Overview

Deploy Active Roles from AWS Marketplace
Active Roles allows you to manage and protect user and group accounts using automated task provisioning on directory objects, going above and beyond what is offered by native tools. Active Roles provides automation for consistent enforcement of corporate policies, an administrative model that allows you to delegate permissions based on role, and flexible, rule-based views across your entire AD identity environment via a consolidated single console. These features and more create a reliable and secure environment for distributed administration and account provisioning, allowing you to do your job faster.
Highlights
- Delegate least-privilege permissions based on role to ensure all identities and groups have proper privileges
- Consolidate all AD domains with Entra ID and M365 tenants onto a single console, ensuring better visibility and control over your entire AD/Entra ID/M365 environment
- Use automation to ensure accuracy and consistency of policy creation and enforcement and track changes to support your auditing and compliance reporting needs
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Buyer guide

Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
Vendor refund policy
All fees are non-refundable and non-cancellable except as required by law.
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Additional details
Usage instructions
To access the application launch a new EC2 instance from this AMI and connect to it via RDP.
For more information, see the Active Roles Quick Start Guide: https://support.oneidentity.com/technical-documents/active-roles/8.1.5/quick-start-guide
Resources
Support
Vendor support
Once contacted Sales, follow the steps in the link below under the section 'Installing and configuring Active Roles on the EC2 instance':
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Similar products
Customer reviews
Automation and delegated workflows have transformed how I manage secure user lifecycles
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Active Roles is to automate and secure user lifecycle management in Microsoft Active Directory , which helps reduce manual administrator efforts, enforce policies, and enable delegated administration with proper governance. For internal role changes, One Identity Active Roles updates access rights through control workflows, ensuring least privilege access. During employees' exits, accounts are automatically disabled and access is revoked. To maintain security, I use delegations to allow helpdesk teams to reset passwords and manage basic user attributes without giving full administrative rights. Approval workflows are implemented for sensitive access requests, ensuring compliance and audit readiness.
One Identity Active Roles centralizes and automates identity and access management for Microsoft Active Directory environments, primarily used to streamline user lifecycle management, enforce security policies, and enable role-based access control through delegated administrators. The solution helps reduce manual intervention and administrative tasks such as user account creation, modification, and deactivation, ensuring that access provisioning follows standardized workflows with proper approval, improving governance and compliance. Additionally, One Identity Active Roles provides auditing and reporting capabilities, which help organizations track changes, maintain compliance, and enhance overall security posture.
What is most valuable?
One of the standout features of One Identity Active Roles is its powerful automation capability, which streamlines user provisioning and de-provisioning processes and significantly reduces manual effort and minimizes human error. The delegation model is another key strength that allows organizations to assign limited administrative rights to helpdesk teams using role-based access control without granting full domain admin privilege, enhancing security. The approval workflow engine is highly valuable, ensuring that sensitive access requests go through proper authorization, improving governance and compliance. Additionally, the auditing and reporting capabilities provide complete visibility into changes made in Active Directory, which is critical for compliance and security monitoring. Finally, its seamless integration with Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft Entra makes it effective in managing both on-premises and hybrid identity environments.
In addition to its core automation and delegation capabilities, One Identity Active Roles offers several advanced features that enhance identity management. One notable feature is policy-based management, allowing organizations to enforce standardized rules such as naming conventions, attribute validation, and access control policies automatically. The solution also provides a web-based interface, enabling self-service capabilities for end-users and simplifying administrative tasks for IT teams. Another valuable feature is its advanced auditing and reporting system, providing detailed insight into all changes made within Active Directory, which is particularly useful for compliance and security monitoring. One Identity Active Roles supports hybrid identity environments through seamless integration with Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft Entra ID , allowing centralized management of both on-premises and cloud identities. Additionally, the solution includes flexible workflow customization, enabling organizations to design approval processes tailored to their business requirements. Overall, these additional features make One Identity Active Roles a comprehensive and scalable identity and access management solution.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Active Roles can be improved, as there are a few areas that could be enhanced. The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially when designing workflows, policies, and delegation models. It requires proper planning and skilled resources to implement effectively. The user interface, although functional, could be more modern and intuitive, as new users may require some time and training to become comfortable with the system. Reporting flexibility could also be improved, as there are built-in reports that are useful, but more customizable and user-friendly reporting options would enhance the overall experience. Additionally, the license cost is relatively high, which may concern small- to mid-sized organizations. Improving documentation and providing more guided implementation resources would help organizations accelerate deployment and reduce dependency on external support. Overall, addressing these areas would make the solution more accessible and easier to adopt.
