I use the solution for deployments with Java applications in the environment.
Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS
Red HatExternal reviews
291 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Very useful
What do you like best about the product?
How information is displayed, is beneficial the UI
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be great to show a graph with the connections
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
the orchestation of the services
openshift
What do you like best about the product?
Resilient, secure and expandable. User friendly.
What do you dislike about the product?
Complex, sometimes difficult to navigate
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Containerize applications and being able to move workloads to different clusters
Kubernetes is hard
What do you like best about the product?
Value and ease of deploying environments for developers.
What do you dislike about the product?
Its hard. Seems to have a big barrier to entry. Can be costly.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
speed to deployment. app versatility. modernized code deployment. agile applications.
Easy to get started with for both Infrastructure and Developer personas.
What do you like best about the product?
Solid proven platform to deploy an opinionated open-source container platform and create a safe landing zone for cloud-native applications and containers. Good visual dashboard too.
What do you dislike about the product?
Difficult to find pricing for versions and explain the differentation from the open source to customers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Safe landing zone for cloud-native applications and a paved pathway to production for developers to deploy their code. Easy to monitor and extend with Event Driven Ansible.
Enterprise grade Kubernetes
What do you like best about the product?
Simple usage and fast adoption from our teams
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing special I dislike to mention. ..........
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Migrating from a VM world to a container enabled world
Openshift container Review
What do you like best about the product?
Data backup and recovery, Streamline upgrades, and automate time-consuming
What do you dislike about the product?
Should improve on avoiding difficulty using fundamental features like user-management
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I) microservice management
II) we can see the health status on the portal is one click away which helps to troubleshoot upcoming errors faster
II) we can see the health status on the portal is one click away which helps to troubleshoot upcoming errors faster
Has good stability and integrates with multiple applications
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The solution has helped us in faster deployments of the applications.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with multiple applications, including inference tutor and container platforms. It helps us enhance the deployment process and make it faster.
What needs improvement?
The solution encounters lengthier downtime issues for virtual upgrades. In this case, we have to opt for alternative upgrade strategies. This area needs improvement. Also, they should release its serverless version.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution since 2018.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is easy to scale. Our organization plans to increase its usage for the next five years.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's technical support is excellent.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is easy to configure and run.
What was our ROI?
The solution generates a return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is expensive but cost-effective.
What other advice do I have?
The solution is an excellent platform with a fast return on investment. I rate it a ten out of ten.
A stable and scalable solution for microservices and Kubernetes distribution
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution to split monolithic into microservices. I mostly use OpenShift as a Kubernetes distribution.
What is most valuable?
I am impressed with the product's security features.
What needs improvement?
The tool lacks some features to make it compliant with Kubernetes.
For how long have I used the solution?
I am working with the solution for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The cloud version is scalable. The solution's on-prem scalability can be improved.
How are customer service and support?
The tool's support should be improved.
How was the initial setup?
The tool's deployment takes a matter of hours to complete. You need a team of three to four to maintain the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The tool requires knowledgeable people to manage it.
Fast development, improved quality, and easy management
What is our primary use case?
We use it for container management. It's our container management platform for our financial systems.
How has it helped my organization?
It provides flexibility and efficiency. It helps us to design and deliver applications efficiently. We can modify our application in a smaller scope. We don't need to change the whole application.
It makes development fast because we can separate applications into different parts. We can deliver applications in different phases.
It has helped to improve the quality of our end products. It has reduced the project onboarding time by 20% to 25%.
What is most valuable?
I like OCP, and the management UI is better than the open-source ones.
The integration with 3scale is very good. We use that too.
What needs improvement?
The monitoring part could be better to monitor the performance. The automation part could also be better because we had a hard time integrating our application with OCP.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for about two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable for one cluster. When it comes to multiple clusters, it could be better.
We have about 100 users who use this solution.
How are customer service and support?
Their enterprise support is okay, but sometimes, their response is slow. Their response is also not accurate sometimes. It's not right.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I didn't use it, but my company used the PKS solution.
How was the initial setup?
It's straightforward. The setup took two to three days.
What other advice do I have?
Red Hat is quite okay as a partner for helping us create the platform that we need. They do help you. They also provide training.
We use Red Hat AMQ streams and 3scale, and its integration with other Red Hat solutions is okay. The advantage of using multiple products from the same vendor is that you can get help from one company. You don't have to go to multiple companies.
It gives me the security that I need, but I didn't evaluate the security much. There is another department that's responsible for that.
I would recommend this solution to others, and overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
A complete PaaS solution for cloud-native Telco applications
What do you like best about the product?
RH OCP is a complete PaaS solution in itself. Not only for developers but also for deployment & configuration engineers that manage & create the underlying infrastructure for cloud-native applications. Along with that, it has been secured by RedHat which acts as an extra layer of trust for its users
What do you dislike about the product?
Just like any other product in this area RH OCP also needs improvement in managing the overall logging & monitoring solutions integrated with the PaaS layer. The solutions lags an in built monitoring solution that can extract all the Linux & K8s based metrics of the underlying infrastructure
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hosting a containerized application in a comparatively lesser resource-intensive infrastructure.
Lifecycle management of the application i.e. the CNFs in case of Telcos is relatively easy with RHOCP
Lifecycle management of the application i.e. the CNFs in case of Telcos is relatively easy with RHOCP
showing 221 - 230