I use pfSense for various reasons, including implementing IPsec technology due to having limited branches. I use a VPN for secure connections, control the Internet or network flow, employ it as an NTP server, facilitate conference calls, and set up VLANs. I use it to run a proxy server.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
A free solution to secure connections but lacks support
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I use the free version of Netgate pfSense software. I installed it on my servers with mini network cards, allowing me to create mini gateways and implement different plans.
What needs improvement?
The Netgate forums and community don’t provide extensive discussions and topics related to every pfSense service.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Netgate pfSense for five years. We are using the V23.09 of the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Everything is very smooth, with a user-friendly interface. You can use the user interface or CLI as a command.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 250 employees using this solution.
How are customer service and support?
We have Git Community forums with a million topics about all issues regarding Netgate pfSense. We can save this information to address various concerns.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have several reasons for choosing Netgate pfSense. Firstly, it serves my purposes effectively and is entirely free. Secondly, when I search on Google or inquire about past experiences with firewall workloads, its reliability and cost-effectiveness stand out.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is too easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is free of cost.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend using Postgres. However, if you need a firewall without additional tools and prefer a pool of well-established services, pfSense offers suitable features."
Other solutions like Postgres, Sophos, and Palo Alto are in the market. We've used firewalls for a long time, but in the last three years, I worked with pfSense, and it's efficient for all devices.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Our IT representatives at the plants find it easy to use and manage because of its straightforward interface
What is our primary use case?
I install Netgate pfSense in various locations. It is also used for monitoring traffic and acting as a proxy.
What is most valuable?
I handle the scanning for the finance department. I recently encountered an issue with our company bills. I resolved the matter, cleared the bill, and received calls regarding it using pfSense.
The user interface is extremely user-friendly, which is why we use it across various sites. Our IT representatives at the plants find it easy to use and manage because of its straightforward interface.
What needs improvement?
They rely on third-party tools, unlike Fortinet, for example, which has its own tools. In comparison, we also use third-party tools on pfSense. For example, we had a situation where we needed a tool to identify authorized users, and when I searched for a solution, I found a third-party tool. However, using such tools may come with additional costs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Netgate pfSense for around one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
If I think about pfSense, I would rate the stability around six. There have been some issues with stability, causing occasional downtime. I haven't extensively worked with pfSense in the last year, so my experience is limited.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of pfSense is excellent, and it's easy to expand. Currently, we have around 200-plus users at our head office using pfSense. I would rate it 7 out of 10.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't contacted Netgate technical support, so I can't provide feedback on that aspect.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Comparing pfSense with other vendors, I appreciate Fortinet for its all-in-one device with ALi involvement. However, for a country like Pakistan with limited resources, pfSense is suitable for small offices due to its cost-effectiveness.
How was the initial setup?
Installation is straightforward, especially for IT professionals. During the installation process, you are prompted to input the brand of the internet and LAN cables. If you're unsure, you can simply connect the cables – one for the internet and one for LAN – and proceed. You can choose to use either one or two cards based on your preference.
What about the implementation team?
Regarding maintenance and technical support, we have a team of around 14 technical staff who handle phone calls and work on maintenance when required.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale of one to ten for pfSense overall, I would rate it a seven. In comparison with other top devices like Fortinet and UDMP, pfSense stands equal in my opinion.
Poor support
Not promising better future
pfsense SOHO review
PFSense Review
It was quick and helpful
Also, many tools are ready to deploy.
Great product, good support; Netgate doesn't fail to impress.
Lastly, another thing for enterprise customers, VPN usage. Every major firewall appliance builds off of a simple, existing VPN solution. It'd be nice to have more support for the OpenVPN addons for instance, things like SAML/OIDC for enterprise customers would be amazing. Even if you can't build an API into the current builds having some level of VPN automation would also help immensely.
pfsense seems powerful and configurable though the docs are not the best
Will not launch in the US-WEST-2 region
I've successfully launched this in other regions, but it will not launch in the US-WEST-2 region. Please fix this! The system log shows the operating system halting and rebooting constantly.