
Agentic Control Plane for Unified Exposure Management
Centralized visibility has streamlined risk-based vulnerability management and collaboration
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case for ArmorCode is centralized vulnerability management and security visibility, and we use it to aggregate findings from multiple security tools into a single platform to prioritize risk-based business impacts and to help the engineering teams with the most critical remediation activities.
ArmorCode helps our teams prioritize and manage those vulnerabilities by consolidating findings from different security tools into a single view, which reduces the effort of reviewing the vulnerabilities across multiple platforms. Providing risk-based prioritization allows the teams to focus on the potential high-risk impacts. It also helps collaboration between security and engineering teams by giving everyone a common view of vulnerabilities and remediation status, and overall, it makes the job easier for tracking and managing the remediation.
What is most valuable?
The best features ArmorCode offers are centralized security visibility and risk-based prioritization, the ability to correlate the findings from multiple security tools into a single platform, and the dashboards and reporting capabilities which are very valuable because they provide a clear view for the organization's security. Overall, the platform helps us reduce noise and improve prioritization, making vulnerability management more efficient.
The dashboard provides a consolidated view of security findings and remediation status for all the risk exposure, which makes it easier to understand the current security without switching between multiple tools. The reporting capabilities are very useful in tracking trends over time, measuring the remediation progress, and communicating the security metrics with different teams and stakeholders. Having the information centralized in an easy-to-consume format helps both security and engineering teams with better decisions and prioritization, making it more effective.
ArmorCode has positively impacted our organization with many positive outcomes, particularly in reducing the amount of manual effort required to aggregate and analyze the findings from multiple tools without needing to have a centralized view, which has prioritized it more efficiently. It has also improved collaboration between security and engineering teams because everyone is working on the same data and priorities. While I don't have the exact metrics available, we have definitely seen time savings on vulnerability review, remediation tracking, and security reporting activities.
We have found ArmorCode's output to be accurate and reliable. The integration with underlying security tools gives us confidence in the results. The benefit is that it helps reduce duplicate findings and provides better context around the risk, making it easier to focus on meaningful issues over time. We have seen improvements in consistency and efficiency in reviewing and prioritizing security findings, which has helped streamline our remediation process.
What needs improvement?
Features that I would like to see included for this application are more advanced customization options for dashboards and reporting, especially for different stakeholder groups, and additional out-of-box integrations. I would also recommend the incorporation of AI-assisted recommendations for vulnerability prioritization and remediation guidance, which would be more valuable.
One area that I would see for improvement in ArmorCode is the need for out-of-box integrations that I have already mentioned. Another area would be greater customizations with the dashboards, as organizations need different views for security engineering and leadership. I would also like to see the usage of AI-enhanced remediation prioritization recommendations, as these are the main areas I would love to see in ArmorCode.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using ArmorCode for the last two to three years, and it is part of our security application security environment.
What other advice do I have?
I don't have anything major to add regarding improvements beyond what I mentioned regarding the use cases.
ArmorCode is deployed in our organization primarily in a hybrid cloud environment, with applications and services running across public cloud platforms. ArmorCode helps us provide a centralized view, so it is primarily on the public cloud platforms.
My advice to others looking into using ArmorCode is that the platform is solid, and as I mentioned multiple times, the centralized view implementing ArmorCode delivers the most value in aggregating findings from multiple security tools and managing vulnerabilities in a centralized way, which helps both operational, engineering, and security teams to prioritize work. The platform itself is very solid and could significantly improve visibility and prioritization when integrated properly into the organization's security operations. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.