with the implementation.

I did some research on PeerSpot about comparison between Cornerstone and LinkedIn Learning.

I have been an Office user for about 20 years, and the last application I used was Lotus Notes.

AI integration with Office 365 is currently under test in our organization.

We don't have many app integrations with Office 365, but it's something we're certainly looking at.

My name is Adam Stevenson, and I work for Stantec as a talent development advisor. My email is adam.stevenson@stantec.co.uk.

I am a real user of Microsoft products, not a partner, and I would prefer my opinion about Office 365 to be anonymous on the platform.

I am working with both Cornerstone and LinkedIn Learning because I'm working with HR tools and employee involving solutions, and needed research for a presentation.

I couldn't specify which cloud we are using for the deployment of Office 365.

I would rate Office 365 a 9 out of 10 for all products overall.

I am totally satisfied with the security part of Microsoft for that software.

I use Office 365 to make PowerPoint presentations, Microsoft Word to put together memos, and Excel for building financial models.

The most valuable features with Office 365 are Excel's robustness around financial modeling, which is super helpful for my job.

Office 365 brings a very strong return on investment through time savings and different efficiencies. We would never cut it as it is table stakes - it is necessary to operate in our world. The biggest KPI is functionality, specifically the ability to execute the work that needs to be done.

Office 365 could be improved in areas such as their collaboration functionality. I have used it before, but being able to work on documents in a cloud-connected manner with co-workers simultaneously would be super helpful. This feature is not available in the version we have.

I have approximately 15 years of experience with Office 365.

We haven't used a different collaboration tool before this; we've always had Microsoft. We currently have both Microsoft and Google Suite.

Some main differences between Microsoft and Google Suite are that Google is cloud native, enabling collaboration with people working on documents simultaneously. Google Sheets, compared to Excel, is not as robust. You sacrifice some robustness for sharing functionality. The same applies to PowerPoint versus Google Slides, where PowerPoint is much more powerful. The ability to work with others in a cloud native product is the selling point for Google Suite and represents a real benefit.

I would recommend Office 365 to other businesses due to its robustness and functionality.

We haven't been using AI in Office 365 for document management or data analysis because we don't have Copilot, which is their AI feature. It hasn't been integrated into our work.

My cybersecurity strategy primarily involves using CrowdStrike Falcon as an EDR solution, and currently, we are using it as an EDR. We are in discussion with the CrowdStrike team about having a managed SOC integrated as well.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon in the online industry.

The most effective feature I find for threat detection is the 24/7 managed monitoring, which is a next-gen antivirus and next-gen Endpoint Detection and Response. In Endpoint Detection and Response, the best part is 24/7, 365 continuous monitoring to the endpoint for identifying any suspicious activity.

It is a next-gen AV which does AI-based behavioral analysis to detect and take action on malware, ransomware, and other threats.

The automated response capabilities in CrowdStrike Falcon perform analysis based on the behavior of the activity. If it finds objectionable content or breaking of sitemaps, it uses an untraditional approach to block it. When suspicious activity occurs, such as detecting a file with a document extension that is self-replicating, the detection happens automatically. In cases of zero-day threats, such files are automatically put in sandbox for extraction and analysis to identify why it is classified as malware.

Falcon's integration capabilities with other tools enhance my security posture because it has a very lightweight agent, and having a unified console gives us complete visibility, including endpoints, servers, containers, and cloud workloads.

To improve CrowdStrike Falcon for the next release, I recommend that they should have a model where it works as an agentless solution. In terms of everything which agent pushes to the server or to the single console, if it could also have a feature where you can have other ports, which is SNMP or your network devices or OT devices, which you can specifically monitor, that would be great.

I have been working with CrowdStrike Falcon for more than 2 years now.

Regarding the setup, in my experience and our team's experience, it is fairly easy to install.

I would rate the setup an eight because we have a heterogeneous environment. For Windows, it is very straightforward and easy. For Linux, you need to automate it. If you have a bulk force, then you have to use some CMF or similar solution, which makes it a bit more complex, but overall it is fairly easy.

During these 2 years with CrowdStrike Falcon, I faced challenges, as everybody knows about the CrowdStrike outage. That was one significant issue, as it brought many Windows-related services to a halt due to one bad configuration push from CrowdStrike tracks.

Regarding stability, except for the incidents mentioned, I don't see any issues.

For scalability, it is easy to scale this solution for my company needs, and I would rate it a nine.

More than 7,000 users are working with CrowdStrike Falcon in my company.

Currently, we are 100% covered with CrowdStrike Falcon, but as the user base increases, we will certainly increase the license.

I have contacted CrowdStrike for support regarding the same incident, and my experience was pretty bad. There were people not knowing what was happening, how to mitigate it, or what to do. We were in a bad situation. After a couple of hours, their communication started flowing better, and things started improving.

My impression of the technical support of CrowdStrike, just for that particular instance, is less than four.

I have evaluated other options before working with CrowdStrike, including Carbon Black and SentinelOne.

