BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,227 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Mobile Testing Without Physical Devices
What do you like best about the product?
I like that I don't need to have a physical device to test, which reduces friction when it comes to testing. The initial setup of BrowserStack was pretty easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
live sessions feel laggy
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack reduces friction in testing and eliminates the need for physical devices.
Effortless Cross-Country Compatibility
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack incredibly useful for checking websites that are only visible to certain countries. The option to change the country within BrowserStack is something I really like, as it allows me to bypass location restrictions and view websites as needed. It's also very easy to access websites using BrowserStack. I appreciate the different types of browsers available, which makes it versatile. The initial setup was very easy, which added to the overall positive experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to easily view websites restricted to specific countries by changing the browsing location.
Comprehensive Device Testing Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I like using BrowserStack to test my websites and iOS apps because it helps me identify what needs to be fixed. I appreciate the variety of simulators available, which offers a wide range of testing options. Debugging with detailed error analytics is helpful, and I value the instant access to a vast array of mobile devices without needing physical hardware. These features bridge the gap between initial code development and the unpredictable reality of how an app performs in a user's hands. The initial setup of BrowserStack was very easy and straightforward.
What do you dislike about the product?
Their UI needs to be improved because sometimes I can't find things easily.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test websites and iOS apps, identifying needed fixes. It bridges the gap between code and real-world performance with simulators, error analytics, and device access, all without physical hardware.
Excellent Coverage of Device and Browser Combinations
What do you like best about the product?
Access to lots of device and browser coombinations
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it’s hard to press the buttons on mobile.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It gives us access to devices we simply don’t have on hand for testing. Safari testing is essential, so being able to use iPhones and iPads is crucial when carrying out QA.
BrowserStack Makes Real Cross-Browser Testing Easy with Seamless CI/CD Integrations
What do you like best about the product?
Cross-browser and cross-device testing is a major strength: it gives access to a huge range of real browsers, operating systems, and devices without needing to maintain your own device lab, and that’s probably its biggest draw.
The real device cloud is another standout. Unlike emulators or simulators, BrowserStack offers testing on real devices, which leads to more accurate results and a better sense of how apps behave in the wild.
Its integration ecosystem is also solid. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Jenkins, and others, so it’s easy to plug into existing workflows.
On top of that, it supports both live and automated testing. You can do interactive manual testing (Live) as well as automated test execution (Automate), which helps cover different testing needs.
Finally, the cloud-based setup adds a lot of accessibility and convenience, since teams can test from anywhere without the infrastructure overhead.
The real device cloud is another standout. Unlike emulators or simulators, BrowserStack offers testing on real devices, which leads to more accurate results and a better sense of how apps behave in the wild.
Its integration ecosystem is also solid. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and popular tools like Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Jenkins, and others, so it’s easy to plug into existing workflows.
On top of that, it supports both live and automated testing. You can do interactive manual testing (Live) as well as automated test execution (Automate), which helps cover different testing needs.
Finally, the cloud-based setup adds a lot of accessibility and convenience, since teams can test from anywhere without the infrastructure overhead.
What do you dislike about the product?
Performance and latency: Live testing sessions can feel sluggish, especially when you’re working with remote devices. There’s often noticeable lag during interactions, which can slow down manual testing workflows.
Pricing: It’s one of the more expensive options in the space. The tiered pricing model can add up quickly, particularly for smaller teams or startups that need access to multiple products (Live, Automate, App Live, etc.).
Session stability: Some users report sessions dropping or timing out unexpectedly, which is especially frustrating during longer testing runs.
Limited device customization: Because you’re using shared cloud devices, there can be restrictions on what you can install or configure. As a result, it may not fully replicate a real user’s environment.
Queue times: During peak usage, there can be wait times to access popular device/browser combinations, which can slow down CI pipelines.
Learning curve for advanced features: While basic usage is straightforward, getting the most out of features like Percy (visual testing) or test observability tools can take some ramp-up time.
Debugging limitations: Troubleshooting failures on remote devices can sometimes be harder than working locally, even with the tools BrowserStack provides.
Pricing: It’s one of the more expensive options in the space. The tiered pricing model can add up quickly, particularly for smaller teams or startups that need access to multiple products (Live, Automate, App Live, etc.).
Session stability: Some users report sessions dropping or timing out unexpectedly, which is especially frustrating during longer testing runs.
Limited device customization: Because you’re using shared cloud devices, there can be restrictions on what you can install or configure. As a result, it may not fully replicate a real user’s environment.
