BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,228 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
We use BrowserStack for cross-browser testing and debugging. BrowserStack has been a reliable tool for testing across multiple browsers and devices without the hassle of maintaining physical infrastructure. The platform makes it easy to validate and understand how our sites perform in different environments. It significantly speeds up the QA process. Setting up BrowserStack was easy for our team, and we adapted quickly. Everything is good for us, and we don't feel any challenges using BrowserStack.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are occasional performance lags during peak usage, improving session stability might resolve this problem.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser testing and debugging, making it easy to validate applications across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining physical infrastructure, significantly speeding up the QA process.
Instant Access to Real Devices Without the Hardware Hassle
What do you like best about the product?
Honestly, the best part is just not having to manage a drawer full of physical devices. I can jump into a real iPhone or an obscure Android version in seconds. The latency is low enough that it actually feels like you're using the device, which is a lifesaver for quick CSS fixes.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can be quite expensive for smaller teams. Also, the performance isn't always 1:1 with a local device—scrolling and animations can feel a bit choppy sometimes depending on the connection.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the massive headache of device fragmentation. We can't realistically buy every iPhone and Android model that comes out, let alone maintain them. BrowserStack gives us instant access to a huge cloud of real hardware, which means we can ship features confidently knowing they actually work on a customer’s specific phone, not just a simulator.
Intuitive Cross-Browser Testing with Some Lag
What do you like best about the product?
I like how BrowserStack makes testing easy by allowing me to spin up a new device seamlessly. The user experience is straightforward, making it easy for anyone to adapt. The intuitive interface allows me to switch from portrait to landscape quickly with just one click. I also appreciate that BrowserStack offers more features compared to the previous product I used, LambdaTest.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance lag, pricing concerns, and session startup. The stream feels quite laggy during peak usage hours.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing on actual devices, making it easy to check issues on specific models like Pixel 8. The seamless user experience and intuitive interface make switching modes and setting up new devices effortless.
Clean, User-Friendly UI
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most is how easy it is to implement, along with the wide variety of features it offers.
What do you dislike about the product?
It could use more features, and the customer support could be better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
help us eliminate the need to maintain a large in house device lab by providing instant access to real devices and browsers
Buffer-Free Execution Videos Make Debugging and Test Management Important Feedbacks
What do you like best about the product?
It’s easy for me to debug my automation failures because it records a buffer-free video of my automation execution. I use the test management feature, which helps me track bugs and execute cases easily. The test management tool also helps me configure my cases according to different platforms, and even adjust the same cases based on the platform requirements.
Migrating our manual cases is also very easy, which reduces the effort of writing cases again when they’re already present. I use test runs frequently, as I execute manual execution through BrowserStack. The customer support team also tries to provide the best solution possible.
Migrating our manual cases is also very easy, which reduces the effort of writing cases again when they’re already present. I use test runs frequently, as I execute manual execution through BrowserStack. The customer support team also tries to provide the best solution possible.
What do you dislike about the product?
- Integrating jira with our project for each user separately
- existing bugs in test management tool
- iframe of browserstack in the jira tool
- Bug raising to jira through browserstack
- existing bugs in test management tool
- iframe of browserstack in the jira tool
- Bug raising to jira through browserstack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Earlier, our team used Google Sheets for manual test case execution, which came with a few drawbacks: we couldn’t easily track execution history, we had limited visibility into overall progress, and assigning different cases to different team members was not very smooth. Now, with the BrowserStack test management tool, we have configurations that make it feasible to assign different cases to different people, and we can also see the edit history of test case execution.
Another major improvement is around bug reporting. With Google Sheets-based execution, we had to raise bugs directly in Jira and then later map them back to the relevant cases again. With BrowserStack, Jira issues can be raised from the same tool, which saves significant time.
That said, I do have a few pieces of feedback from a QA perspective that I feel should be improved, since they are frequent, time-consuming areas and currently feel like gaps in an end-to-end QA execution journey.
Another major improvement is around bug reporting. With Google Sheets-based execution, we had to raise bugs directly in Jira and then later map them back to the relevant cases again. With BrowserStack, Jira issues can be raised from the same tool, which saves significant time.
That said, I do have a few pieces of feedback from a QA perspective that I feel should be improved, since they are frequent, time-consuming areas and currently feel like gaps in an end-to-end QA execution journey.
Fast, Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Instant Real Device Access
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack makes cross-browser testing simple by giving instant access to real devices and browsers without setup. It’s fast, reliable, and easy to use, which saves a lot of time
What do you dislike about the product?
The visual quality of the website could be improved, especially on Mac, as it sometimes doesn’t appear as sharp or high-definition as expected.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve cross-browser testing issues by providing easy access to different environments. I initially faced a problem accessing browser testing on Mac, but their support team guided me step by step to resolve it. This helped me quickly get back on track and continue testing without delays.
Excellent Cross-Browser & Device Testing Experience
What do you like best about the product?
Cross browser testing and different devices emulators provided.
Test management is also better.
Test management is also better.
What do you dislike about the product?
Can provide more time for free plan to explore.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cross browser testing.
Test Management tool.
Test Management tool.
Fast, Real-Device Testing That Simplifies QA
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack is most helpful for quickly testing across a wide range of real devices and browsers without needing to maintain that hardware internally. It saves time, makes cross-platform QA much easier, and helps us catch device-specific issues earlier in the development process. It is especially useful for verifying behavior on different OS and browser combinations in one place.
What do you dislike about the product?
Overall it is very useful, but performance and session setup speed is a bit slow compared to testing locally, however I'm not sure if anything can be done at this point.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the problem of needing access to many different real devices and browser versions for testing. That benefits us by reducing the need to maintain a large internal device lab, making testing more scalable, and helping us identify compatibility issues before release. The variety of devices I can run tests on is one of the biggest advantages for our workflow.
Highly Effective Tool for Comprehensive Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for mobile manual and automation testing, web automation, and manual tests as well as a test management tool. I like the various availability of different devices, which is really helpful for my testing needs. The App Live and Web Live features provide various mobiles and operating systems, which are great for my testing requirements. It also helps me keep the automation reports and tasks in pace. Shifting to BrowserStack has helped us be more organized and test case driven, and we're able to display testing coverage to clients more effectively.
What do you dislike about the product?
The testcase creation and test run management can be improved. The creation of reports needs to be improved. Also, the test cases should be updated when an automation test run is also updated. A field for adding the test data could be helpful along with steps and results. There is some minor issue during testcase creation from Jira, where the selecting of folder is not persisting. The reports generated sometimes do not cover the automation index. Also, the dark theme needs to be introduced. In addition, multiple TC ID tagging has to be provided. The JIRA integration has some issues while logging defects from the automation report.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack offers various mobile devices and OS options, keeping my automation tasks on track. Switching from Jira to BrowserStack has made us more organized and test case driven, improving how we show testing coverage to clients effectively.
Effortless Test Management with Cutting-Edge AI Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like the advanced features in BrowserStack like the Generate with AI, which helps generate testcase steps automatically, reducing manual effort. I use BrowserStack for testcase management and test runs, and it solves the difficulty in test management and helps in testing. Setting up BrowserStack was easy, and it is more manageable and efficient compared to what we used before. Overall, I find it very useful in conjunction with Jira for my work.
What do you dislike about the product?
I didn't find much but if BrowserStack also adds more features that support API testing, then that will be good.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for test management, solving difficulties in it, and the 'Generate with AI' features automate testcase steps, reducing manual effort.
showing 211 - 220