When comparing CrowdStrike and SentinelOne, I don't see many advantages, but because of one particular problem, we had to give away SentinelOne. Otherwise, all three products are quite comparable.

Overall, it is a user-friendly tool.

CrowdStrike Falcon is definitely an expensive solution.

Since implementing CrowdStrike Falcon, I would say if it is protecting my environment, that fulfills my expectation. So far, I am happy.

For those who would to use CrowdStrike Falcon, I recommend that they need to negotiate hard on commercials because it is not an easy or affordable solution. From a commercial standpoint, they should negotiate hard. Technically, it is not a very difficult tool.

If we had not experienced that outage, I probably would have rated it ten. That incident gave it a very bad name because the support was inadequate. Many people might have decided to move out of CrowdStrike because of that incident.

My total rating for CrowdStrike Falcon is eight.

Some of the use cases I focus on include collaboration, communication, and information sharing as well as project management.

In terms of industries, I focus on health care and manufacturing.

Some of the most valuable features I found with Office 365 include Teams integration with various applications, allowing for the addition of various Teams apps into Teams channels for managing teams and collaboration.

The SharePoint integration has proven beneficial.

SharePoint impacts my project management by providing shared collaborative information where people can refer back to it without having to move the information around; you can just send links instead of needing to download documents all the time.

Currently, Microsoft can improve Office 365 by enhancing the persistence of the user experience from platform to platform and screen to screen, ensuring that wherever you log in, whatever you're doing, everything is still readily accessible and intuitive, as you left it.

I've had experience with Office 365 since it's been released, since its existence.

I rate Office 365 as reliable and stable. I haven't had any significant outages or application errors or failures, so once you put it in service in your enterprise, there's not a whole lot of product issues, mostly user issues.

I really don't go to technical support very often, as we usually handle our own in-house support, but when I've escalated to Microsoft on occasion, they've been very responsive, so I would say they're adequate.

I am familiar with other types of collaboration tools, such as Google platforms, although I haven't used them in a while, so it's come a long way since my last experience.

The main difference between Office 365 and perhaps Google is that Microsoft products are much better integrated across all those platform products.

Setting it up is fairly well thought out for the end-user experience at the moment, especially for the initial engagement. They've developed a lot of on-demand help and training resources for new and casual users, so I believe they've done a good job with it.

The return on investment is always an improvement. If they don't have it, it's a huge improvement going from no collaboration to a collaborative platform, and I think it's a significant improvement due to the many integration options available.

As for the pricing for Microsoft Office 365, it can always be cheaper.

The cost is probably at least in the upper two-thirds range.

I would recommend Office 365 to others.

Office 365 utilizes AI, and while it's just getting started, I think the integration is still in its beginning stages; there's likely to be a whole lot more integration across all the application stack within the next year or so.

Using AI has proven to be a good resource for creating a first draft when we start getting stuff started.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Office 365 a 10.

I use Windows on my notebook, and I also use Office 365, which includes Word and PowerPoint for documents and presentations.

We store our documents in SharePoint as document storage, but we don't use workflows in SharePoint because we mainly utilize ALM Jira for all our business processes; SharePoint operates mainly as a repository.

It's important to mention that when we are working on big reports, collaboration is key, allowing many people to work on the same document together.

I use both online and offline; some people do heavy editing on the web, but if I am working on big documents, I prefer to do it offline.

When I'm traveling, I definitely download all the documents on my notebook.

I should put my feedback mainly in Jira and Confluence, as these days I'm working around the clock.

With Office 365, I have never encountered issues; my experience is entirely positive.

We use Office 365, and colleagues download everything instantly; it's not about days.

It's very difficult to say how we can add more to our Microsoft experiences, as they are constantly improving and changing; regarding the stability of Microsoft products, I have no complaints.

With regard to Jira, when they implement new functionalities, quite often they deliver a product that is not stable enough; we can see this clearly, as sometimes something is not working, but this is about Jira, not about Office 365.

We are not using integrated Copilot, but our developers use OpenRoute a lot, which serves as a broker to interact with several AIs like ChatGPT and Google Gemini. I also know that some developers are using grounding.

I never think of integrating these technologies with Office because when it comes to programming questions, the developers are not using Word; they work in development environments like Eclipse or IntelliJ IDEA.

I have been working with this technology for approximately 10 years.

With Office 365, I have never encountered issues; my experience is entirely positive.

Regarding the stability of Microsoft products, I have no complaints.

I never contact Microsoft for support; Atlassian support contacts me quite often.

I remember other colleagues contacting Microsoft, but that was mainly about licensing questions, not anything technical.

Sometimes we are not happy with the price of available solutions, but when considering alternatives, such as OpenOffice, there's really nothing to compare. I know the formats of these open applications, but in terms of convenience and functionality, Office 365 is the only option.

In fact, it's not just a leader; Office 365 is the only real option we have now.

You can find us online at Enola-solutions.com.

I use Carmonda for business, along with several other tools.

I would rate it a nine out of ten; the only reason it's not a 10 is that the only comment I have is about the price. The functionality is perfect.