One Identity Active Roles is a mature and feature-rich solution, but there are a few areas where improvement would enhance the overall experience, such as simplifying the initial deployment and configuration process, improving the user interface, enhancing reporting capabilities by providing more flexible options, and offering better documentation with more detailed implementation guides. Additionally, optimizing licensing costs or offering more flexible pricing models could make the solution more accessible to a wider range of organizations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Active Roles for around one to two years in an enterprise environment, primarily for Active Directory automations and access governance.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is stable and reliable in my environment, as I experience consistent performance with minimal downtime, handling large-scale user management operations efficiently without performance degradation. Once it is properly configured, it runs smoothly and supports day-to-day identity management tasks without issue, with any minor issues encountered mostly related to configuration and integration rather than the core stability of the product. Overall, I consider One Identity Active Roles to be a stable solution, suitable for enterprise-grade environments.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of One Identity Active Roles in my experience efficiently supports a large user base of five thousand or more users without performance issues, handling increasing workloads such as user provisioning, access management, and workflow processing with ease. The architecture allows for scaling by adding additional One Identity Active Roles servers, enabling load distribution and improved performance as the environment grows, and performs well in a hybrid environment by integrating with Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft Entra ID , making it adaptable to both on-premises and cloud-based identity management needs. Overall, the solution provides strong scalability and can grow alongside organizational requirements without significant limitation.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with customer support for One Identity Active Roles has been generally positive, as the support teams are knowledgeable and capable of handling technical issues related to configuring workflows and integration, responding promptly and helpfully to critical issues to ensure minimal operational impact. For standard or low priority cases, response times can vary, but the overall support quality remains satisfactory. The availability of documentation and knowledge-based articles is helpful, although more detailed and implementation-focused guidance would further improve the experience. Overall, I rate customer support around eight out of ten for responsiveness and technical expertise.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used a different solution, managing Microsoft Active Directory manually using native administrator tools and scripts, which provided basic functionality but lacked automation, centralized control, and governance features. Most user provisioning, modification, and access management tasks were performed manually, making it time-consuming and prone to human errors, with challenges in delegation and audit visibility. After moving to One Identity Active Roles, I achieve better automation, improved security through controlled delegation, and enhanced compliance with detailed auditing and reporting, significantly improving efficiency and reducing operational risk compared to the previous approach.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup and configuration of One Identity Active Roles can be complex, especially when designing workflows, policies, and delegation models. It requires proper planning and skilled resources to implement effectively. Organizations need to carefully coordinate the implementation process, involving multiple teams, including AD, security, and infrastructure, to ensure success.
What was our ROI?
I have observed a strong return on investment after implementing One Identity Active Roles, especially in terms of operational efficiency and risk reduction, as the automation of user lifecycle management reduces manual administrator efforts by approximately fifty percent, allowing IT teams to focus on more strategic tasks, while user provisioning timing decreases by around sixty to seventy percent, improving onboarding and overall service delivery. Overall, I believe the solution delivers solid ROI within a reasonable timeframe.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with the setup cost and licensing of One Identity Active Roles is that it has been on the higher side, as expected for an enterprise-grade identity and access management solution. The initial investment includes licensing, infrastructure setup, and implementation effort, with licensing typically based on the number of managed users or accounts, which can increase costs in large environments. However, the overall cost is justified by the value it delivers, as the automation capabilities significantly reduce manual administrative efforts, lowering operational costs over time while minimizing security risks and helping avoid potential compliance penalties. From a long-term perspective, I observe a good return on investment due to improved efficiency, reduced errors, and better governance. Overall, while the upfront cost might seem high, the benefits and operational savings make it a worthwhile investment for medium to large enterprises.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to organizations considering One Identity Active Roles is to clearly define their identity management requirements and plan the implementation carefully. Investing time designing workflows, delegation models, and policies before deployment ensures smooth operation and maximum benefit from the solution. Organizations should also conduct a proof of concept to validate key use cases such as lifecycle automation and access governance, and proper training for administrators and helpdesk teams is essential to fully utilize the platform's capabilities. Overall, One Identity Active Roles is highly recommended for organizations looking to streamline and secure Active Directory management. I provide this review with an overall rating of nine out of ten.
