BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,227 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Easy Real-Device Testing with Powerful Analytics and AI Test Case Generation
What do you like best about the product?
It’s very easy to test on real devices without having to manage any hardware myself. The test management and analytics tools, along with the AI test case generation features, really help speed up testing and improve coverage. It also integrates well with Selenium, which makes automation smoother and the overall workflow more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initially, I faced some issues integrating BrowserStack with my GitHub repo. It took about 2-3 days to resolve, but their support team was helpful and guided me through it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps me solve the challenge of testing across multiple devices, browsers, and OS versions without needing to maintain physical setups. It saves a lot of time and effort, and it lets me catch compatibility issues early, which improves the overall quality of my releases.
Easy Mobile Testing That Helps Backend Developers Move Faster
What do you like best about the product?
it is very easy for the mobile testing and help the backend developer to test the feature on mobile
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it keeps disconnecting when I'm inactive, even for a short time
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps me do the mobile testing/developing without installing the simulator.
Effortless Cross-Browser Testing on Real Devices—No Infrastructure Needed
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is that it lets me test applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers, without having to maintain any physical infrastructure.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only thing I dislike is that the performance can be inconsistent, especially when I’m using real devices.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the challenge of testing applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems, without having to maintain a physical device lab.
Scaling Mobile Testing with BrowserStack and CI/CD Integration
What do you like best about the product?
Testing our mobile application on real devices has been a game changer for us. With a limited number of test engineers, validating the app across multiple devices and OS versions is a significant challenge. BrowserStack simplifies this by giving us seamless access to real devices, along with the flexibility to select device types and OS versions at runtime. Our tests run automatically every time code is merged into our QA branch, and when combined with our CI/CD pipeline, running tests across a wide range of mobile devices becomes effortless and stress-free. The automated test report emails further add value by allowing us to quickly distribute results to the team without any manual intervention. Way to go, BrowserStack!
What do you dislike about the product?
There’s very little downside to call out. One enhancement we’d love to see is AI‑driven suggestions to optimize test execution time. We occasionally receive feedback that our pipelines take longer to complete, and it would be extremely helpful if BrowserStack could predict test run times and recommend—or even automatically adjust—the number of parallel threads to reduce overall execution time. This kind of intelligent optimization would add significant value.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of effectively testing mobile applications across a wide range of real devices and OS versions, which would otherwise be difficult and resource‑intensive—especially with a limited number of test engineers. Maintaining and managing physical devices in‑house is not scalable, and ensuring adequate test coverage across device and OS combinations is a constant struggle. Indirectly, it removes the need to hire additional resources or reduce testing scope due to resource limitations.
By providing on‑demand access to real devices, BrowserStack eliminates these constraints and gives us the flexibility to choose device types and OS versions at runtime. This has significantly improved our test coverage and confidence in application quality.
By providing on‑demand access to real devices, BrowserStack eliminates these constraints and gives us the flexibility to choose device types and OS versions at runtime. This has significantly improved our test coverage and confidence in application quality.
Reliable Real-Device Testing That Streamlines Cross-Browser Validation
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it enables real-device and cross-browser testing without needing to maintain any physical infrastructure. It saves a lot of setup time and allows quick validation across multiple environments, which is critical for catching compatibility issues early. The platform is reliable, easy to use, and integrates well with automation tools, making both manual and automated testing much more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside of BrowserStack is that sessions can sometimes feel slow or laggy, especially on real devices or under heavy load. It can also be a bit expensive for smaller teams, and parallel testing limits can become a bottleneck. Occasionally, debugging issues on remote devices is harder compared to local testing, and there can be minor inconsistencies or flakiness in automated runs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of testing across multiple browsers, devices, and OS combinations without the need to maintain a large physical device lab. It eliminates infrastructure overhead and helps catch cross-browser and real-device issues early in the development cycle.
