BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,227 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Cross-Device Testing with Real-Time Interaction
What do you like best about the product?
I love how BrowserStack allows me to test apps on different devices without needing multiple physical devices. The real-time interaction feature is great because it lets me test and debug without needing to be physically present with the devices. Manual testing works well with this feature. It's been really easy to use, and I found the setup straightforward after looking at the docs. I would definitely recommend it to others because it's such a helpful tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing on multiple devices without physically having them, allowing real-time interaction to test and debug apps effectively.
Quick Learning Curve, Diverse Device Access
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack's cloud-based option great for working efficiently with my team. Its quick and easy learning curve allows us to start working immediately without dealing with complex setup or infrastructure maintenance, which is really valuable. I appreciate the access to over 30,000 devices with the real device cloud app, and Percy is fantastic for functional testing. Overall, BrowserStack makes testing new stuff with my team a much smoother process.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the translation. Maybe be more accurate on certain type of words or slang.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack's cloud-based option enables efficient teamwork, eliminating complex setup and infrastructure maintenance. The quick learning curve allows the team to start immediately, enhancing collaboration and productivity.
Effortless Real-Device Testing That Speeds Up Every Release.
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is its strong automation support and real-device testing.
Running automated tests in parallel really speeds up our regression cycles and fits smoothly into CI/CD workflows. It helps us move faster without compromising quality.
Real-device testing is another major advantage. Being able to validate real user scenarios—like gestures, uploads, and device-specific behavior—gives me much more confidence than relying on emulators.
Overall, these capabilities make testing faster, more reliable, and much closer to real user conditions.
Running automated tests in parallel really speeds up our regression cycles and fits smoothly into CI/CD workflows. It helps us move faster without compromising quality.
Real-device testing is another major advantage. Being able to validate real user scenarios—like gestures, uploads, and device-specific behavior—gives me much more confidence than relying on emulators.
Overall, these capabilities make testing faster, more reliable, and much closer to real user conditions.
What do you dislike about the product?
There’s nothing major to dislike about BrowserStack. In some cases, sessions can feel a bit slow depending on the network or device load, but it isn’t a consistent issue.
Overall, it works reliably, and these are minor points that don’t impact day-to-day testing very much.
Overall, it works reliably, and these are minor points that don’t impact day-to-day testing very much.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the challenge of testing applications across different browsers and real devices without having to maintain a physical device lab.
Rather than managing multiple setups and environments, we can run our tests in one place. This saves time, reduces infrastructure overhead, and makes the overall testing process much more efficient.
It also helps us catch device-specific and browser-related issues early, which improves product quality and supports a more consistent user experience across platforms.
Rather than managing multiple setups and environments, we can run our tests in one place. This saves time, reduces infrastructure overhead, and makes the overall testing process much more efficient.
It also helps us catch device-specific and browser-related issues early, which improves product quality and supports a more consistent user experience across platforms.
Seamless Cross-Device App Testing Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
Seamlessly switching between devices to test apps. It allows me to replicate the devices my customers use and troubleshoot technical issues more conveniently.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are instances when it freezes and stops working. The only fix for it is to refresh the page and start from the top.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- BrowserStack provides instant access to real devices and multiple browsers, saving setup time and reducing environment inconsistencies.
- Automated testing with BrowserStack speeds up test execution, allowing faster feedback and shorter release timelines.
- Parallel testing across devices increases coverage and catches issues earlier, improving app quality and user experience.
- Automated testing with BrowserStack speeds up test execution, allowing faster feedback and shorter release timelines.
- Parallel testing across devices increases coverage and catches issues earlier, improving app quality and user experience.
Streamlined Testing with Intelligent Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack to test our mobile app and website functionality. It helps us by allowing automated tests, which cuts down the time required by QA team members to run tests. I particularly like the benchmark/threshold marking feature, which alerts us if there are regular errors or issues with stability while ignoring expected failures in certain areas. It's quite intelligent in that way. The initial setup was really simple, and the trial period was useful.
What do you dislike about the product?
The management interface can be a bit sluggish. For mobile app testing certain model phones are only unlocked with more expensive plans.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test our app and website functionality, automating tests to cut down QA time. The benchmark feature helps by alerting us to unexpected issues while ignoring expected failures.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast and Scalable
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is how it simplifies cross-browser and cross-device testing without requiring me to maintain physical devices. It offers a smooth, reliable way to test applications across a broad range of real devices and browsers, which saves a lot of time and effort. I also find it especially useful for catching compatibility issues early in the development cycle. On top of that, its integration with automation tools improves efficiency and makes it easier to scale testing for real-world projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
Latency during real-device testing can become a real bottleneck in fast-paced sprints. On top of that, the entry-level pricing feels quite steep for startups, and the automatic session timeouts can be disruptive—especially when I’m trying to debug more complex issues.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It removes the huge overhead of maintaining an internal device lab. With BrowserStack, we can quickly verify cross-platform UI consistency, which has noticeably sped up our QA cycles.