Automation has transformed onboarding and access control and delivers faster, safer user management
What is our primary use case?
One Identity Active Roles simplifies and automates user account management in Microsoft Active Directory environments, helping me reduce manual efforts, improve accuracy, and enforce standardized access control processes. The primary tasks I rely on it for are user provisioning and de-provisioning, password resets, account unlocks, group membership management, and handling joiner, mover, and leaver processes.
One practical example of how I use One Identity Active Roles for user provisioning is during new employee onboarding. When HR shares the joining details, I use One Identity Active Roles to create the user account through a predefined provisioning template. The template automatically populates attributes such as department, manager, email alias, OU placements, and required security group membership based on the employee's role. For example, if a user joins the finance team, selecting the finance template automatically assigns the correct access groups, mailbox settings, and naming standards. This saves time, avoids manual errors, and ensures the user gets the right access on day one.
In addition to onboarding and offboarding, another key use case with One Identity Active Roles is access modification during internal role changes. When an employee moves from one department to another, I use One Identity Active Roles to update the user profile and align access rights with the new role. It helps remove old permissions and assign new group membership through predefined roles, which reduces the risk of excess access.
How has it helped my organization?
One Identity Active Roles delivers the best features mainly focused on automation, security, and simplified identity administration. First is automated user provisioning and de-provisioning, which streamlines account creation, modification, disabling, and access removal through workflows and templates. Second is role-based access control and delegation, which allows fine-grained delegation so specific teams can manage only their required users or groups without full admin rights. Third is approval workflows that ensure sensitive access requests go through manager or application owner approvals before implementation.
In addition to provisioning and workflow automation, I would highlight reporting, auditing, and integration capabilities as a major strength of One Identity Active Roles. First is reporting and audit readiness, which provides detailed reports on user accounts, group memberships, permission changes, and administrative actions. I can easily track who made what change, when it was made, and whether it succeeded or failed, which is very useful during audits, investigations, and compliance reviews. Second is change history and accountability, where the management history feature gives visibility into modifications on specific objects such as users or groups.
What is most valuable?
One Identity Active Roles has had a very positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of efficiency, security, and compliance. One specific outcome was significant time saving during user onboarding. Earlier, creating a new user account, assigning group membership, mailbox settings, and validating access used to take considerable manual effort. With predefined templates and automated workflows, the same process becomes much faster and more standardized, allowing new joiners to get access on time with fewer delays. Another key benefit was improved security during employee exits or urgent terminations. Instead of manually checking multiple access groups, the de-provisioning workflow could immediately disable accounts, remove privilege access, and trigger follow-up actions. This reduced the risk of orphaned accounts or unauthorized access.
Automation is one of the key strengths of One Identity Active Roles because it helps convert repetitive identity administration tasks into standardized, policy-driven workflows. This improves efficiency, reduces errors, and strengthens governance.
What needs improvement?
One Identity Active Roles is a strong product, but like any enterprise tool, there are areas where it could be improved. First is a modernized user interface, as some administrative consoles and workflows can feel dated compared to newer SaaS identity platforms. Second is faster cloud-native capabilities, as deeper native integration with Microsoft Entra ID , SaaS applications, and zero-trust ecosystems could be expanded further as organizations move towards hybrid and cloud-first environments. Third is simplified upgrades and maintenance, as enterprise customers usually prefer smoother upgrade paths, reduced dependency complexity, and easier patch management with minimal downtime. Fourth is enhanced analytics and AI recommendations, where features such as anomaly detection, role mining, duplicate access identification, and AI-driven recommendations for least privilege access would strengthen governance.