For me, it significantly improves testing efficiency by enabling quick validation across environments, reduces release risk by identifying compatibility issues sooner, and supports faster debugging through easy access to logs, screenshots, and recordings. It also helps scale both manual and automated testing, which is especially useful in fast-paced development environments.
For me, it significantly improves testing efficiency by enabling quick validation across environments, reduces release risk by identifying compatibility issues sooner, and supports faster debugging through easy access to logs, screenshots, and recordings. It also helps scale both manual and automated testing, which is especially useful in fast-paced development environments.
Helpful for Testing and Automation with Multiple Devices
What do you like best about the product?
Yes during testing, able to test on multiple devices.
During automation also it was helpful.
During automation also it was helpful.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it has performance issue - It fails for any reasons. Limited debugging on real devices
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It eliminated the need of real devices for testing or automation.
Reliable Multi‑Tool Support for Modern Test Automation
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is a solid automation platform that supports multiple automation tools. I initially worked with Selenium and later moved to Playwright, and the transition was completely seamless because BrowserStack provides excellent compatibility with both. It also allows parallel execution of test cases, which significantly reduces the overall run time.
Another standout feature is the video recording generated after each UI test execution. When a test fails, these recordings make it much easier to identify and debug issues quickly. Along with that, BrowserStack supports a wide range of desktop browsers as well as real mobile devices, which is a major advantage for comprehensive cross‑platform testing.
Another standout feature is the video recording generated after each UI test execution. When a test fails, these recordings make it much easier to identify and debug issues quickly. Along with that, BrowserStack supports a wide range of desktop browsers as well as real mobile devices, which is a major advantage for comprehensive cross‑platform testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasionally, BrowserStack sessions can be a bit flaky. At times, a remote session may disconnect or behave unpredictably, which can lead to false test failures and require reruns.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack addresses several key testing challenges for me. It eliminates the need to maintain a physical device lab by providing access to a broad range of real browsers and mobile devices, which supports accurate cross‑platform testing without the usual setup overhead. It also takes care of infrastructure management, so I can focus on writing tests rather than spending time configuring environments. Parallel execution helps speed up the overall test cycle, and the detailed logs and video recordings make debugging significantly easier. Overall, it enables faster, more reliable automation with minimal ongoing maintenance effort.
Reliable Cross-Device Testing with Easy Bug Capture and Screen Recording
What do you like best about the product?
Testing works well across different real devices and browsers. I like that there are options to capture bugs and do screen recordings when needed. It’s also helpful that I can test on two mobile devices simultaneously. We get better customer support and I use BrowserStack frequently for testing and I would like to explore the Implementation and Integration aspects of browserstack in the future.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes I notice lag and sensitivity issues. On one occasion, I ran into a problem where my iPhone 17 Pro Max wouldn’t launch properly or boot up.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing works smoothly across different real devices and browsers. I also find it helpful that I can test on two mobile devices at the same time. It saves me the time and effort of downloading and installing multiple browsers, as well as setting up and managing different real devices.
Great Cross-Environment Visibility Without Engineering Help Every Single Time
What do you like best about the product?
It gives the team visibility into how the product looks and behaves across different environments without needing to loop in engineering every time to check
What do you dislike about the product?
The report dashboards could be more intuitive for non-engineering stakeholders. It takes a bit of digging to pull out summary-level insights that matter for product decisions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It reduces the back and forth between product and engineering around compatibility issues, and also gives our PM team enough visibility into QA status to make informed release calls without being blocked on technical updates.
Revolutionizes Testing Across Multiple Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing applications on multiple devices, which is great because it allows me to run multiple devices in parallel. This feature really helps reduce my workload and save time, especially when I need to compare iOS and Android apps. Additionally, I like that the initial setup of BrowserStack is easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
pricing looks little bit high for individual.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing applications on multiple devices. It helps me avoid relying on my computer, runs multiple devices in parallel to solve load and time issues, and assists greatly in comparing iOS and Android apps.
showing 21 - 30