We use it to scan the bank's applications systematically. This process aims to identify and address security vulnerabilities within the applications, ensuring the robustness of our security measures.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Great Product
Review form micro focus fortify app
There is no major drawback about this tool.
App Sec Specialist
Best
Safe and Secured Barrier
Additionally, clean-up rules are enforced by this instrument. With the most advanced security research supporting it, this offers the most comprehensive runtime monitoring and protection, as well as the most advanced static and dynamic application security testing solutions.
With the use of this tool, we can promptly detect and address security risks that safeguard data. It guarantees our clients' trust.
A highly trusted and comprehensive application security testing solution, known for its seamless integration, advanced technical capabilities, and reliability
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It stands out by generating fewer false positives which has a distinct advantage, as it translates to reduced remediation efforts, requiring less human resources and cost. The tool provides more accurate feedback to the development team, allowing them to focus their efforts on addressing genuine vulnerabilities efficiently.
What is most valuable?
I appreciate all the features, with a particular emphasis on their vulnerability scanner. For instance, in our environment where two-factor authentication is prevalent across many of our sites, the scanner efficiently identifies vulnerabilities, including those related to second-factor methods or mobile codes. What stands out to me is the user-friendliness of each feature. Given that we're a bank with multiple applications, having the flexibility to customize solutions according to the unique needs of each application is crucial.
What needs improvement?
It would be highly beneficial if Fortify on Demand incorporated runtime analysis, similar to how Contrast Security utilizes agents for proactive application security. This could enhance the solution significantly. Moreover, considering the evolving threat landscape and the inevitability of zero-day vulnerabilities, implementing mechanisms like heuristic approaches would be advantageous. By incorporating heuristic algorithms or leveraging artificial intelligence, especially in the form of behavioral analysis akin to network security practices, Fortify could evolve into a more resilient solution. This could involve heuristic analysis for source code, the introduction of AI-driven processes for enhanced security, and the identification of security hotspots.
For how long have I used the solution?
In this company, I have been using it for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
When it comes to stability, I haven't observed any issues such as crashes or performance issues during the scanning process. I would rate it ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. Our approach involves a centralized team, and we conduct scans across all applications within UBS. Throughout my experience, we've successfully scanned 150 applications.
What about the implementation team?
The ability to install software often depends on individual circumstances. In my case, coming from a security background, the machines provided in our company are typically set up by the network or DevOps team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Despite being on the higher end in terms of cost, the biggest value lies in its abilities, including robust features, seamless integration, and high-quality findings.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We were considering upgrading to the enterprise level, given the need for a robust solution in the banking environment. During this evaluation, we compared Netsparker, Burp Suite, and Fortify. After conducting a proof of concept (POC) that involved testing APIs, websites, and infrastructure arrangements, we presented our analysis to management. Ultimately, Fortify was selected as the preferred choice.
What other advice do I have?
With over 12 years in application security, I've consistently observed the adoption of Fortify in major organizations like Cognizant, Barclays, and Credit Suisse. Across large banks in Europe, Fortify has established a reputation for reliability and effectiveness. Drawing on my experience, I am confident that organizations with clear problem statements and no budget constraints will find Fortify to be a comprehensive solution. Its technical capabilities and features align well with the diverse needs of large organizations in the banking sector. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.