In addition to the product features, I would mention documentation, support, and ecosystem integration as areas that could be enhanced in One Identity Active Roles. First is documentation and knowledge base, as more step-by-step implementation guides, architecture best practices, troubleshooting flows, and real-world use cases would help administrators deploy and manage the product faster for enterprise tools where clear and updated documentation is very important. Second is technical support experience, as faster turnaround for complex issues, more proactive guidance during upgrades and migrations, and easier access to senior technical experts would improve customer experience given that support is generally important for an identity platform because they are business-critical systems. Third is a broader integration ecosystem, as having more ready-made connectors and APIs for HR systems, SIEM platforms, ITSM tools, PAM solutions, and cloud applications would reduce customization effort. Integration with Microsoft ecosystems, ServiceNow , Splunk, and other security tools can add strong value.
In addition to the broader improvements already mentioned, there are several smaller and more practical enhancements needed for One Identity Active Roles that would add value in day-to-day operations. These include faster bulk operations, better search and filtering, improved notification options, easier custom workflow design, better performance visibility, and stronger self-service capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Active Roles for more than two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is generally a stable and reliable enterprise solution, especially when it is properly sized, maintained, and implemented according to best practices.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is generally strong in scalability, and it is designed for enterprise environments with growing identity and directory management needs. It is commonly used in medium to large organizations managing complex Microsoft Active Directory and hybrid identity environments.
How are customer service and support?
One Identity Active Roles support is generally good to very good, especially for enterprise customers with active support agreements. Industry reviews commonly describe support as responsive and technically knowledgeable.
I would rate the customer support for One Identity Active Roles an 8 out of 10. The main reasons are that support teams generally understand identity management workflows and Microsoft Active Directory environments well, and they are helpful for standard issues, configuration troubleshooting, and upgrade-related cases that are usually handled effectively. Complex cases can sometimes take longer to resolve, and escalation response times could be faster, which prevents a higher score.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before adopting One Identity Active Roles, many organizations, including ours, primarily relied on a combination of native Microsoft Active Directory tools and manual processes and scripts for identity administration.
How was the initial setup?
I would assess the integration of One Identity Active Roles with existing IT infrastructure and directory services as moderately easy to manageable, especially in environments already centered around Microsoft Active Directory. Because One Identity Active Roles is designed closely around AD administration, core integration with domain controllers, OU users, groups, and delegation administration is generally straightforward if the organization already has a well-structured AD environment, and deployment is usually smoother.
What was our ROI?
One Identity Active Roles has delivered a clear return on investment, mainly through time saving, reduced manual workload, and improved control over identity processes. First is time saved on user provisioning, as before automation, a standard onboarding request could take 20 to 30 minutes manually for account creation, group access, validation, and other communications. With templates and workflows, this reduces to around 5 to 10 minutes. If an organization handles 100 requests per month, that can save 20 to 35 plus admin hours monthly. Second is reduced dependence on senior administrators, as routine tasks like password resets, account unlocks, and basic updates could be delegated to service desk teams. This allowed senior AD administrators to focus on higher-value work, such as architecture, security reviews, and escalations rather than repetitive tickets.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
One Identity Active Roles is positioned as an enterprise-grade solution, so it is not the lowest-cost option, but it can deliver strong ROI when used at scale. The licensing is generally based on the number of managed users, accounts, and environment scope, which is common for identity management platforms. One Identity documentation notes managed user-based licensing metrics and usage statistics to help track compliance and future needs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before selecting One Identity Active Roles, it is common to evaluate multiple options based on automation, delegation, reporting, hybrid identity support, and total cost of ownership. In my case, the main alternatives considered were solutions focused on Active Directory administration and identity lifecycle management.
What other advice do I have?
Organizations looking into One Identity Active Roles should approach it as a strategic identity governance and administration platform, not just another AD management tool. It delivers the most value when implemented with clear processes, role models, and automated goals in mind. One Identity positions it around secure provisioning, delegation, and hybrid AD-Entra ID management. My overall rating for One Identity Active Roles is 9 out of 10.
Automated onboarding has reduced manual directory work and improves security with least privilege
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Active Roles is streamlining and securing Active Directory management. I typically use it for automatic user provisioning, deprovisioning, delegation, AD admin tasks without giving broader privileges, enforcing policy for account creation and changes, managing group membership, and role-based access.
