BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,225 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Setup, Comprehensive Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack for its easy coverage and wide device setup. The wide device coverage ensures we can test across real world environments, which is really beneficial. The easy setup not only saves us time but also reduces costs. Initially setting it up was very easy, with minimal effort required.
What do you dislike about the product?
The performance can be slow at times, and session stability sometimes can be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for testing, solving the challenge of testing reliably across multiple browsers and devices. It offers wide device coverage for real-world environments, and the easy setup saves time and money.
BrowserStack: Essential, Reliable Cross-Browser Testing With Massive Real-Device Coverage
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack has become an essential part of our testing workflow. The thing I appreciate most is the massive device and browser coverage — being able to test on real devices across hundreds of browser and OS combinations without maintaining any physical device lab is a huge time-saver.
The Live Testing feature is incredibly intuitive; I can spin up a real browser session in seconds and debug issues on the spot. The Automate feature integrates seamlessly with our CI/CD pipeline, which means we catch cross-browser issues early before they reach production.
I also really value the speed and reliability of the sessions — minimal lag even when testing on remote devices. The Accessibility Testing and Percy visual testing add-ons are great bonuses that go beyond just cross-browser checks.
Overall, BrowserStack removes the infrastructure headache entirely and lets the team focus on what matters — shipping quality software.
The Live Testing feature is incredibly intuitive; I can spin up a real browser session in seconds and debug issues on the spot. The Automate feature integrates seamlessly with our CI/CD pipeline, which means we catch cross-browser issues early before they reach production.
I also really value the speed and reliability of the sessions — minimal lag even when testing on remote devices. The Accessibility Testing and Percy visual testing add-ons are great bonuses that go beyond just cross-browser checks.
Overall, BrowserStack removes the infrastructure headache entirely and lets the team focus on what matters — shipping quality software.
What do you dislike about the product?
While BrowserStack is a fantastic tool overall, there are a few pain points worth mentioning.
The pricing is probably the biggest concern — it can get quite expensive, especially for larger teams or when you need multiple parallel sessions. For small startups or individual developers, the cost can feel steep compared to the value received at lower tiers.
Occasionally, session stability can be an issue — I've experienced random disconnections or slow load times during live testing sessions, which can be frustrating when you're in the middle of debugging a tricky issue.
The queue times during peak hours for certain devices can also be a bottleneck, particularly for older or more niche device/OS combinations that are in high demand.
Lastly, while the dashboard has improved over time, the onboarding experience for new team members could be smoother — there's a slight learning curve when setting up Automate with complex CI/CD configurations.
These are relatively minor gripes given the overall quality of the platform, but they are areas where BrowserStack could improve to deliver an even better experience.
The pricing is probably the biggest concern — it can get quite expensive, especially for larger teams or when you need multiple parallel sessions. For small startups or individual developers, the cost can feel steep compared to the value received at lower tiers.
Occasionally, session stability can be an issue — I've experienced random disconnections or slow load times during live testing sessions, which can be frustrating when you're in the middle of debugging a tricky issue.
The queue times during peak hours for certain devices can also be a bottleneck, particularly for older or more niche device/OS combinations that are in high demand.
Lastly, while the dashboard has improved over time, the onboarding experience for new team members could be smoother — there's a slight learning curve when setting up Automate with complex CI/CD configurations.
These are relatively minor gripes given the overall quality of the platform, but they are areas where BrowserStack could improve to deliver an even better experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Before BrowserStack, cross-browser and cross-device testing was a major challenge. Maintaining an in-house device lab was costly, time-consuming, and never truly comprehensive — we could never cover every browser, OS, and device combination our users might be using in the real world.
BrowserStack solves this problem entirely by providing instant access to a cloud-based infrastructure of real devices and browsers. This means we no longer need to invest in physical hardware or worry about keeping devices updated with the latest OS versions.
The biggest benefit has been the reduction in production bugs. By catching cross-browser compatibility issues early in the development cycle — before code reaches production — we've significantly reduced the number of bug reports coming in from end users on specific devices or browsers.
It has also greatly improved team collaboration. Developers, QAs, and even product managers can jump into a live session and visually verify how a feature looks and behaves across different environments, making feedback loops much faster.
From a time perspective, what used to take days of manual device testing can now be done in hours with automated test runs, freeing up the team to focus on building new features rather than firefighting compatibility issues.
In short, BrowserStack has made our QA process faster, more reliable, and far more scalable — directly contributing to a better product experience for our users.
BrowserStack solves this problem entirely by providing instant access to a cloud-based infrastructure of real devices and browsers. This means we no longer need to invest in physical hardware or worry about keeping devices updated with the latest OS versions.
The biggest benefit has been the reduction in production bugs. By catching cross-browser compatibility issues early in the development cycle — before code reaches production — we've significantly reduced the number of bug reports coming in from end users on specific devices or browsers.
