BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,243 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Seamless interaction with apps in real-time across multiple devices and operating systems
What do you like best about the product?
Thousands of devices to choose from that allows testing of websites and apps in real-time across multiple environments and comprehensive OS/Browser Coverage across all versions of iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS
What do you dislike about the product?
Experience disconnections during extended testing sessions
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Solving our testing pain points with wide variety of mobile devices
Great device farm in the cloud
What do you like best about the product?
Live provides an easy to access range of browser/operating system combination.
With App Live we have an easy to acces device farm to test our apps. It also provides an easy access network requests sent by our apps. No need anymore to struggle with setting up proxies. Due to the integration with Firebase the latest builds of our apps are always available in App Live. No hassle anymore with downloading and uploading ipa and apk files.
Percy also has been a game changer for us. It provides quick feedback on styling issues that are hard to catch when testing manually.
With App Live we have an easy to acces device farm to test our apps. It also provides an easy access network requests sent by our apps. No need anymore to struggle with setting up proxies. Due to the integration with Firebase the latest builds of our apps are always available in App Live. No hassle anymore with downloading and uploading ipa and apk files.
Percy also has been a game changer for us. It provides quick feedback on styling issues that are hard to catch when testing manually.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much. Performance can be slow from time to time put it has improved a lot in the past years.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Easy access to mobile devices. We need to manage less real devices.
Great on-demand stable of iOS devices
What do you like best about the product?
BrowserStack provides me with the tools I need to complete an in-depth evaluation of our online products on a variety of Apple devices. I can run quick checks of functionality and reproduce issues reported be end users, using both current and previous versions of iPadOS. BrowserStack gives us access to real devices (not just emulators/simulators), so we can be confident in our test experience and results. And since we don't have to procure, provision, maintain, and update the devices ourselves, we can test on a wider variety of devices and operating system versions. I can start a test session in just a couple of clicks, and switch to a different device just as quickly. The availability of Chrome DevTools/Safari Web Inspector in the BrowserStack tool further reduces our dependence on having local hardware to support testing and troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
The one weakness of BrowserStack in our testing is the limited selection of tablet-sized Android devices. There are several Galaxy Tab devices, but only the A9+ is running Android 14, and none currently have Android 15. Of course, we have seen for ourselves that maintaining an up-to-date selection of Android tablets is challenging.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The big benefit of BrowserStack is that we can test on more iPad models without having to purchase and maintain so many devices ourselves.
Legitimate review of BS
What do you like best about the product?
BS is the cloud-based platform to help developers and testers with various verticals like browsers and mobile application, its help to manage application without holding any local infrastructure, that way give spaces to storage and manpower, latency is high, maintenance is peak, resiliency also top. its real cross browser platform for testing desktop and mobile application, its well managed and monitored.
What do you dislike about the product?
BS is pulling back to use by its high cost, some complex testing need more workaround, Its user interface identification has glitches.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Its reduces time to segregate web site speed analysis
Can’t Operate Without It
What do you like best about the product?
It’s great to have a tool that allows me to test my website on a variety of different browsers and operating systems.
What do you dislike about the product?
My major dislike is the refresh rate; animations are sometimes very slow.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack solves the issue of making websites and applications accessible across a myriad of different browsers and operating systems.
Good for automation testing, saves time
What do you like best about the product?
Main thing I like is how easily it works with my automation framework. I use Selenium mostly and it was not hard to connect with BrowserStack. You just run the test and it will execute on multiple browsers or devices, no setup required. Also I like the dashboard which shows session details and logs, helps in debugging.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes execution feels bit slow specially on mobile. Also if internet is not stable, it disconnects. And one more thing is price, for more minutes or parallel runs you need to pay more.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I don’t have to maintain local setup for testing now. It’s easy to run automation on multiple browsers in cloud. This saves time and effort. We also use it in CI pipeline so now we get quick feedback after every deployment.
the best tool to automate mobile dev
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about BrowserStack is the ability to test on real devices. It gives me a more authentic feel for how things will actually perform on users' phones and desktops. Plus, the fact that you can run tests across different browsers quickly is super helpful for spotting issues early.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I don't love is the cost. It can get pretty pricey, especially if you're a smaller team or a freelancer. And sometimes, the performance feels a little slow, especially on mobile testing. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it can be annoying when you're trying to move fast.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Building apps on multiple device types including iOS and Android and automating tests.
Browserstack was excellent for our QA team
What do you like best about the product?
Cloud testing is so much easy, we used to have physical phone to test so many scenarios but with Browserstack it is piece of cake.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing so far, i have observed which i would say i disliked about Browserstack
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Maintaining the physical environment for testing
Save Your Time with Crossbrowser Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Supports a vast range of browsers and operating systems.
Provides access to real devices for testing across different browsers, OS, and combinations.
Access from anywhere makes it highly convenient for remote teams.
Integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools.
Enables parallel testing, which speeds up the test execution process significantly.
Offers tools like developer logs, network logs, and screenshots for debugging issues.
Live and Automated Testing Options.
Allows testing of locally hosted or firewalled websites using a secure BrowserStack tunnel.
Provides access to real devices for testing across different browsers, OS, and combinations.
Access from anywhere makes it highly convenient for remote teams.
Integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools.
Enables parallel testing, which speeds up the test execution process significantly.
Offers tools like developer logs, network logs, and screenshots for debugging issues.
Live and Automated Testing Options.
Allows testing of locally hosted or firewalled websites using a secure BrowserStack tunnel.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some slowness and latency for Live Testing, particularly for heavy applications.
BrowserStack is relatively expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers, and lower-tier plans often limit the number of parallel sessions.
Debugging locally hosted or firewalled websites can be slower than testing on a local device.
BrowserStack requires an active internet connection since it’s entirely cloud-based, which can be a disadvantage in environments with unreliable connectivity.
Slow responses or insufficient solutions from customer support for technical issues, especially on lower-tier plans.
BrowserStack is relatively expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers, and lower-tier plans often limit the number of parallel sessions.
Debugging locally hosted or firewalled websites can be slower than testing on a local device.
BrowserStack requires an active internet connection since it’s entirely cloud-based, which can be a disadvantage in environments with unreliable connectivity.
Slow responses or insufficient solutions from customer support for technical issues, especially on lower-tier plans.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack allows to ensure that applications work flawlessly across different platforms and devices, leading to better user satisfaction. Eliminates the need for physical infrastructure, saving significant costs. Speeds up regression testing cycles.
WCAG Testing
What do you like best about the product?
Browserstack has a feature for WCAG Accessibility testing on mobile apps and the web as well. Here we can also automate our testing and reporting for any number execution.
Along with that we get a visual scanner with the Accessibility testing to test our app and web UI.
After the execution of the test we get a detailed report where we can also see the impacts of the issues discovered in the Accessibility testing.
Along with that we get a visual scanner with the Accessibility testing to test our app and web UI.
After the execution of the test we get a detailed report where we can also see the impacts of the issues discovered in the Accessibility testing.
What do you dislike about the product?
When you test for only accessibility testing it will take 1-2 min for a whole page of a website but when you turn on the visual scanner it is taking a lot of time for execution.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have scheduled accessibility testing to run on every day at specific time on the day. For implementing this accessibility testing for our website we don't need to build any framework or create pipeline, everything we are doing related to accessibility testing is in its platform only.
showing 1,061 - 1,070