BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,243 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Cloud execution
What do you like best about the product?
It provides the cross browser support for manual and automated execution. Helps us in getting the automated scripts executed on parallel instances.
What do you dislike about the product?
The visual comparison product is not accurate, there is still some variations in screen comparison, they need to improve on how they can get their comparison with figma.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps us in running the scripts from github actions and monitoring the execution with the help of real time logs and video.
Simplifies cross-platform testing with excellent browser coverage.
What do you like best about the product?
As a QA Engineer, I can quickly test across multiple browser and devices without complex setup and it has user friendly interface and helps me thoroughly in test coverage. and it is easy to use anyone without prior experience and use the browser stack and use its features. due to lack of physical device we are using browser stack regularly for our testing purpose.
What do you dislike about the product?
Many a times while using cross browser feature of app live the device/browser becomes unresponsive and lags due to this need to restart the session again.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It save us lot of times for testing as it let us do testing on various mobile device and different browsers with different version. many a times some bugs occur in specific device so with the help of browser stack we are verifying it with that device across different browser which help us to identify the issue reoccurrence rate.
Platform with a stack of browsers and devices
What do you like best about the product?
It can be used for automation and real devices testing
What do you dislike about the product?
Devices unavailability at times. Accessibility testing should be made free for use
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps me test with ease instead of testing on real devices
Great for our website testing and debugging cross browser and device
What do you like best about the product?
it has been fantastic to use it as a testing and debugging device, we have been getting feedback from customer service team on certain bugs on the website that we cannot reproduce, this is when browser stack come in handy. awesome to be able to choose exact device and browser to our needs. we use it on a weekly basis and it has been really easy to cooperate it into our workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
i dont think it offers different device simulation in different geolocation yet. that will be more helpful to us if in this platform as well
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
to be able to reproduce bug in specific device detected but we do not have access to. this is benefitting us so that we can debug where we can reproduce the bug
Good product for multi browser testing
What do you like best about the product?
I use browserstack for multi screen testing, so actually it really helped me to check multiple screens and multiple screen sizes testing. It actually helped me a lot. So if I want to test my screens of my web application in any process this gave me and flexibility to scale my UI testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think it would be great if there is also offline support in the system for multi screens that would be great.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Multi screen ui testing
Great way to test accessibility on different platforms
What do you like best about the product?
I use a Macbook Pro but I need to test websites and apps for accessibility compliance using NVDA on Windows. BrowserStack allows me to do that. I can test NVDA (screenreader on Chrome and Firefox for Windows as well as Android's screen reader. I use my own MacBook Pro for Voiceover testing and my own iPhone for Voiceover testing on iOS, so I can't speak to how BrowserStack works for those platforms. (I think Voiceover testing is not available for one or both of them though.)
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm often moving back and forth between BrowserStack and other browser tabs and BrowserStack often times out while I'm away. I understand why, but it's a bit annoying sometimes. It would be better if the platform also had Voiceover testing for both Mac and iOS as well. Most developers at my company are working on Windows, so it would help them if they could see how VoiceOver performs as well.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I don't have to physically have multiple devices to test the most common browser and platform combinations. I was even able to modify a few keys on my external Mac keyboard to simulate the Windows keyboard Insert key, which is crucial for some NVDA functions.
Very helpful for the testers
What do you like best about the product?
Cross-browser testing approach.
Devices availbility.
Customer support
Devices availbility.
Customer support
What do you dislike about the product?
desktop app is not fully functional.
Integration and bug reporting
Integration and bug reporting
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing various browsers, various OS and geo-locations helps most.
Saves Time & Effort – No need to maintain a local testing setup; testing can be done instantly on cloud-based browsers and devices.
Increases Test Coverage – Ensures applications work across a broader range of devices and browsers, reducing the risk of compatibility issues.
Enhances User Experience – By catching and fixing issues before release, it leads to a smoother experience for end users.
Improves Team Efficiency – Developers and testers can focus on building and shipping high-quality software without infrastructure worries.
Cost-Effective – Avoids the need to purchase and manage physical devices for testing.
Saves Time & Effort – No need to maintain a local testing setup; testing can be done instantly on cloud-based browsers and devices.
Increases Test Coverage – Ensures applications work across a broader range of devices and browsers, reducing the risk of compatibility issues.
Enhances User Experience – By catching and fixing issues before release, it leads to a smoother experience for end users.
Improves Team Efficiency – Developers and testers can focus on building and shipping high-quality software without infrastructure worries.
Cost-Effective – Avoids the need to purchase and manage physical devices for testing.
We love BrowserStack
What do you like best about the product?
A lot of devices, UI, local testing, AQA integrations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Maybe the price, but not for me. Coz pay my bosses)
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Devices
Good experience with Browser Stack
What do you like best about the product?
The availability of features which are mostly used in daily task as QA.
What do you dislike about the product?
I do not have any dislike points for the application.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I help me to test the applications on various browsers simultaneously.
Great cross browser testing tool
What do you like best about the product?
one of best things about browser stack is its real device capability. It allows testing on real device also ensure accurate results of testing. Browser stack is easy to integrate with automation frameworks like selenium.
What do you dislike about the product?
Browser stack is very powerful tool but price is very high. sometimes. test on real mobile devices experience slight lag.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Browser stack makes testing websites and apps much easier by letting me check how they work on different browser and real devices without needing to buy them. It saves times by allowing automated testing with tools like selenium and cypress. Since it integrates with CI/CD pipelines, i can catch issues early and fix them before deployment.
showing 1,091 - 1,100