One day-to-day example with One Identity Active Roles is new employee onboarding. When HR creates a new hire in the HR system, One Identity Active Roles automatically creates the AD account inside the AD, assigns it to the correct OU and naming format, adds email access and department-specific permissions, and sends requests for approval if needed. Instead of manually creating users, this is an automatic process that saves time and reduces errors.
What is most valuable?
One Identity Active Roles offers some of the best features including delegation with least privilege access, automation and lifecycle workflow, dynamic groups management, change tracking and auditing, and policy-based administration.
Using delegation and automation in One Identity Active Roles has mainly reduced manual work and improved the process. For example, with delegation, the helpdesk can reset passwords, unlock accounts, and update user attributes without needing domain admin access, which means fewer tickets escalated. With automation for onboarding, all the necessary permissions are automatically created, saving time and reducing mistakes. This has led to specific notable improvements such as faster user provisioning, reduced AD admin workload, and fewer ticket escalations to L2 and L3.
One Identity Active Roles has positively improved efficiency by strengthening security and reducing manual AD management work across the organization. I can say that it has led to faster provisioning, reduced manual work, improved security with least privilege delegation, better compliance and auditing, increased productivity, and centralized AD management. Overall, One Identity Active Roles has positively impacted our organization by automating user lifecycle management, reducing manual AD tasks, improving security through least privilege delegation, and providing centralized auditing, which means faster provisioning, fewer access errors, and improved operational efficiency.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for more than three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of One Identity Active Roles is very impressive and good.
How are customer service and support?
I have not worked with customer support yet, but I will be genuine about it once I have.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used manual efforts before choosing One Identity Active Roles.
How was the initial setup?
Integrating One Identity Active Roles with our existing IT infrastructure and directory services is very easy. For our environment, such as AD, integration is straightforward since One Identity Active Roles is built specifically for AD, connecting quickly and allowing us to start delegating permission and applying policies without any major changes.
What about the implementation team?
We are a reseller and have a business relationship with this vendor other than just being a customer.
What was our ROI?
Regarding return on investment, weekly we save around 16 hours, which we can utilize in a better way. These are the positive and measurable benefits I can share.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for One Identity Active Roles is very straightforward. The vendor has a transparent sales team.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using One Identity Active Roles is to go with the solution, not the money. I would rate this product 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Automation has transformed identity lifecycle management and now enforces strong access governance
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for One Identity Active Roles is to handle end-to-end identity life cycle process from user provisioning when an employee joins to modification during role changes, and secure de-provisioning when they leave. This ensures consistency, reduces manual error, and improves operational efficiency. Another key use case is policy-based administration. We enforce standardized naming conventions, attribute validation, and security policy across all AD objects. This helps maintain a clean and compliant directory structure. We also rely heavily on delegation and role-based access control, allowing teams like HR or service desk to perform specific activities without giving them full administrative rights. This improves both security and scalability. Additionally, One Identity Active Roles is used for workflow automation and approval, where access requests or changes go through predefined approval teams. This strengthens governance and ensures audit readiness. Overall, the main goal is to reduce manual effort, improve security, and enforce compliance.
What is most valuable?
One Identity Active Roles offers a powerful set of features that significantly improve automation, security, and governance in an Active Directory environment. One of the most valuable features is automation and lifecycle management. One Identity Active Roles allows us to automate provisioning, de-provisioning, and group management using workflows and policies. This reduces manual effort and ensures consistency across the organization.
Another key feature is policy-based administration. We can enforce business rules such as naming conventions, attribute validation, and access policies. This ensures that all changes in Active Directory follow a standardized and compliant approach. Delegation and role-based access control is also a standout feature. It enables fine-grained control over who can perform specific tasks, ensuring least-privileged access while distributing administrative responsibility efficiently.
One Identity Active Roles also provides single-pane-of-glass management for hybrid environments, allowing us to manage on-prem Active Directory, Azure AD, and Microsoft 365 from one interface. Another important feature is dynamic group management, where group memberships are automatically updated based on predefined rules. Additionally, the auditing and reporting capabilities are very strong. Every change is tracked with detailed logs, helping with compliance, troubleshooting, and audit readiness. Finally, integration and synchronization with systems such as HR tools, ServiceNow, and cloud platforms allow seamless identity management across multiple systems, making it a central hub for identity governance.