It has also greatly improved team collaboration. Developers, QAs, and even product managers can jump into a live session and visually verify how a feature looks and behaves across different environments, making feedback loops much faster.
From a time perspective, what used to take days of manual device testing can now be done in hours with automated test runs, freeing up the team to focus on building new features rather than firefighting compatibility issues.
In short, BrowserStack has made our QA process faster, more reliable, and far more scalable — directly contributing to a better product experience for our users.
Innovative Ideas That makes Quality Smarter
What do you like best about the product?
The innovations, and the thought process behind improving quality, are commendable. It consistently brings up ideas that reflect real-world problems encountered throughout the software development lifecycle.
What do you dislike about the product?
The high pricing model and performance issues is something that makes it difficult for mid-level companies.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browserstack is serving as a bridge in enhancing the skillset of QE engineers along with agents help bringing the development closer to testing. Also, the integration with multiple tools makes it a 1-stop for entire lifecycle. It optimises the entire process.
Cost-Effective Device Testing Solution
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for testing applications and games on different devices. I like the readiness, availability, and ease of access to different devices. It saves a lot of costs that I would have spent on procuring real devices. Plus, all team members can use the same devices, unlike with real devices, where we would have only one. The initial setup of BrowserStack was very easy and user-friendly.
What do you dislike about the product?
For a small-scale organization like us, sometimes the cost becomes an issue.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack eliminates the hassle of procuring real devices, saving costs significantly. It provides readiness, availability, and ease of access to various devices, allowing multiple team members to test on the same devices. It's user-friendly and affordable.
Revolutionized Our Cross-Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack for its wide browser coverage, which allows testing across multiple browsers and OS combinations. This feature helps avoid environment-related issues and aids in faster regression execution. The initial setup was awesome; it was easy and perfect, making it valuable for testing UI and functionality across multiple mobile devices.
What do you dislike about the product?
You should give your other services as free trial for at least 1 month to explore more opportunities.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser and cross-device testing. It allows testing UI and functionality across multiple mobile devices and browser combinations, avoiding environment-related issues and speeding up regression execution.
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser Testing Fast and Infrastructure-Free
What do you like best about the product?
Cross browser testing
Real device cloud
Selenium and cypress integration
Real device cloud
Selenium and cypress integration
What do you dislike about the product?
Flaky test session
slow device loading
local testing setup complexity
slow device loading
local testing setup complexity
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Device fragmentation
slow release cycle
regression catching
slow release cycle
regression catching
Broad Device & OS Coverage Makes QA Easy
What do you like best about the product?
The breadth of devices and operating systems to test with is SO useful for proper QA, especially with dealing with a user community full of legacy devices
What do you dislike about the product?
The licensing model tends to focus more on larger testing groups, and generally trying to charge for more than smaller groups need.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps us support our members with a variety of devices and operating systems. Many of them suffer from health conditions that limit their ability to fully engage in support calls, so having a platform to test our system against their devices aids us in giving them the best experience possible.
Impressive Range of Browsers and Devices for Website Testing
What do you like best about the product?
It offers an impressive range of browsers and devices for testing websites.
What do you dislike about the product?
It is a bit costly for a small business, but I believe they offer a freelancer plan.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
When an issue arises on a certain web browser, BrowserStack is the easiest way to quickly check and diagnose it.
Fast, Reliable Testing with Instant Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like BrowserStack for its wide range of real devices and browsers available instantly. Its fast, reliable testing and easy interface make debugging and testing much quicker. The live testing feature lets me interact with real devices to quickly find issues, and the screenshot feature helps me compare layouts across browsers and spot visual bugs easily. I also appreciate that the initial setup consists of very easy steps.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes BrowserStack can be slow or laggy on certain devices or connections. I’d like BrowserStack to have faster device loading and more stable connections during live testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test websites and apps, solving compatibility issues across browsers and devices. It saves time by eliminating the need for multiple environments, and its fast, reliable testing with a wide range of real devices makes debugging much quicker.
Easy Setup with Broad Real‑Device Coverage for Reliable Testing
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about BrowserStack is its ease of use and wide coverage of real devices and browsers. The platform provides a smooth testing experience without complex setup, making it easy to get started quickly. Features like low‑code automation, clear UI, and strong integration capabilities help streamline testing workflows and improve overall efficiency.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area for improvement is that some advanced features, especially AI‑driven capabilities, require an upgrade or demo, which makes it harder to fully evaluate them during exploration. Additionally, clearer guidance or in‑product documentation for first‑time users would help reduce the initial learning curve and make feature discovery easier.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack helps solve the challenge of testing across a wide range of real browsers and devices without the need to maintain complex in‑house infrastructure. It simplifies cross‑browser and device testing, reduces setup time, and improves confidence in release quality. By providing an easy‑to‑use platform with reliable environments, it helps teams identify issues earlier, speed up testing cycles, and improve overall productivity.
showing 11 - 20