BrowserStack
BrowserStackExternal reviews
3,231 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Essential for Cross-Device QA Testing
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack easy to use, especially since it runs on real devices and even shows the hardware info. I appreciate the ease of switching to any OS or browser, and the initial setup was straightforward with just setting up an account and going. It's also incredibly valuable for testing multiple devices to ensure websites meet QA needs. It's particularly handy for testing specific issues that users report, like with an iPhone 16 on Safari, without needing to have the actual device. Running in Citrix is a great experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes network connection is buggy over VPN, especially if QA is offshore
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for website testing across multiple devices to ensure quality. It's easy to use, runs on real devices, shows hardware info, and allows easy OS/browser switching. It lets me test specific issues reported by users, like on an iPhone 16, without the actual device.
Great UI and Easy to Use, but Performance Can Be Slow
What do you like best about the product?
it is a really nice software to use and has good ui
What do you dislike about the product?
sometimes the performance is really slow but it's good
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
the pricing is good and their support is very nice
Effortless Cross-Browser UX Flow Comparisons That Save Time and Money
What do you like best about the product?
I love that we can compare our UX flows across different browsers, platforms, and devices to analyze and suggest improvements, as well as fix flaws in the overall UX flow. It also reduces the time we spend on manual testing, saving us both time and money.
What do you dislike about the product?
My experience has been wonderful, and I honestly have nothing negative to say. If any compatibility issues come up, BrowserStarck assures us they’ll be handled properly, rather than turning into serious problems for the customer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We need to use real devices to test our product from start to finish. We use real BrowserStack devices to simulate end-to-end testing, making sure the entire typical workflow is covered.
Real Device App Testing with a Wide Variety of Models
What do you like best about the product?
Real device app testing. They have a wide variety of device choices and models.
What do you dislike about the product?
Low time limit in trial accounts. Some latest devices unavailable
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Allowing me to test my apps on real world devices and take screenshots and record app behaviour. This is beneficial to mimic real usage on variety of devices and models.
Effortless Testing, High Efficiency
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for web development and testing, and it's definitely worth learning and using. It helps me test my application across multiple browsers and real devices without maintaining physical setups. I like its ease of use and access to real devices, which saves time and makes testing faster and more efficient. It also works well with automation tools and helps in continuous testing, which improves productivity. The setup was easy and quick, with minimal configuration required.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pricing could be more affordable, and sometimes there is a slight lag during testing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to test my application across multiple browsers and real devices without maintaining physical setups. It's easy to use, provides access to real devices, and integrates well with automation tools for efficient continuous testing.
Essential Tool for Testing, High Cost and Setup Complexity
What do you like best about the product?
I find BrowserStack to be a great tool for browser compatibility. It's really convenient because I don't need a particular device room with multiple resolutions and multiple OS devices. What stands out for me is its ease of use and compatibility, which saves a lot of time and is cost-effective. It's valuable for our team as we don't need to switch to multiple things, which has saved us a lot of time.
What do you dislike about the product?
On the cost side it is on the higher side. Also the first time setup is a bit complex.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack is great for testing browser compatibility without needing a device room, saving time and being cost-effective for our team.
Makes cross-browser testing way less painful.
What do you like best about the product?
Honestly, the biggest win is not having to manage any physical devices or browser setups. I can just log in and start testing on real devices and different browsers immediately.
In my day-to-day work, I often need to quickly verify features across multiple environments, and Browserstack makes that easy. Running tests in parallel saves a lot of time, and the Selenium integration fits nicely into our existing CI pipeline. Debugging is also easier with session recording and logs- especially when somethings breaks and you need to quickly figure out why.
It’s one of those tools that just removes a lot of friction from the workflow.
In my day-to-day work, I often need to quickly verify features across multiple environments, and Browserstack makes that easy. Running tests in parallel saves a lot of time, and the Selenium integration fits nicely into our existing CI pipeline. Debugging is also easier with session recording and logs- especially when somethings breaks and you need to quickly figure out why.
It’s one of those tools that just removes a lot of friction from the workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes sessions can be a bit slow or laggy, especially during busy times. I have also seen session drop occasionally, which can be annoying if you are in the middle of testing.
Pricing can be a concern too. It’s worth it if you use it properly, but for smaller teams it might feel a bit expensive.
Pricing can be a concern too. It’s worth it if you use it properly, but for smaller teams it might feel a bit expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It basically removes the headache of setting up and maintaining a device lab. We can test faster, catch issues earlier, and release with more confidence.
Overall, it saves time and makes testing much more efficient.
Overall, it saves time and makes testing much more efficient.
Convenient Testing Across Devices and Browsers
What do you like best about the product?
I enjoy using BrowserStack because of the ease of use and the availability of devices and browsers, which is so convenient. It saves me time as I can instantly switch between devices and browsers, making testing easier since it's all in one place. The initial setup was easy, and I used it with VS Code to test and debug my projects.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it's slow/laggy, but it's good as it is.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
BrowserStack lets me test my website on various browsers and devices without owning them, saving time as I switch instantly between them, making testing easier since it's all in one place.
Essential for Cross-Browser Testing, Needs Performance Tweaks
What do you like best about the product?
I use BrowserStack for cross-browser and real-device testing, which is great for validating UI consistency and ensuring compatibility across various browsers and devices. I like the real-device testing capability and how quickly I can spin up different browser/device combinations. This is especially useful for reproducing edge-case bugs and validating UI behavior that is hard to simulate locally. I appreciate how BrowserStack eliminates the need for maintaining an internal device lab and simplifies cross-browser testing. It allows me to debug issues specific to certain browser versions or devices, validate responsive behavior, and run regression checks in hard-to-replicate environments. I also enjoy how BrowserStack integrates well into existing QA workflows. Features like session recording, developer tools access, and the ability to quickly debug issues in specific environments are especially useful during regression testing. These features bring production-like environments closer to my development workflow, reducing the time spent reproducing and diagnosing cross-environment issues.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area where BrowserStack could improve is session performance and stability. At times, sessions can feel laggy, and reconnecting or restarting can interrupt workflow. Debugging can also be slightly slower compared to local environments, so optimizations around latency and faster session initialization would help. Reducing session startup time and making device/browser initialization more consistent would help avoid interruptions in the testing flow. It would also be useful to have better session recovery—so if a session drops, you can reconnect without losing all context. From a debugging perspective, more detailed logs around session failures or slowdowns (e.g., network latency, device load) would make it easier to understand what’s going wrong. Additionally, optimizing input responsiveness (typing, scrolling, interactions) would make remote sessions feel closer to local testing. Overall, improving reliability, faster reconnections, and better observability into session performance would significantly enhance the developer experience.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack to eliminate the need for an internal device lab and simplify cross-browser testing. It helps us debug environment-specific issues, validate responsive behavior, and run regression checks. The real-device testing and session recording enhance our QA workflows and reduce time spent on reproducing bugs.
Essential for Mobile Testing, with Minor Performance Hiccups
What do you like best about the product?
I like the variety of devices and platforms that BrowserStack offers, which makes mobile testing more efficient. It provides access to a wide range of devices, including various operating systems, which makes it easy for us to test on multiple platforms. The initial setup was perfect, making it straightforward to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes performance issues appear, and the speed of remote devices can be very slow.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use BrowserStack for mobile testing, accessing a farm of devices. It supports a variety of platforms, making multi-OS testing easy.
showing 1 - 10