One of the biggest improvements has been operational efficiency by automating user lifecycle management, including onboarding, role changes, and off-boarding. We have significantly reduced manual effort and turnaround time. Tasks that previously took hours can now be done in a minute with far fewer errors. Another major impact has been on security and access control. With delegation and role-based access control, we have been able to enforce the principle of least privilege. Instead of giving broad administrative rights, we assign very specific permissions, which has reduced our risk exposure and improved our overall security posture. From a governance perspective, policy-based administration has helped us standardize how Active Directory is managed. This ensures consistency across the organization and eliminates issues caused by manual inconsistencies. Overall, One Identity Active Roles has helped us move toward a more automated, secure, scalable identity management model, aligning IT operations more closely with business needs.
What needs improvement?
While One Identity Active Roles is a very powerful platform, there are definitely areas where it can be improved to enhance usability and scalability. First is the user interface and experience. While it is functional, it can feel complex for a new user and less intuitive, especially for onboarding a new user. The second is the learning curve and setup. The initial setup and configuration, especially for policies, workflows, and delegation models, can be quite complex.
Third is reporting and analytics enhancement. Although auditing is strong, the reporting layer could be more flexible and visual, adding features such as more customizable dashboards and better visualization. Fourth is cloud and hybrid enhancement, such as a more seamless integration with Azure AD, Microsoft 365, and other SaaS platforms. Fifth is performance in large environments. In very large-scale deployments, some organizations may experience slower performance during complex queries or workflows. Sixth is documentation and training. While documentation exists, it can sometimes be too technical and not beginner-friendly. Overall, while One Identity Active Roles is already a robust and mature solution, improvements in usability, reporting, and cloud integration could make it even more powerful and accessible in the future.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of stability, One Identity Active Roles is a very stable and mature platform. Once properly implemented, it runs reliably with minimal downtime, handles daily operations consistently, and scales well with organizational growth. Overall, One Identity Active Roles has proven to be a stable, reliable, and well-suited solution for managing Active Directory at scale.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is highly scalable and well-suited for growing organizations. It can effectively handle a large number of users and groups across multiple domains and environments. As the organization grows, we do not need to proportionally increase the admin team. Automation handles repetitive tasks, and delegation distributes responsibility.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with One Identity customer support has been generally positive and reliable. For more complex issues, resolution may take longer, but overall, the support team is very helpful and knowledgeable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
How was the initial setup?
My overall assessment is that integration with the existing IT infrastructure and directory services is moderately straightforward but requires careful planning. Since One Identity Active Roles is designed to work closely with Active Directory, the core integration is quite smooth. It connects natively with domain controllers, which makes onboarding relatively seamless in a standard Microsoft environment. However, the complexity increases when designing delegation models, configuration policies, and workflows. Basic integration is easy to moderate, and advanced configuration and customization are more complex and require expertise.
What was our ROI?
We have definitely seen a clear return on investment after implementing One Identity Active Roles. The ROI comes mainly from time savings, reduced workload, and improved efficiency rather than just direct cost reductions. For example, by automating onboarding and delegating routine tasks, we have been able to save significant administrative hours each month and avoid expanding the IT team, which directly contributes to cost savings.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our experience with pricing and licensing for One Identity Active Roles has been on the higher side compared to native tools but justified by the value it delivers. Its pricing and licensing are based on the number of user-managed identities and the features and modules included. While the upfront cost may seem significant, it aligns with an enterprise-grade IAM solution.
What other advice do I have?
One Identity Active Roles has had a significant positive impact on our organization's compliance efforts. One of the biggest advantages is the built-in auditing and traceability. Every action, whether it is user creation, group modification, or permission changes, is logged with clear details of who performed it and when. Additionally, policy-based administration ensures that all changes follow predefined rules, which reduces the risk of non-compliant configurations. One Identity Active Roles has significantly reduced both the complexity and workload of Active Directory administration. After implementation, routine tasks are automated, responsibilities are distributed through delegation, and policies ensure consistency automatically.