Flagship Real Device Testing Made Easy with Reliable Network Simulation
What do you like best about the product?
Real device testing on the latest flagships (Galaxy S26 Ultra, iPhone 17 Pro) without having to maintain a physical device lab. The network simulation API lets us reliably test offline scenarios, and the debug mode plus network logs make it much easier to diagnose flaky tests. Jenkins CI integration is straightforward—our pipeline automatically spins up test instances on BrowserStack and runs our test suites end to end.
What do you dislike about the product?
You’d know this best—are there any pain points you’ve run into? For example: slow queuing, flaky sessions, pricing concerns, or issues with the dashboard UX?
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps us test our mobile app on real iOS and Android devices without having to maintain a physical device lab. We can run E2E tests on the latest flagships (iPhone 17 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra), which would otherwise be expensive and time-consuming to manage in-house.
The key problems it solves for us are device availability and coverage. We get instant access to real devices running the latest OS versions (Android 16, iOS 26) without the procurement, setup, or ongoing maintenance overhead. It also improves cross-platform parity: we run the same Appium/WebdriverIO test suites on both platforms, which helps us confirm consistent behavior across Android and iOS.
Network condition testing is another big win. BrowserStack's network simulation API lets us reliably test offline/online scenarios, which is critical for our field-use mobile app. On the CI/CD side, our Jenkins pipeline triggers BrowserStack test runs automatically, so we get continuous feedback without tying up local infrastructure.
Finally, debugging in the cloud is genuinely useful. The built-in debug mode and network logs make it much easier to diagnose failures on remote devices, almost as if they were local. Overall, the main benefit is speed and confidence: we can validate every build on real devices in CI without maintaining any hardware.
The key problems it solves for us are device availability and coverage. We get instant access to real devices running the latest OS versions (Android 16, iOS 26) without the procurement, setup, or ongoing maintenance overhead. It also improves cross-platform parity: we run the same Appium/WebdriverIO test suites on both platforms, which helps us confirm consistent behavior across Android and iOS.
Network condition testing is another big win. BrowserStack's network simulation API lets us reliably test offline/online scenarios, which is critical for our field-use mobile app. On the CI/CD side, our Jenkins pipeline triggers BrowserStack test runs automatically, so we get continuous feedback without tying up local infrastructure.
Finally, debugging in the cloud is genuinely useful. The built-in debug mode and network logs make it much easier to diagnose failures on remote devices, almost as if they were local. Overall, the main benefit is speed and confidence: we can validate every build on real devices in CI without maintaining any hardware.
Essential for Comprehensive Cross-Platform Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I love that BrowserStack offers many devices to test on, which is crucial for when I lack real device support. The ability to rotate the device is handy, and the logging functionality is very useful. I also appreciate that I can use tablets in addition to regular mobile devices. These features significantly boost my testing activities as a QA at work.
What do you dislike about the product?
More devices, especially, not that popular. e.g., Amazon Fire tablets. As I mentioned, Amazon Fire tablets. Maybe also smart watches.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross-platform testing, allowing me to test web apps on various devices and OS versions, enhancing my testing coverage for UI and cross-browser/platform scenarios.
Essential for Efficient Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I love using BrowserStack for manual QA testing across multiple client web projects. It lets me validate functionality, responsive design, and visual consistency across various real browsers, operating systems, and mobile devices without needing a physical device lab. This is especially helpful for comparing Figma designs against production builds and documenting cross-browser bugs for client reports. BrowserStack solves several critical pain points in my QA workflow, including eliminating the need for a physical device lab, catching bugs exclusive to certain environments, speeding up bug reproduction and verification, improving bug report quality, and enabling thorough responsive testing. What I like most is the combination of real device access and speed, allowing me to instantly launch devices like iPhone, Samsung, or MacBook without setup. Additionally, I really appreciate BrowserStack’s seamless session start-up, local testing support, native devtools integration, and the clean, intuitive interface. Each of these features directly solves a real problem in my daily QA work and together they transform how efficiently and professionally I can deliver results to clients. The initial setup was remarkably easy, one of the smoothest onboarding experiences I’ve had with any professional QA tool.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is an excellent platform overall, there are a few areas where I think the experience could be even better: Session time limits can feel restrictive; Copy-paste between local machine and remote device; File upload testing on mobile devices; screenshot annotation tools; mobile device availability during peak hours.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for manual QA testing, eliminating the need for a physical device lab, catching environment-specific bugs, improving bug reports, speeding up bug verification, and enabling thorough responsive testing.
Effortless Test Management with AI-Powered BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
I really like BrowserStack for TestCase management and its built-in AI feature that helps automatically create steps for test cases, minimizing efforts. I also appreciate how easy the initial setup was and the integration with Jira. These aspects make test runs and summary reports much more manageable for me.
What do you dislike about the product?
More features for API testing need to be implemented
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for TestCase management, solving problems with test runs and summary reports. The built-in AI helps us automatically create test case steps, minimizing our efforts.
showing 11 - 20