Queue times: During peak usage, there can be wait times to access popular device/browser combinations, which can slow down CI pipelines.
Learning curve for advanced features: While basic usage is straightforward, getting the most out of features like Percy (visual testing) or test observability tools can take some ramp-up time.
Debugging limitations: Troubleshooting failures on remote devices can sometimes be harder than working locally, even with the tools BrowserStack provides.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Device and browser fragmentation is a real challenge—the web and mobile ecosystem is incredibly fragmented, with thousands of combinations of browsers, browser versions, operating systems, and devices. Maintaining a physical lab to cover even a fraction of these combinations is expensive and impractical. BrowserStack addresses this by providing on-demand cloud access to a wide range of real devices and browsers.
Testing infrastructure overhead is another major pain point. Setting up and maintaining Selenium grids, device farms, and test environments can take significant engineering time and ongoing effort. BrowserStack abstracts much of that work away, so teams can focus on writing, running, and improving tests instead of managing infrastructure.
Slow release cycles are often the result of unreliable cross-browser and cross-device coverage. Without dependable testing, teams either ship with uncertainty or slow down releases to test manually. BrowserStack helps teams release faster and with more confidence by making comprehensive testing easier to integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
Geographic and team distribution also matters. When teams are distributed, everyone still needs access to the same testing environments, and a cloud platform makes that possible without shipping hardware around.
In practice, this translates into faster time to market, fewer bugs reaching production, reduced infrastructure costs compared to maintaining a device lab, and greater confidence that the product works across the environments users actually rely on.
Testing infrastructure overhead is another major pain point. Setting up and maintaining Selenium grids, device farms, and test environments can take significant engineering time and ongoing effort. BrowserStack abstracts much of that work away, so teams can focus on writing, running, and improving tests instead of managing infrastructure.
Slow release cycles are often the result of unreliable cross-browser and cross-device coverage. Without dependable testing, teams either ship with uncertainty or slow down releases to test manually. BrowserStack helps teams release faster and with more confidence by making comprehensive testing easier to integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
Geographic and team distribution also matters. When teams are distributed, everyone still needs access to the same testing environments, and a cloud platform makes that possible without shipping hardware around.
In practice, this translates into faster time to market, fewer bugs reaching production, reduced infrastructure costs compared to maintaining a device lab, and greater confidence that the product works across the environments users actually rely on.
Great for Cross-Browser & Mobile Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Great for cross-browser & mobile testing
What do you dislike about the product?
None of what I can think of, so far I like
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Catching early UI issues for our projects
Essential for Comprehensive Browser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for frontend testing and appreciate that it lets me test across different browsers and devices without needing to set them up locally, which helps me quickly catch compatibility issues. I like how easy it is to test across many devices and browser versions without much effort, making debugging ten times easier. I would say the initial setup was pretty straightforward and easy, and there's a lot of information available online about working with BrowserStack, making it much easier to set up and use. It's my go-to platform for different browser and mobile testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing that didn't work well for me is the country selection during local testing and would like to see a solution for that.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows me to test my frontend across different browsers and devices without setting them up locally, helping me quickly catch compatibility issues.
App automate Makes Release Runs Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
App automate, with this feature you cam't focus on quality
What do you dislike about the product?
Random glitches during release runs. It really annoying
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Added custom iOS certificate to resolve websockets issue
Low-Code BrowserStack Test Management Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
Test Management
Low-code browserstack and
Low-code browserstack and
What do you dislike about the product?
mobile automation not supporting and also some support
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Test Stability and Debugging: Offers video recordings, screenshots, logs, and AI-powered fixes for flaky scripts, reducing manual debugging time
BrowserStack Makes Cross-Browser & Device Testing Effortless
What do you like best about the product?
What i like best about browserstack is how easy it makes cross browser and cross device testing without needing to maintain any local setup. Best customer support from browserstack that will very helpful for me.And it’s something I rely on regularly for quick cross-browser and device testing. It’s convenient, easy to access, and fits smoothly into my daily testing workflow.And it’s quick to set up and doesn’t require complex configuration.And it connects smoothly with existing tools and frameworks, making it easy to include in the testing workflow without much effort.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside is that it can sometime feel a bit slow or laggy especialy when running test on real devices or during peak usage times
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack basically solves the headache of managing different browsers and devices for testing. It saves my time a lot, because I can quickly test everything in one place without setting up anything manually
showing 121 - 130