My advice to others considering One Identity Active Roles would be to treat it as a strategic investment rather than just a tool. Before implementing, clearly define your identity management processes. Plan your delegation model and policies carefully. Start with a key use case such as user lifecycle resolution. If implemented correctly, it can significantly improve efficiency, security, and governance, but planning is critical to fully realize its value.
Overall, One Identity Active Roles has proven to be a reliable and valuable solution for managing Active Directory at scale. While there are areas for improvement, I would suggest this as one of the best tools I have ever used across my experience. I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.
Role-based automation has transformed daily directory tasks and now speeds secure user provisioning
What is our primary use case?
The main use case of One Identity Active Roles is to support daily Active Directory administrator tasks. Routine tasks such as user creation, password resetting, account updates, and handling are performed through One Identity Active Roles , which can be managed by the support team and has really improved the efficiency of our teams.
A real-time day-to-day example of using One Identity Active Roles is that a help desk user can reset the password and unlock the account without accessing Active Directory directly. When new users are created, required settings are applied automatically, making our jobs easier and operations very smooth. Previously, this was taking so much time, but nowadays it is automated, so it is a very good solution.
What is most valuable?
The best features One Identity Active Roles offers, in terms of my use cases, include its policy enforcement to ensure that all changes follow predefined standards, avoiding incorrect configuration and maintaining consistency across Active Directory, the role-based access control that allows assigning permissions based on job roles to simplify management and improve security in our organization, and its automation features.
I need to highlight role-based access control in One Identity Active Roles, as it has had the biggest day-to-day impact. Automation and policy enforcement are powerful, without doubt, but role-based access control is what fundamentally changed how we operate. Earlier, many tasks were a bottleneck, with only a senior admin able to perform most Active Directory changes, resulting in many help desk tickets. However, with One Identity Active Roles, we created fine-grained roles such as password reset, group management, and user provisioning, assigned those roles to the help desk team, and restricted access to only those organizational units based on attributes. Now, 90% of routine tasks are handled without escalation.
The effect of One Identity Active Roles on the complexity and workload of administrative tasks related to Active Directory has been very positive. It significantly reduces the operational burden while making processes more structured and controlled. It has really reduced administrative complexity. Tasks are handled through templates, policies, and workflows, which has significantly reduced the workload.
One Identity Active Roles has really impacted our organization very positively. It has improved control over Active Directory operations and reduced manual efforts. Tasks are completed faster than previously and more securely. These are the positive impacts we are seeing in day-to-day operations.
One Identity Active Roles has really proved its value. While exact numbers vary by environment, the provisioning time reduced by 70 to 80% and it is very smooth, and help desk ticket resolution improved by 60 to 80%. It has really reduced the use of privileged accounts, contributing to the positive impact we are seeing.
What needs improvement?
As far as improvements to One Identity Active Roles are concerned, I do not think any lack of features is present in the solution. It is working well and is a very powerful solution. There is no need for improvement as per my requirements.
One thing I can add is that One Identity Active Roles could be more simplified for the initial setup and configuration.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using One Identity Active Roles for more than four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One Identity Active Roles is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
From a scalability perspective, One Identity Active Roles is a very good solution. There is no kind of challenge.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support for One Identity Active Roles is very supportive and good in their technical aspects.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
From day one, we have been using One Identity Active Roles only.
How was the initial setup?
Regarding Active Directory integration with One Identity Active Roles, it was very smooth and quick. We have not seen any kind of challenge, and it synced with Active Directory beautifully.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a huge return on investment with One Identity Active Roles. In many cases, that was quite measurable, such as reduction in provisioning and admin efforts by 40 to 60%, which resulted in reduced need for additional staff. Without it, we would need thousands of additional people. Cost saving and efficiency gain have led to some users reporting approximately 75% ROI and cost reduction.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have had a great experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of One Identity Active Roles. There is no challenge we have seen as far as the vendor is concerned.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have not evaluated other options before choosing One Identity Active Roles.
What other advice do I have?
I will highly recommend One Identity Active Roles because it is a very useful tool for improving Active Directory management and control. It really reduces risk and improves efficiency. It is well suited for organizations with a large Active Directory environment, which I will recommend highly. I gave this review a rating of 8.